Cargando…
The “collateral damage” of the war on COVID-19: impact of the pandemic on the care of epithelial ovarian cancer
The covid-19 pandemic has impacted the management of non-covid-19 illnesses. Epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) requires long-duration multidisciplinary treatment. Teleconsultation and shared care are suggested solutions to mitigate the consequences of the pandemic. However, these may be challenging to...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer US
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8476977/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34581889 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12032-021-01588-6 |
_version_ | 1784575741356146688 |
---|---|
author | Goenka, Luxitaa Anandaradje, Annuja Nakka, Tejaeswar Kayal, Smita Dubashi, Biswajit Chaturvedula, Latha Veena, Pampapati Durairaj, Jayalakshmi Penumadu, Prasanth Ganesan, Prasanth |
author_facet | Goenka, Luxitaa Anandaradje, Annuja Nakka, Tejaeswar Kayal, Smita Dubashi, Biswajit Chaturvedula, Latha Veena, Pampapati Durairaj, Jayalakshmi Penumadu, Prasanth Ganesan, Prasanth |
author_sort | Goenka, Luxitaa |
collection | PubMed |
description | The covid-19 pandemic has impacted the management of non-covid-19 illnesses. Epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) requires long-duration multidisciplinary treatment. Teleconsultation and shared care are suggested solutions to mitigate the consequences of the pandemic. However, these may be challenging to implement among patients who come from the lower economic strata. We report the disastrous impact of the pandemic on the care of EOC by comparing patients who were treated during the pandemic with those treated in the previous year. We collected the following data from newly diagnosed patients with EOC: time from diagnosis to treatment, time for completion of planned chemotherapy, and proportion of patients completing various components of therapy (surgery and chemotherapy). Patients treated between January 2019 and September 2019 (Group 1: Pre-covid) were compared with those treated between January 2020 and December 2020 (Group 2: During covid pandemic). A total of 82 patients were registered [Group 1: 43(51%) Group 2: 39(49)]. The median time from diagnosis to start of treatment was longer in group 2 when compared to group 1 [31(23–58) days versus 17(11–30) days (p = 0.03)]. The proportion of patients who had surgery in group 2 was lower in comparison to group 1 [33(77%) versus 21(54%) (p = 0.02)]. Proportion of patients who underwent neoadjuvant (NACT) and surgery were fewer in group 2 in comparison to group 1 [9(33%) versus 18(64%) p = 0.002]. Among patients planned for adjuvant chemotherapy, the median time from diagnosis to treatment was longer in group 2 [28(17–45) days, group 1 versus 49(26–78) days, group 2 (p = 0.04)]. The treatment of patients with EOC was adversely impacted due to the COVID-19 pandemic. There was a compromise in the proportion of patients completing planned therapy. Even among those who completed the treatment, there were considerable delays when compared with the pre-covid period. The impact of these compromises on the outcomes will be known with longer follow-up. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8476977 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Springer US |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-84769772021-09-28 The “collateral damage” of the war on COVID-19: impact of the pandemic on the care of epithelial ovarian cancer Goenka, Luxitaa Anandaradje, Annuja Nakka, Tejaeswar Kayal, Smita Dubashi, Biswajit Chaturvedula, Latha Veena, Pampapati Durairaj, Jayalakshmi Penumadu, Prasanth Ganesan, Prasanth Med Oncol Short Communication The covid-19 pandemic has impacted the management of non-covid-19 illnesses. Epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) requires long-duration multidisciplinary treatment. Teleconsultation and shared care are suggested solutions to mitigate the consequences of the pandemic. However, these may be challenging to implement among patients who come from the lower economic strata. We report the disastrous impact of the pandemic on the care of EOC by comparing patients who were treated during the pandemic with those treated in the previous year. We collected the following data from newly diagnosed patients with EOC: time from diagnosis to treatment, time for completion of planned chemotherapy, and proportion of patients completing various components of therapy (surgery and chemotherapy). Patients treated between January 2019 and September 2019 (Group 1: Pre-covid) were compared with those treated between January 2020 and December 2020 (Group 2: During covid pandemic). A total of 82 patients were registered [Group 1: 43(51%) Group 2: 39(49)]. The median time from diagnosis to start of treatment was longer in group 2 when compared to group 1 [31(23–58) days versus 17(11–30) days (p = 0.03)]. The proportion of patients who had surgery in group 2 was lower in comparison to group 1 [33(77%) versus 21(54%) (p = 0.02)]. Proportion of patients who underwent neoadjuvant (NACT) and surgery were fewer in group 2 in comparison to group 1 [9(33%) versus 18(64%) p = 0.002]. Among patients planned for adjuvant chemotherapy, the median time from diagnosis to treatment was longer in group 2 [28(17–45) days, group 1 versus 49(26–78) days, group 2 (p = 0.04)]. The treatment of patients with EOC was adversely impacted due to the COVID-19 pandemic. There was a compromise in the proportion of patients completing planned therapy. Even among those who completed the treatment, there were considerable delays when compared with the pre-covid period. The impact of these compromises on the outcomes will be known with longer follow-up. Springer US 2021-09-28 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC8476977/ /pubmed/34581889 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12032-021-01588-6 Text en © Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2021 This article is made available via the PMC Open Access Subset for unrestricted research re-use and secondary analysis in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for the duration of the World Health Organization (WHO) declaration of COVID-19 as a global pandemic. |
spellingShingle | Short Communication Goenka, Luxitaa Anandaradje, Annuja Nakka, Tejaeswar Kayal, Smita Dubashi, Biswajit Chaturvedula, Latha Veena, Pampapati Durairaj, Jayalakshmi Penumadu, Prasanth Ganesan, Prasanth The “collateral damage” of the war on COVID-19: impact of the pandemic on the care of epithelial ovarian cancer |
title | The “collateral damage” of the war on COVID-19: impact of the pandemic on the care of epithelial ovarian cancer |
title_full | The “collateral damage” of the war on COVID-19: impact of the pandemic on the care of epithelial ovarian cancer |
title_fullStr | The “collateral damage” of the war on COVID-19: impact of the pandemic on the care of epithelial ovarian cancer |
title_full_unstemmed | The “collateral damage” of the war on COVID-19: impact of the pandemic on the care of epithelial ovarian cancer |
title_short | The “collateral damage” of the war on COVID-19: impact of the pandemic on the care of epithelial ovarian cancer |
title_sort | “collateral damage” of the war on covid-19: impact of the pandemic on the care of epithelial ovarian cancer |
topic | Short Communication |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8476977/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34581889 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12032-021-01588-6 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT goenkaluxitaa thecollateraldamageofthewaroncovid19impactofthepandemiconthecareofepithelialovariancancer AT anandaradjeannuja thecollateraldamageofthewaroncovid19impactofthepandemiconthecareofepithelialovariancancer AT nakkatejaeswar thecollateraldamageofthewaroncovid19impactofthepandemiconthecareofepithelialovariancancer AT kayalsmita thecollateraldamageofthewaroncovid19impactofthepandemiconthecareofepithelialovariancancer AT dubashibiswajit thecollateraldamageofthewaroncovid19impactofthepandemiconthecareofepithelialovariancancer AT chaturvedulalatha thecollateraldamageofthewaroncovid19impactofthepandemiconthecareofepithelialovariancancer AT veenapampapati thecollateraldamageofthewaroncovid19impactofthepandemiconthecareofepithelialovariancancer AT durairajjayalakshmi thecollateraldamageofthewaroncovid19impactofthepandemiconthecareofepithelialovariancancer AT penumaduprasanth thecollateraldamageofthewaroncovid19impactofthepandemiconthecareofepithelialovariancancer AT ganesanprasanth thecollateraldamageofthewaroncovid19impactofthepandemiconthecareofepithelialovariancancer AT goenkaluxitaa collateraldamageofthewaroncovid19impactofthepandemiconthecareofepithelialovariancancer AT anandaradjeannuja collateraldamageofthewaroncovid19impactofthepandemiconthecareofepithelialovariancancer AT nakkatejaeswar collateraldamageofthewaroncovid19impactofthepandemiconthecareofepithelialovariancancer AT kayalsmita collateraldamageofthewaroncovid19impactofthepandemiconthecareofepithelialovariancancer AT dubashibiswajit collateraldamageofthewaroncovid19impactofthepandemiconthecareofepithelialovariancancer AT chaturvedulalatha collateraldamageofthewaroncovid19impactofthepandemiconthecareofepithelialovariancancer AT veenapampapati collateraldamageofthewaroncovid19impactofthepandemiconthecareofepithelialovariancancer AT durairajjayalakshmi collateraldamageofthewaroncovid19impactofthepandemiconthecareofepithelialovariancancer AT penumaduprasanth collateraldamageofthewaroncovid19impactofthepandemiconthecareofepithelialovariancancer AT ganesanprasanth collateraldamageofthewaroncovid19impactofthepandemiconthecareofepithelialovariancancer |