Cargando…

The “collateral damage” of the war on COVID-19: impact of the pandemic on the care of epithelial ovarian cancer

The covid-19 pandemic has impacted the management of non-covid-19 illnesses. Epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) requires long-duration multidisciplinary treatment. Teleconsultation and shared care are suggested solutions to mitigate the consequences of the pandemic. However, these may be challenging to...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Goenka, Luxitaa, Anandaradje, Annuja, Nakka, Tejaeswar, Kayal, Smita, Dubashi, Biswajit, Chaturvedula, Latha, Veena, Pampapati, Durairaj, Jayalakshmi, Penumadu, Prasanth, Ganesan, Prasanth
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer US 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8476977/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34581889
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12032-021-01588-6
_version_ 1784575741356146688
author Goenka, Luxitaa
Anandaradje, Annuja
Nakka, Tejaeswar
Kayal, Smita
Dubashi, Biswajit
Chaturvedula, Latha
Veena, Pampapati
Durairaj, Jayalakshmi
Penumadu, Prasanth
Ganesan, Prasanth
author_facet Goenka, Luxitaa
Anandaradje, Annuja
Nakka, Tejaeswar
Kayal, Smita
Dubashi, Biswajit
Chaturvedula, Latha
Veena, Pampapati
Durairaj, Jayalakshmi
Penumadu, Prasanth
Ganesan, Prasanth
author_sort Goenka, Luxitaa
collection PubMed
description The covid-19 pandemic has impacted the management of non-covid-19 illnesses. Epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) requires long-duration multidisciplinary treatment. Teleconsultation and shared care are suggested solutions to mitigate the consequences of the pandemic. However, these may be challenging to implement among patients who come from the lower economic strata. We report the disastrous impact of the pandemic on the care of EOC by comparing patients who were treated during the pandemic with those treated in the previous year. We collected the following data from newly diagnosed patients with EOC: time from diagnosis to treatment, time for completion of planned chemotherapy, and proportion of patients completing various components of therapy (surgery and chemotherapy). Patients treated between January 2019 and September 2019 (Group 1: Pre-covid) were compared with those treated between January 2020 and December 2020 (Group 2: During covid pandemic). A total of 82 patients were registered [Group 1: 43(51%) Group 2: 39(49)]. The median time from diagnosis to start of treatment was longer in group 2 when compared to group 1 [31(23–58) days versus 17(11–30) days (p = 0.03)]. The proportion of patients who had surgery in group 2 was lower in comparison to group 1 [33(77%) versus 21(54%) (p = 0.02)]. Proportion of patients who underwent neoadjuvant (NACT) and surgery were fewer in group 2 in comparison to group 1 [9(33%) versus 18(64%) p = 0.002]. Among patients planned for adjuvant chemotherapy, the median time from diagnosis to treatment was longer in group 2 [28(17–45) days, group 1 versus 49(26–78) days, group 2 (p = 0.04)]. The treatment of patients with EOC was adversely impacted due to the COVID-19 pandemic. There was a compromise in the proportion of patients completing planned therapy. Even among those who completed the treatment, there were considerable delays when compared with the pre-covid period. The impact of these compromises on the outcomes will be known with longer follow-up.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8476977
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Springer US
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-84769772021-09-28 The “collateral damage” of the war on COVID-19: impact of the pandemic on the care of epithelial ovarian cancer Goenka, Luxitaa Anandaradje, Annuja Nakka, Tejaeswar Kayal, Smita Dubashi, Biswajit Chaturvedula, Latha Veena, Pampapati Durairaj, Jayalakshmi Penumadu, Prasanth Ganesan, Prasanth Med Oncol Short Communication The covid-19 pandemic has impacted the management of non-covid-19 illnesses. Epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) requires long-duration multidisciplinary treatment. Teleconsultation and shared care are suggested solutions to mitigate the consequences of the pandemic. However, these may be challenging to implement among patients who come from the lower economic strata. We report the disastrous impact of the pandemic on the care of EOC by comparing patients who were treated during the pandemic with those treated in the previous year. We collected the following data from newly diagnosed patients with EOC: time from diagnosis to treatment, time for completion of planned chemotherapy, and proportion of patients completing various components of therapy (surgery and chemotherapy). Patients treated between January 2019 and September 2019 (Group 1: Pre-covid) were compared with those treated between January 2020 and December 2020 (Group 2: During covid pandemic). A total of 82 patients were registered [Group 1: 43(51%) Group 2: 39(49)]. The median time from diagnosis to start of treatment was longer in group 2 when compared to group 1 [31(23–58) days versus 17(11–30) days (p = 0.03)]. The proportion of patients who had surgery in group 2 was lower in comparison to group 1 [33(77%) versus 21(54%) (p = 0.02)]. Proportion of patients who underwent neoadjuvant (NACT) and surgery were fewer in group 2 in comparison to group 1 [9(33%) versus 18(64%) p = 0.002]. Among patients planned for adjuvant chemotherapy, the median time from diagnosis to treatment was longer in group 2 [28(17–45) days, group 1 versus 49(26–78) days, group 2 (p = 0.04)]. The treatment of patients with EOC was adversely impacted due to the COVID-19 pandemic. There was a compromise in the proportion of patients completing planned therapy. Even among those who completed the treatment, there were considerable delays when compared with the pre-covid period. The impact of these compromises on the outcomes will be known with longer follow-up. Springer US 2021-09-28 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC8476977/ /pubmed/34581889 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12032-021-01588-6 Text en © Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2021 This article is made available via the PMC Open Access Subset for unrestricted research re-use and secondary analysis in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for the duration of the World Health Organization (WHO) declaration of COVID-19 as a global pandemic.
spellingShingle Short Communication
Goenka, Luxitaa
Anandaradje, Annuja
Nakka, Tejaeswar
Kayal, Smita
Dubashi, Biswajit
Chaturvedula, Latha
Veena, Pampapati
Durairaj, Jayalakshmi
Penumadu, Prasanth
Ganesan, Prasanth
The “collateral damage” of the war on COVID-19: impact of the pandemic on the care of epithelial ovarian cancer
title The “collateral damage” of the war on COVID-19: impact of the pandemic on the care of epithelial ovarian cancer
title_full The “collateral damage” of the war on COVID-19: impact of the pandemic on the care of epithelial ovarian cancer
title_fullStr The “collateral damage” of the war on COVID-19: impact of the pandemic on the care of epithelial ovarian cancer
title_full_unstemmed The “collateral damage” of the war on COVID-19: impact of the pandemic on the care of epithelial ovarian cancer
title_short The “collateral damage” of the war on COVID-19: impact of the pandemic on the care of epithelial ovarian cancer
title_sort “collateral damage” of the war on covid-19: impact of the pandemic on the care of epithelial ovarian cancer
topic Short Communication
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8476977/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34581889
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12032-021-01588-6
work_keys_str_mv AT goenkaluxitaa thecollateraldamageofthewaroncovid19impactofthepandemiconthecareofepithelialovariancancer
AT anandaradjeannuja thecollateraldamageofthewaroncovid19impactofthepandemiconthecareofepithelialovariancancer
AT nakkatejaeswar thecollateraldamageofthewaroncovid19impactofthepandemiconthecareofepithelialovariancancer
AT kayalsmita thecollateraldamageofthewaroncovid19impactofthepandemiconthecareofepithelialovariancancer
AT dubashibiswajit thecollateraldamageofthewaroncovid19impactofthepandemiconthecareofepithelialovariancancer
AT chaturvedulalatha thecollateraldamageofthewaroncovid19impactofthepandemiconthecareofepithelialovariancancer
AT veenapampapati thecollateraldamageofthewaroncovid19impactofthepandemiconthecareofepithelialovariancancer
AT durairajjayalakshmi thecollateraldamageofthewaroncovid19impactofthepandemiconthecareofepithelialovariancancer
AT penumaduprasanth thecollateraldamageofthewaroncovid19impactofthepandemiconthecareofepithelialovariancancer
AT ganesanprasanth thecollateraldamageofthewaroncovid19impactofthepandemiconthecareofepithelialovariancancer
AT goenkaluxitaa collateraldamageofthewaroncovid19impactofthepandemiconthecareofepithelialovariancancer
AT anandaradjeannuja collateraldamageofthewaroncovid19impactofthepandemiconthecareofepithelialovariancancer
AT nakkatejaeswar collateraldamageofthewaroncovid19impactofthepandemiconthecareofepithelialovariancancer
AT kayalsmita collateraldamageofthewaroncovid19impactofthepandemiconthecareofepithelialovariancancer
AT dubashibiswajit collateraldamageofthewaroncovid19impactofthepandemiconthecareofepithelialovariancancer
AT chaturvedulalatha collateraldamageofthewaroncovid19impactofthepandemiconthecareofepithelialovariancancer
AT veenapampapati collateraldamageofthewaroncovid19impactofthepandemiconthecareofepithelialovariancancer
AT durairajjayalakshmi collateraldamageofthewaroncovid19impactofthepandemiconthecareofepithelialovariancancer
AT penumaduprasanth collateraldamageofthewaroncovid19impactofthepandemiconthecareofepithelialovariancancer
AT ganesanprasanth collateraldamageofthewaroncovid19impactofthepandemiconthecareofepithelialovariancancer