Cargando…

Evaluation of a rapid-antigen test for COVID-19 in an asymptomatic collective: A prospective study

BACKGROUND: Over the past year, there has been a significant increase in rapid antigen test (RAT) detection of SARS-CoV‑2 COVID-19. Antigen detection is usually inferior to real-time reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) in terms of sensitivity and specificity. The aim of this stu...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: von Ahnen, Thomas, von Ahnen, Martin, Wirth, Ulrich, Schardey, Hans Martin, Herdtle, Steffen
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Vienna 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8476981/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34581966
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10354-021-00883-1
_version_ 1784575742314545152
author von Ahnen, Thomas
von Ahnen, Martin
Wirth, Ulrich
Schardey, Hans Martin
Herdtle, Steffen
author_facet von Ahnen, Thomas
von Ahnen, Martin
Wirth, Ulrich
Schardey, Hans Martin
Herdtle, Steffen
author_sort von Ahnen, Thomas
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Over the past year, there has been a significant increase in rapid antigen test (RAT) detection of SARS-CoV‑2 COVID-19. Antigen detection is usually inferior to real-time reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) in terms of sensitivity and specificity. The aim of this study was to evaluate a RAT for specificity and sensitivity in an asymptomatic collective. METHODS: The study was carried out in January 2021 at a hospital located in a district with a 7-day index and an average of more than 100 cases per 100,000 inhabitants. COVID-19 patients are treated at this hospital. All employees with symptoms typical of COVID-19 were not allowed to go to work. We used RAT by Roche® (Roche Diagnostics GmbH, D-68305 Mannheim) and RT-PCR on our employees. The testing was done voluntarily. We performed RT-PCR and RAT using two swab tubes at the same time. RESULTS: We could correlate 919 RAT to 919 RT-PCR tests. 12 people tested positive in RAT. All 12 tests were validated by RT-PCR. There was not one incorrect positive result in RAT. In one person COVID-19 was not detected by RAT, but then positively identified with a RT-PCR. In the group of positive RAT, the mean cycle threshold (CT) value was 19.95. Our results showed a sensitivity of 92.3%, CI (confidence interval) [0.78; 1.00] and a specificity of 100.00% CI [1.0; 1.0]. CONCLUSION: RAT can be an important tool for screening for SARS-CoV‑2 COVID-19 at the point of care. With low cost and resource needs, high specificity, and high specificity, RAT are performed best during the early stages of SARS-CoV‑2 COVID-19, when the viral loads are high.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8476981
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Springer Vienna
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-84769812021-09-28 Evaluation of a rapid-antigen test for COVID-19 in an asymptomatic collective: A prospective study von Ahnen, Thomas von Ahnen, Martin Wirth, Ulrich Schardey, Hans Martin Herdtle, Steffen Wien Med Wochenschr Main Topic BACKGROUND: Over the past year, there has been a significant increase in rapid antigen test (RAT) detection of SARS-CoV‑2 COVID-19. Antigen detection is usually inferior to real-time reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) in terms of sensitivity and specificity. The aim of this study was to evaluate a RAT for specificity and sensitivity in an asymptomatic collective. METHODS: The study was carried out in January 2021 at a hospital located in a district with a 7-day index and an average of more than 100 cases per 100,000 inhabitants. COVID-19 patients are treated at this hospital. All employees with symptoms typical of COVID-19 were not allowed to go to work. We used RAT by Roche® (Roche Diagnostics GmbH, D-68305 Mannheim) and RT-PCR on our employees. The testing was done voluntarily. We performed RT-PCR and RAT using two swab tubes at the same time. RESULTS: We could correlate 919 RAT to 919 RT-PCR tests. 12 people tested positive in RAT. All 12 tests were validated by RT-PCR. There was not one incorrect positive result in RAT. In one person COVID-19 was not detected by RAT, but then positively identified with a RT-PCR. In the group of positive RAT, the mean cycle threshold (CT) value was 19.95. Our results showed a sensitivity of 92.3%, CI (confidence interval) [0.78; 1.00] and a specificity of 100.00% CI [1.0; 1.0]. CONCLUSION: RAT can be an important tool for screening for SARS-CoV‑2 COVID-19 at the point of care. With low cost and resource needs, high specificity, and high specificity, RAT are performed best during the early stages of SARS-CoV‑2 COVID-19, when the viral loads are high. Springer Vienna 2021-09-28 2022 /pmc/articles/PMC8476981/ /pubmed/34581966 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10354-021-00883-1 Text en © Springer-Verlag GmbH Austria, ein Teil von Springer Nature 2021 This article is made available via the PMC Open Access Subset for unrestricted research re-use and secondary analysis in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for the duration of the World Health Organization (WHO) declaration of COVID-19 as a global pandemic.
spellingShingle Main Topic
von Ahnen, Thomas
von Ahnen, Martin
Wirth, Ulrich
Schardey, Hans Martin
Herdtle, Steffen
Evaluation of a rapid-antigen test for COVID-19 in an asymptomatic collective: A prospective study
title Evaluation of a rapid-antigen test for COVID-19 in an asymptomatic collective: A prospective study
title_full Evaluation of a rapid-antigen test for COVID-19 in an asymptomatic collective: A prospective study
title_fullStr Evaluation of a rapid-antigen test for COVID-19 in an asymptomatic collective: A prospective study
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of a rapid-antigen test for COVID-19 in an asymptomatic collective: A prospective study
title_short Evaluation of a rapid-antigen test for COVID-19 in an asymptomatic collective: A prospective study
title_sort evaluation of a rapid-antigen test for covid-19 in an asymptomatic collective: a prospective study
topic Main Topic
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8476981/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34581966
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10354-021-00883-1
work_keys_str_mv AT vonahnenthomas evaluationofarapidantigentestforcovid19inanasymptomaticcollectiveaprospectivestudy
AT vonahnenmartin evaluationofarapidantigentestforcovid19inanasymptomaticcollectiveaprospectivestudy
AT wirthulrich evaluationofarapidantigentestforcovid19inanasymptomaticcollectiveaprospectivestudy
AT schardeyhansmartin evaluationofarapidantigentestforcovid19inanasymptomaticcollectiveaprospectivestudy
AT herdtlesteffen evaluationofarapidantigentestforcovid19inanasymptomaticcollectiveaprospectivestudy