Cargando…
Strain comparisons in inhibitory discrimination learning and novel object recognition procedures
Strain differences in visual abilities and exploratory tendencies can confound rats’ performance in cognitive tests of learning and memory. In the present study we compared the performance of albino Wistar and pigmented Lister Hooded rats in appetitive conditioning and recognition memory procedures,...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elsevier Science
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8476941/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34400194 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.physbeh.2021.113557 |
_version_ | 1784575731386286080 |
---|---|
author | Waite, L. Bonardi, C. Stevenson, C.W. Cassaday, H.J. |
author_facet | Waite, L. Bonardi, C. Stevenson, C.W. Cassaday, H.J. |
author_sort | Waite, L. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Strain differences in visual abilities and exploratory tendencies can confound rats’ performance in cognitive tests of learning and memory. In the present study we compared the performance of albino Wistar and pigmented Lister Hooded rats in appetitive conditioning and recognition memory procedures, specifically within-subjects inhibitory learning (A+ /AX-) and novel object recognition (NOR) variants. The inhibition task included an excitatory training stage and summation and retardation tests. Difference scores were used to help control for individual variation in baseline nosepoke responding. NOR was tested after a 10 min delay, following 24hr delay and using a recency variant. Discrimination ratios were used to control for individual variation in exploratory activity. In the inhibitory learning procedure, Lister Hooded showed more magazine activity prior to stimulus presentations than Wistar rats but this was a transient effect restricted to day 1 of excitatory training. There was no strain difference in associative learning at the excitatory training stage. The Wistars went on to show some performance advantage at the inhibitory discrimination stage and marginally stronger retardation test performance. In the NOR tasks, there was no significant effect of strain on cognitive performance, but the Wistars showed some advantage in the 10 min delay variant, whereas in the 24hr delay and relative recency NOR variants, the Lister Hooded rats showed some advantage. Overall the results of the present study confirm the suitability of Wistar rats for use in associative learning and basic NOR procedures. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8476941 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Elsevier Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-84769412021-10-15 Strain comparisons in inhibitory discrimination learning and novel object recognition procedures Waite, L. Bonardi, C. Stevenson, C.W. Cassaday, H.J. Physiol Behav Article Strain differences in visual abilities and exploratory tendencies can confound rats’ performance in cognitive tests of learning and memory. In the present study we compared the performance of albino Wistar and pigmented Lister Hooded rats in appetitive conditioning and recognition memory procedures, specifically within-subjects inhibitory learning (A+ /AX-) and novel object recognition (NOR) variants. The inhibition task included an excitatory training stage and summation and retardation tests. Difference scores were used to help control for individual variation in baseline nosepoke responding. NOR was tested after a 10 min delay, following 24hr delay and using a recency variant. Discrimination ratios were used to control for individual variation in exploratory activity. In the inhibitory learning procedure, Lister Hooded showed more magazine activity prior to stimulus presentations than Wistar rats but this was a transient effect restricted to day 1 of excitatory training. There was no strain difference in associative learning at the excitatory training stage. The Wistars went on to show some performance advantage at the inhibitory discrimination stage and marginally stronger retardation test performance. In the NOR tasks, there was no significant effect of strain on cognitive performance, but the Wistars showed some advantage in the 10 min delay variant, whereas in the 24hr delay and relative recency NOR variants, the Lister Hooded rats showed some advantage. Overall the results of the present study confirm the suitability of Wistar rats for use in associative learning and basic NOR procedures. Elsevier Science 2021-10-15 /pmc/articles/PMC8476941/ /pubmed/34400194 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.physbeh.2021.113557 Text en © 2021 The Author(s) https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Waite, L. Bonardi, C. Stevenson, C.W. Cassaday, H.J. Strain comparisons in inhibitory discrimination learning and novel object recognition procedures |
title | Strain comparisons in inhibitory discrimination learning and novel object recognition procedures |
title_full | Strain comparisons in inhibitory discrimination learning and novel object recognition procedures |
title_fullStr | Strain comparisons in inhibitory discrimination learning and novel object recognition procedures |
title_full_unstemmed | Strain comparisons in inhibitory discrimination learning and novel object recognition procedures |
title_short | Strain comparisons in inhibitory discrimination learning and novel object recognition procedures |
title_sort | strain comparisons in inhibitory discrimination learning and novel object recognition procedures |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8476941/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34400194 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.physbeh.2021.113557 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT waitel straincomparisonsininhibitorydiscriminationlearningandnovelobjectrecognitionprocedures AT bonardic straincomparisonsininhibitorydiscriminationlearningandnovelobjectrecognitionprocedures AT stevensoncw straincomparisonsininhibitorydiscriminationlearningandnovelobjectrecognitionprocedures AT cassadayhj straincomparisonsininhibitorydiscriminationlearningandnovelobjectrecognitionprocedures |