Cargando…

Follow-up colonoscopy after an abnormal stool-based colorectal cancer screening result: analysis of steps in the colonoscopy completion process

BACKGROUND: Delays in receiving follow-up colonoscopy after an abnormal fecal immunochemical test (FIT) result are associated with increased colorectal cancer incidence and mortality. Little is known about patterns of follow-up colonoscopy completion in federally qualified health centers. METHODS: W...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Coronado, Gloria D., Kihn-Stang, Alexandra, Slaughter, Matthew T., Petrik, Amanda F., Thompson, Jamie H., Rivelli, Jennifer S., Jimenez, Ricardo, Gibbs, Jeffrey, Yadav, Neha, Mummadi, Rajasekhara R.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8477359/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34583638
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12876-021-01923-1
_version_ 1784575825816846336
author Coronado, Gloria D.
Kihn-Stang, Alexandra
Slaughter, Matthew T.
Petrik, Amanda F.
Thompson, Jamie H.
Rivelli, Jennifer S.
Jimenez, Ricardo
Gibbs, Jeffrey
Yadav, Neha
Mummadi, Rajasekhara R.
author_facet Coronado, Gloria D.
Kihn-Stang, Alexandra
Slaughter, Matthew T.
Petrik, Amanda F.
Thompson, Jamie H.
Rivelli, Jennifer S.
Jimenez, Ricardo
Gibbs, Jeffrey
Yadav, Neha
Mummadi, Rajasekhara R.
author_sort Coronado, Gloria D.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Delays in receiving follow-up colonoscopy after an abnormal fecal immunochemical test (FIT) result are associated with increased colorectal cancer incidence and mortality. Little is known about patterns of follow-up colonoscopy completion in federally qualified health centers. METHODS: We abstracted the medical records of health center patients, aged 50–75 years, who had an abnormal FIT result between August 5, 2017 and August 4, 2018 (N = 711). We assessed one-year rates of colonoscopy referral, pre-procedure visit completion, colonoscopy completion, and time to colonoscopy; associations between these outcomes and patient characteristics; and reasons for non-completion found in the medical record. RESULTS: Of the 711 patients with an abnormal FIT result, 90% were referred to colonoscopy, but only 52% completed a pre-procedure visit, and 43% completed a colonoscopy within 1 year. Median time to colonoscopy was 83 days (interquartile range: 52–131 days). Pre-procedure visit and colonoscopy completion rates were relatively low in patients aged 65–75 (vs. 50–64), who were uninsured (vs. insured) or had no clinic visit in the prior year (vs. ≥ 1 clinic visit). Common reasons listed for non-completion were that the patient declined, or the provider could not reach the patient. DISCUSSION: Efforts to improve follow-up colonoscopy rates in health centers might focus on supporting the care transition from primary to specialty gastroenterology care and emphasize care for older uninsured patients and those having no recent clinic visits. Our findings can inform efforts to improve follow-up colonoscopy uptake, reduce time to colonoscopy receipt, and save lives from colorectal cancer. Trial registration: National Clinical Trial (NCT) Identifier: NCT03925883.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8477359
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-84773592021-09-28 Follow-up colonoscopy after an abnormal stool-based colorectal cancer screening result: analysis of steps in the colonoscopy completion process Coronado, Gloria D. Kihn-Stang, Alexandra Slaughter, Matthew T. Petrik, Amanda F. Thompson, Jamie H. Rivelli, Jennifer S. Jimenez, Ricardo Gibbs, Jeffrey Yadav, Neha Mummadi, Rajasekhara R. BMC Gastroenterol Research Article BACKGROUND: Delays in receiving follow-up colonoscopy after an abnormal fecal immunochemical test (FIT) result are associated with increased colorectal cancer incidence and mortality. Little is known about patterns of follow-up colonoscopy completion in federally qualified health centers. METHODS: We abstracted the medical records of health center patients, aged 50–75 years, who had an abnormal FIT result between August 5, 2017 and August 4, 2018 (N = 711). We assessed one-year rates of colonoscopy referral, pre-procedure visit completion, colonoscopy completion, and time to colonoscopy; associations between these outcomes and patient characteristics; and reasons for non-completion found in the medical record. RESULTS: Of the 711 patients with an abnormal FIT result, 90% were referred to colonoscopy, but only 52% completed a pre-procedure visit, and 43% completed a colonoscopy within 1 year. Median time to colonoscopy was 83 days (interquartile range: 52–131 days). Pre-procedure visit and colonoscopy completion rates were relatively low in patients aged 65–75 (vs. 50–64), who were uninsured (vs. insured) or had no clinic visit in the prior year (vs. ≥ 1 clinic visit). Common reasons listed for non-completion were that the patient declined, or the provider could not reach the patient. DISCUSSION: Efforts to improve follow-up colonoscopy rates in health centers might focus on supporting the care transition from primary to specialty gastroenterology care and emphasize care for older uninsured patients and those having no recent clinic visits. Our findings can inform efforts to improve follow-up colonoscopy uptake, reduce time to colonoscopy receipt, and save lives from colorectal cancer. Trial registration: National Clinical Trial (NCT) Identifier: NCT03925883. BioMed Central 2021-09-28 /pmc/articles/PMC8477359/ /pubmed/34583638 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12876-021-01923-1 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research Article
Coronado, Gloria D.
Kihn-Stang, Alexandra
Slaughter, Matthew T.
Petrik, Amanda F.
Thompson, Jamie H.
Rivelli, Jennifer S.
Jimenez, Ricardo
Gibbs, Jeffrey
Yadav, Neha
Mummadi, Rajasekhara R.
Follow-up colonoscopy after an abnormal stool-based colorectal cancer screening result: analysis of steps in the colonoscopy completion process
title Follow-up colonoscopy after an abnormal stool-based colorectal cancer screening result: analysis of steps in the colonoscopy completion process
title_full Follow-up colonoscopy after an abnormal stool-based colorectal cancer screening result: analysis of steps in the colonoscopy completion process
title_fullStr Follow-up colonoscopy after an abnormal stool-based colorectal cancer screening result: analysis of steps in the colonoscopy completion process
title_full_unstemmed Follow-up colonoscopy after an abnormal stool-based colorectal cancer screening result: analysis of steps in the colonoscopy completion process
title_short Follow-up colonoscopy after an abnormal stool-based colorectal cancer screening result: analysis of steps in the colonoscopy completion process
title_sort follow-up colonoscopy after an abnormal stool-based colorectal cancer screening result: analysis of steps in the colonoscopy completion process
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8477359/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34583638
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12876-021-01923-1
work_keys_str_mv AT coronadogloriad followupcolonoscopyafteranabnormalstoolbasedcolorectalcancerscreeningresultanalysisofstepsinthecolonoscopycompletionprocess
AT kihnstangalexandra followupcolonoscopyafteranabnormalstoolbasedcolorectalcancerscreeningresultanalysisofstepsinthecolonoscopycompletionprocess
AT slaughtermatthewt followupcolonoscopyafteranabnormalstoolbasedcolorectalcancerscreeningresultanalysisofstepsinthecolonoscopycompletionprocess
AT petrikamandaf followupcolonoscopyafteranabnormalstoolbasedcolorectalcancerscreeningresultanalysisofstepsinthecolonoscopycompletionprocess
AT thompsonjamieh followupcolonoscopyafteranabnormalstoolbasedcolorectalcancerscreeningresultanalysisofstepsinthecolonoscopycompletionprocess
AT rivellijennifers followupcolonoscopyafteranabnormalstoolbasedcolorectalcancerscreeningresultanalysisofstepsinthecolonoscopycompletionprocess
AT jimenezricardo followupcolonoscopyafteranabnormalstoolbasedcolorectalcancerscreeningresultanalysisofstepsinthecolonoscopycompletionprocess
AT gibbsjeffrey followupcolonoscopyafteranabnormalstoolbasedcolorectalcancerscreeningresultanalysisofstepsinthecolonoscopycompletionprocess
AT yadavneha followupcolonoscopyafteranabnormalstoolbasedcolorectalcancerscreeningresultanalysisofstepsinthecolonoscopycompletionprocess
AT mummadirajasekharar followupcolonoscopyafteranabnormalstoolbasedcolorectalcancerscreeningresultanalysisofstepsinthecolonoscopycompletionprocess