Cargando…
Natural vs. programmed cycles for frozen embryo transfer: study protocol for an investigator-initiated, randomized, controlled, multicenter clinical trial
BACKGROUND: Randomized trials of assisted reproductive technology (ART) have been designed for outcomes of clinical pregnancy or live birth and have not been powered for obstetric outcomes such as preeclampsia, critical for maternal and fetal health. ART increasingly involves frozen embryo transfer...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8477459/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34579768 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-021-05637-3 |
_version_ | 1784575845926436864 |
---|---|
author | Baksh, Sheriza Casper, Anne Christianson, Mindy S. Devine, Kate Doody, Kevin J. Ehrhardt, Stephan Hansen, Karl R. Lathi, Ruth B. Timbo, Fatmata Usadi, Rebecca Vitek, Wendy Shade, David M. Segars, James Baker, Valerie L. |
author_facet | Baksh, Sheriza Casper, Anne Christianson, Mindy S. Devine, Kate Doody, Kevin J. Ehrhardt, Stephan Hansen, Karl R. Lathi, Ruth B. Timbo, Fatmata Usadi, Rebecca Vitek, Wendy Shade, David M. Segars, James Baker, Valerie L. |
author_sort | Baksh, Sheriza |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Randomized trials of assisted reproductive technology (ART) have been designed for outcomes of clinical pregnancy or live birth and have not been powered for obstetric outcomes such as preeclampsia, critical for maternal and fetal health. ART increasingly involves frozen embryo transfer (FET). Although there are advantages of FET, multiple studies have shown that risk of preeclampsia is increased with FET compared with fresh embryo transfer, and the reason for this difference is not clear. NatPro will compare the proportion of preeclampsia between two commonly used protocols for FET,modified natural and programmed cycle. METHODS: In this two-arm, parallel-group, multi-center randomized trial, NatPro will randomize 788 women to either modified natural or programmed FET and follow them for up to three FET cycles. Primary outcome will be the proportion of preeclampsia in women with a viable pregnancy assigned to a modified natural cycle FET (corpus luteum present) protocol compared to the proportion of preeclampsia in pregnant women assigned to a programmed FET (corpus luteum absent) protocol. Secondary outcomes will compare the proportion of live births and the proportion of preeclampsia with severe features between the protocols. CONCLUSION: This study has a potential significant impact on millions of women who pursue ART to build their families. NatPro is designed to provide clinically relevant guidance to inform patients and clinicians regarding maternal risk with programmed and modified natural cycle FET protocols. This study will also provide accurate point estimates regarding the likelihood of live birth with programmed and modified natural cycle FET. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.govNCT04551807. Registered on September 16, 2020 SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13063-021-05637-3. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8477459 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-84774592021-09-28 Natural vs. programmed cycles for frozen embryo transfer: study protocol for an investigator-initiated, randomized, controlled, multicenter clinical trial Baksh, Sheriza Casper, Anne Christianson, Mindy S. Devine, Kate Doody, Kevin J. Ehrhardt, Stephan Hansen, Karl R. Lathi, Ruth B. Timbo, Fatmata Usadi, Rebecca Vitek, Wendy Shade, David M. Segars, James Baker, Valerie L. Trials Study Protocol BACKGROUND: Randomized trials of assisted reproductive technology (ART) have been designed for outcomes of clinical pregnancy or live birth and have not been powered for obstetric outcomes such as preeclampsia, critical for maternal and fetal health. ART increasingly involves frozen embryo transfer (FET). Although there are advantages of FET, multiple studies have shown that risk of preeclampsia is increased with FET compared with fresh embryo transfer, and the reason for this difference is not clear. NatPro will compare the proportion of preeclampsia between two commonly used protocols for FET,modified natural and programmed cycle. METHODS: In this two-arm, parallel-group, multi-center randomized trial, NatPro will randomize 788 women to either modified natural or programmed FET and follow them for up to three FET cycles. Primary outcome will be the proportion of preeclampsia in women with a viable pregnancy assigned to a modified natural cycle FET (corpus luteum present) protocol compared to the proportion of preeclampsia in pregnant women assigned to a programmed FET (corpus luteum absent) protocol. Secondary outcomes will compare the proportion of live births and the proportion of preeclampsia with severe features between the protocols. CONCLUSION: This study has a potential significant impact on millions of women who pursue ART to build their families. NatPro is designed to provide clinically relevant guidance to inform patients and clinicians regarding maternal risk with programmed and modified natural cycle FET protocols. This study will also provide accurate point estimates regarding the likelihood of live birth with programmed and modified natural cycle FET. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.govNCT04551807. Registered on September 16, 2020 SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13063-021-05637-3. BioMed Central 2021-09-27 /pmc/articles/PMC8477459/ /pubmed/34579768 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-021-05637-3 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Study Protocol Baksh, Sheriza Casper, Anne Christianson, Mindy S. Devine, Kate Doody, Kevin J. Ehrhardt, Stephan Hansen, Karl R. Lathi, Ruth B. Timbo, Fatmata Usadi, Rebecca Vitek, Wendy Shade, David M. Segars, James Baker, Valerie L. Natural vs. programmed cycles for frozen embryo transfer: study protocol for an investigator-initiated, randomized, controlled, multicenter clinical trial |
title | Natural vs. programmed cycles for frozen embryo transfer: study protocol for an investigator-initiated, randomized, controlled, multicenter clinical trial |
title_full | Natural vs. programmed cycles for frozen embryo transfer: study protocol for an investigator-initiated, randomized, controlled, multicenter clinical trial |
title_fullStr | Natural vs. programmed cycles for frozen embryo transfer: study protocol for an investigator-initiated, randomized, controlled, multicenter clinical trial |
title_full_unstemmed | Natural vs. programmed cycles for frozen embryo transfer: study protocol for an investigator-initiated, randomized, controlled, multicenter clinical trial |
title_short | Natural vs. programmed cycles for frozen embryo transfer: study protocol for an investigator-initiated, randomized, controlled, multicenter clinical trial |
title_sort | natural vs. programmed cycles for frozen embryo transfer: study protocol for an investigator-initiated, randomized, controlled, multicenter clinical trial |
topic | Study Protocol |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8477459/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34579768 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-021-05637-3 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT bakshsheriza naturalvsprogrammedcyclesforfrozenembryotransferstudyprotocolforaninvestigatorinitiatedrandomizedcontrolledmulticenterclinicaltrial AT casperanne naturalvsprogrammedcyclesforfrozenembryotransferstudyprotocolforaninvestigatorinitiatedrandomizedcontrolledmulticenterclinicaltrial AT christiansonmindys naturalvsprogrammedcyclesforfrozenembryotransferstudyprotocolforaninvestigatorinitiatedrandomizedcontrolledmulticenterclinicaltrial AT devinekate naturalvsprogrammedcyclesforfrozenembryotransferstudyprotocolforaninvestigatorinitiatedrandomizedcontrolledmulticenterclinicaltrial AT doodykevinj naturalvsprogrammedcyclesforfrozenembryotransferstudyprotocolforaninvestigatorinitiatedrandomizedcontrolledmulticenterclinicaltrial AT ehrhardtstephan naturalvsprogrammedcyclesforfrozenembryotransferstudyprotocolforaninvestigatorinitiatedrandomizedcontrolledmulticenterclinicaltrial AT hansenkarlr naturalvsprogrammedcyclesforfrozenembryotransferstudyprotocolforaninvestigatorinitiatedrandomizedcontrolledmulticenterclinicaltrial AT lathiruthb naturalvsprogrammedcyclesforfrozenembryotransferstudyprotocolforaninvestigatorinitiatedrandomizedcontrolledmulticenterclinicaltrial AT timbofatmata naturalvsprogrammedcyclesforfrozenembryotransferstudyprotocolforaninvestigatorinitiatedrandomizedcontrolledmulticenterclinicaltrial AT usadirebecca naturalvsprogrammedcyclesforfrozenembryotransferstudyprotocolforaninvestigatorinitiatedrandomizedcontrolledmulticenterclinicaltrial AT vitekwendy naturalvsprogrammedcyclesforfrozenembryotransferstudyprotocolforaninvestigatorinitiatedrandomizedcontrolledmulticenterclinicaltrial AT shadedavidm naturalvsprogrammedcyclesforfrozenembryotransferstudyprotocolforaninvestigatorinitiatedrandomizedcontrolledmulticenterclinicaltrial AT segarsjames naturalvsprogrammedcyclesforfrozenembryotransferstudyprotocolforaninvestigatorinitiatedrandomizedcontrolledmulticenterclinicaltrial AT bakervaleriel naturalvsprogrammedcyclesforfrozenembryotransferstudyprotocolforaninvestigatorinitiatedrandomizedcontrolledmulticenterclinicaltrial AT naturalvsprogrammedcyclesforfrozenembryotransferstudyprotocolforaninvestigatorinitiatedrandomizedcontrolledmulticenterclinicaltrial |