Cargando…

Analysis of EPID Transmission Fluence Maps Using Machine Learning Models and CNN for Identifying Position Errors in the Treatment of GO Patients

PURPOSE: To find a suitable method for analyzing electronic portal imaging device (EPID) transmission fluence maps for the identification of position errors in the in vivo dose monitoring of patients with Graves’ ophthalmopathy (GO). METHODS: Position errors combining 0-, 2-, and 4-mm errors in the...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Dai, Guyu, Zhang, Xiangbin, Liu, Wenjie, Li, Zhibin, Wang, Guangyu, Liu, Yaxin, Xiao, Qing, Duan, Lian, Li, Jing, Song, Xinyu, Li, Guangjun, Bai, Sen
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8476908/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34595115
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2021.721591
_version_ 1784575722500653056
author Dai, Guyu
Zhang, Xiangbin
Liu, Wenjie
Li, Zhibin
Wang, Guangyu
Liu, Yaxin
Xiao, Qing
Duan, Lian
Li, Jing
Song, Xinyu
Li, Guangjun
Bai, Sen
author_facet Dai, Guyu
Zhang, Xiangbin
Liu, Wenjie
Li, Zhibin
Wang, Guangyu
Liu, Yaxin
Xiao, Qing
Duan, Lian
Li, Jing
Song, Xinyu
Li, Guangjun
Bai, Sen
author_sort Dai, Guyu
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: To find a suitable method for analyzing electronic portal imaging device (EPID) transmission fluence maps for the identification of position errors in the in vivo dose monitoring of patients with Graves’ ophthalmopathy (GO). METHODS: Position errors combining 0-, 2-, and 4-mm errors in the left-right (LR), anterior-posterior (AP), and superior-inferior (SI) directions in the delivery of 40 GO patient radiotherapy plans to a human head phantom were simulated and EPID transmission fluence maps were acquired. Dose difference (DD) and structural similarity (SSIM) maps were calculated to quantify changes in the fluence maps. Three types of machine learning (ML) models that utilize radiomics features of the DD maps (ML 1 models), features of the SSIM maps (ML 2 models), and features of both DD and SSIM maps (ML 3 models) as inputs were used to perform three types of position error classification, namely a binary classification of the isocenter error (type 1), three binary classifications of LR, SI, and AP direction errors (type 2), and an eight-element classification of the combined LR, SI, and AP direction errors (type 3). Convolutional neural network (CNN) was also used to classify position errors using the DD and SSIM maps as input. RESULTS: The best-performing ML 1 model was XGBoost, which achieved accuracies of 0.889, 0.755, 0.778, 0.833, and 0.532 in the type 1, type 2-LR, type 2-AP, type 2-SI, and type 3 classification, respectively. The best ML 2 model was XGBoost, which achieved accuracies of 0.856, 0.731, 0.736, 0.949, and 0.491, respectively. The best ML 3 model was linear discriminant classifier (LDC), which achieved accuracies of 0.903, 0.792, 0.870, 0.931, and 0.671, respectively. The CNN achieved classification accuracies of 0.925, 0.833, 0.875, 0.949, and 0.689, respectively. CONCLUSION: ML models and CNN using combined DD and SSIM maps can analyze EPID transmission fluence maps to identify position errors in the treatment of GO patients. Further studies with large sample sizes are needed to improve the accuracy of CNN.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8476908
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-84769082021-09-29 Analysis of EPID Transmission Fluence Maps Using Machine Learning Models and CNN for Identifying Position Errors in the Treatment of GO Patients Dai, Guyu Zhang, Xiangbin Liu, Wenjie Li, Zhibin Wang, Guangyu Liu, Yaxin Xiao, Qing Duan, Lian Li, Jing Song, Xinyu Li, Guangjun Bai, Sen Front Oncol Oncology PURPOSE: To find a suitable method for analyzing electronic portal imaging device (EPID) transmission fluence maps for the identification of position errors in the in vivo dose monitoring of patients with Graves’ ophthalmopathy (GO). METHODS: Position errors combining 0-, 2-, and 4-mm errors in the left-right (LR), anterior-posterior (AP), and superior-inferior (SI) directions in the delivery of 40 GO patient radiotherapy plans to a human head phantom were simulated and EPID transmission fluence maps were acquired. Dose difference (DD) and structural similarity (SSIM) maps were calculated to quantify changes in the fluence maps. Three types of machine learning (ML) models that utilize radiomics features of the DD maps (ML 1 models), features of the SSIM maps (ML 2 models), and features of both DD and SSIM maps (ML 3 models) as inputs were used to perform three types of position error classification, namely a binary classification of the isocenter error (type 1), three binary classifications of LR, SI, and AP direction errors (type 2), and an eight-element classification of the combined LR, SI, and AP direction errors (type 3). Convolutional neural network (CNN) was also used to classify position errors using the DD and SSIM maps as input. RESULTS: The best-performing ML 1 model was XGBoost, which achieved accuracies of 0.889, 0.755, 0.778, 0.833, and 0.532 in the type 1, type 2-LR, type 2-AP, type 2-SI, and type 3 classification, respectively. The best ML 2 model was XGBoost, which achieved accuracies of 0.856, 0.731, 0.736, 0.949, and 0.491, respectively. The best ML 3 model was linear discriminant classifier (LDC), which achieved accuracies of 0.903, 0.792, 0.870, 0.931, and 0.671, respectively. The CNN achieved classification accuracies of 0.925, 0.833, 0.875, 0.949, and 0.689, respectively. CONCLUSION: ML models and CNN using combined DD and SSIM maps can analyze EPID transmission fluence maps to identify position errors in the treatment of GO patients. Further studies with large sample sizes are needed to improve the accuracy of CNN. Frontiers Media S.A. 2021-09-14 /pmc/articles/PMC8476908/ /pubmed/34595115 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2021.721591 Text en Copyright © 2021 Dai, Zhang, Liu, Li, Wang, Liu, Xiao, Duan, Li, Song, Li and Bai https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Oncology
Dai, Guyu
Zhang, Xiangbin
Liu, Wenjie
Li, Zhibin
Wang, Guangyu
Liu, Yaxin
Xiao, Qing
Duan, Lian
Li, Jing
Song, Xinyu
Li, Guangjun
Bai, Sen
Analysis of EPID Transmission Fluence Maps Using Machine Learning Models and CNN for Identifying Position Errors in the Treatment of GO Patients
title Analysis of EPID Transmission Fluence Maps Using Machine Learning Models and CNN for Identifying Position Errors in the Treatment of GO Patients
title_full Analysis of EPID Transmission Fluence Maps Using Machine Learning Models and CNN for Identifying Position Errors in the Treatment of GO Patients
title_fullStr Analysis of EPID Transmission Fluence Maps Using Machine Learning Models and CNN for Identifying Position Errors in the Treatment of GO Patients
title_full_unstemmed Analysis of EPID Transmission Fluence Maps Using Machine Learning Models and CNN for Identifying Position Errors in the Treatment of GO Patients
title_short Analysis of EPID Transmission Fluence Maps Using Machine Learning Models and CNN for Identifying Position Errors in the Treatment of GO Patients
title_sort analysis of epid transmission fluence maps using machine learning models and cnn for identifying position errors in the treatment of go patients
topic Oncology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8476908/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34595115
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2021.721591
work_keys_str_mv AT daiguyu analysisofepidtransmissionfluencemapsusingmachinelearningmodelsandcnnforidentifyingpositionerrorsinthetreatmentofgopatients
AT zhangxiangbin analysisofepidtransmissionfluencemapsusingmachinelearningmodelsandcnnforidentifyingpositionerrorsinthetreatmentofgopatients
AT liuwenjie analysisofepidtransmissionfluencemapsusingmachinelearningmodelsandcnnforidentifyingpositionerrorsinthetreatmentofgopatients
AT lizhibin analysisofepidtransmissionfluencemapsusingmachinelearningmodelsandcnnforidentifyingpositionerrorsinthetreatmentofgopatients
AT wangguangyu analysisofepidtransmissionfluencemapsusingmachinelearningmodelsandcnnforidentifyingpositionerrorsinthetreatmentofgopatients
AT liuyaxin analysisofepidtransmissionfluencemapsusingmachinelearningmodelsandcnnforidentifyingpositionerrorsinthetreatmentofgopatients
AT xiaoqing analysisofepidtransmissionfluencemapsusingmachinelearningmodelsandcnnforidentifyingpositionerrorsinthetreatmentofgopatients
AT duanlian analysisofepidtransmissionfluencemapsusingmachinelearningmodelsandcnnforidentifyingpositionerrorsinthetreatmentofgopatients
AT lijing analysisofepidtransmissionfluencemapsusingmachinelearningmodelsandcnnforidentifyingpositionerrorsinthetreatmentofgopatients
AT songxinyu analysisofepidtransmissionfluencemapsusingmachinelearningmodelsandcnnforidentifyingpositionerrorsinthetreatmentofgopatients
AT liguangjun analysisofepidtransmissionfluencemapsusingmachinelearningmodelsandcnnforidentifyingpositionerrorsinthetreatmentofgopatients
AT baisen analysisofepidtransmissionfluencemapsusingmachinelearningmodelsandcnnforidentifyingpositionerrorsinthetreatmentofgopatients