Cargando…

Before/after intervention study to determine impact on life-cycle carbon footprint of converting from single-use to reusable sharps containers in 40 UK NHS trusts

OBJECTIVES: To compare global warming potential (GWP) of hospitals converting from single-use sharps containers to reusable sharps containers (SSC, RSC). Does conversion to RSC result in GWP reduction? DESIGN: Using BS PAS 2050:2011 principles, a retrospective, before/after intervention quantitative...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Grimmond, Terry Richard, Bright, Anna, Cadman, June, Dixon, James, Ludditt, Sally, Robinson, Clive, Topping, Clare
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8477330/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34580089
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-046200
_version_ 1784575820659949568
author Grimmond, Terry Richard
Bright, Anna
Cadman, June
Dixon, James
Ludditt, Sally
Robinson, Clive
Topping, Clare
author_facet Grimmond, Terry Richard
Bright, Anna
Cadman, June
Dixon, James
Ludditt, Sally
Robinson, Clive
Topping, Clare
author_sort Grimmond, Terry Richard
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: To compare global warming potential (GWP) of hospitals converting from single-use sharps containers to reusable sharps containers (SSC, RSC). Does conversion to RSC result in GWP reduction? DESIGN: Using BS PAS 2050:2011 principles, a retrospective, before/after intervention quantitative model together with a purpose-designed, attributional ‘cradle-to-grave’ life-cycle tool, were used to determine the annual greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions of the two sharps containment systems. Functional unit was total fill line litres (FLL) of sharps containers needed to dispose of sharps for 1-year period in 40 trusts. Scopes 1, 2 and 3 emissions were included. Results were workload-normalised using National Health Service (NHS) national hospital patient-workload indicators. A sensitivity analysis examined areas of data variability. SETTING: Acute care hospital trusts in UK. PARTICIPANTS: 40 NHS hospital Trusts using RSC. INTERVENTION: Conversion from SSC to RSC. SSC and RSC usage details in 17 base line trusts immediately prior to 2018 were applied to the RSC usage details of the 40 trusts using RSC in 2019. PRIMARY OUTCOME MEASURE: The comparison of GWP calculated in carbon dioxide equivalents (CO(2)e) generated in the manufacture, transport, service and disposal of 12 months, hospital-wide usage of both containment systems in the 40 trusts. RESULTS: The 40 trusts converting to RSC reduced their combined annual GWP by 3267.4 tonnes CO(2)e (−83.9%); eliminated incineration of 900.8 tonnes of plastic; eliminated disposal/recycling of 132.5 tonnes of cardboard and reduced container exchanges by 61.1%. GHG as kg CO(2)e/1000 FLL were 313.0 and 50.7 for SSC and RSC systems, respectively. A sensitivity analysis showed substantial GHG reductions within unit processes could be achieved, however, their impact on relevant final GWP comparison varied <5% from base comparison. CONCLUSIONS: Adopting RSC is an example of a sustainable purchasing decision that can assist trusts meet NHS GHG reduction targets and can reduce GWP permanently with minimal staff behavioural change.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8477330
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-84773302021-10-08 Before/after intervention study to determine impact on life-cycle carbon footprint of converting from single-use to reusable sharps containers in 40 UK NHS trusts Grimmond, Terry Richard Bright, Anna Cadman, June Dixon, James Ludditt, Sally Robinson, Clive Topping, Clare BMJ Open Public Health OBJECTIVES: To compare global warming potential (GWP) of hospitals converting from single-use sharps containers to reusable sharps containers (SSC, RSC). Does conversion to RSC result in GWP reduction? DESIGN: Using BS PAS 2050:2011 principles, a retrospective, before/after intervention quantitative model together with a purpose-designed, attributional ‘cradle-to-grave’ life-cycle tool, were used to determine the annual greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions of the two sharps containment systems. Functional unit was total fill line litres (FLL) of sharps containers needed to dispose of sharps for 1-year period in 40 trusts. Scopes 1, 2 and 3 emissions were included. Results were workload-normalised using National Health Service (NHS) national hospital patient-workload indicators. A sensitivity analysis examined areas of data variability. SETTING: Acute care hospital trusts in UK. PARTICIPANTS: 40 NHS hospital Trusts using RSC. INTERVENTION: Conversion from SSC to RSC. SSC and RSC usage details in 17 base line trusts immediately prior to 2018 were applied to the RSC usage details of the 40 trusts using RSC in 2019. PRIMARY OUTCOME MEASURE: The comparison of GWP calculated in carbon dioxide equivalents (CO(2)e) generated in the manufacture, transport, service and disposal of 12 months, hospital-wide usage of both containment systems in the 40 trusts. RESULTS: The 40 trusts converting to RSC reduced their combined annual GWP by 3267.4 tonnes CO(2)e (−83.9%); eliminated incineration of 900.8 tonnes of plastic; eliminated disposal/recycling of 132.5 tonnes of cardboard and reduced container exchanges by 61.1%. GHG as kg CO(2)e/1000 FLL were 313.0 and 50.7 for SSC and RSC systems, respectively. A sensitivity analysis showed substantial GHG reductions within unit processes could be achieved, however, their impact on relevant final GWP comparison varied <5% from base comparison. CONCLUSIONS: Adopting RSC is an example of a sustainable purchasing decision that can assist trusts meet NHS GHG reduction targets and can reduce GWP permanently with minimal staff behavioural change. BMJ Publishing Group 2021-09-27 /pmc/articles/PMC8477330/ /pubmed/34580089 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-046200 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Public Health
Grimmond, Terry Richard
Bright, Anna
Cadman, June
Dixon, James
Ludditt, Sally
Robinson, Clive
Topping, Clare
Before/after intervention study to determine impact on life-cycle carbon footprint of converting from single-use to reusable sharps containers in 40 UK NHS trusts
title Before/after intervention study to determine impact on life-cycle carbon footprint of converting from single-use to reusable sharps containers in 40 UK NHS trusts
title_full Before/after intervention study to determine impact on life-cycle carbon footprint of converting from single-use to reusable sharps containers in 40 UK NHS trusts
title_fullStr Before/after intervention study to determine impact on life-cycle carbon footprint of converting from single-use to reusable sharps containers in 40 UK NHS trusts
title_full_unstemmed Before/after intervention study to determine impact on life-cycle carbon footprint of converting from single-use to reusable sharps containers in 40 UK NHS trusts
title_short Before/after intervention study to determine impact on life-cycle carbon footprint of converting from single-use to reusable sharps containers in 40 UK NHS trusts
title_sort before/after intervention study to determine impact on life-cycle carbon footprint of converting from single-use to reusable sharps containers in 40 uk nhs trusts
topic Public Health
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8477330/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34580089
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-046200
work_keys_str_mv AT grimmondterryrichard beforeafterinterventionstudytodetermineimpactonlifecyclecarbonfootprintofconvertingfromsingleusetoreusablesharpscontainersin40uknhstrusts
AT brightanna beforeafterinterventionstudytodetermineimpactonlifecyclecarbonfootprintofconvertingfromsingleusetoreusablesharpscontainersin40uknhstrusts
AT cadmanjune beforeafterinterventionstudytodetermineimpactonlifecyclecarbonfootprintofconvertingfromsingleusetoreusablesharpscontainersin40uknhstrusts
AT dixonjames beforeafterinterventionstudytodetermineimpactonlifecyclecarbonfootprintofconvertingfromsingleusetoreusablesharpscontainersin40uknhstrusts
AT luddittsally beforeafterinterventionstudytodetermineimpactonlifecyclecarbonfootprintofconvertingfromsingleusetoreusablesharpscontainersin40uknhstrusts
AT robinsonclive beforeafterinterventionstudytodetermineimpactonlifecyclecarbonfootprintofconvertingfromsingleusetoreusablesharpscontainersin40uknhstrusts
AT toppingclare beforeafterinterventionstudytodetermineimpactonlifecyclecarbonfootprintofconvertingfromsingleusetoreusablesharpscontainersin40uknhstrusts