Cargando…

Meta‐analysis: Congruence of genomic and phenotypic differentiation across diverse natural study systems

Linking genotype to phenotype is a primary goal for understanding the genomic underpinnings of evolution. However, little work has explored whether patterns of linked genomic and phenotypic differentiation are congruent across natural study systems and traits. Here, we investigate such patterns with...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wood, Zachary T., Wiegardt, Andrew K., Barton, Kayla L., Clark, Jonathan D., Homola, Jared J., Olsen, Brian J., King, Benjamin L., Kovach, Adrienne I., Kinnison, Michael T.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8477602/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34603492
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/eva.13264
_version_ 1784575877489623040
author Wood, Zachary T.
Wiegardt, Andrew K.
Barton, Kayla L.
Clark, Jonathan D.
Homola, Jared J.
Olsen, Brian J.
King, Benjamin L.
Kovach, Adrienne I.
Kinnison, Michael T.
author_facet Wood, Zachary T.
Wiegardt, Andrew K.
Barton, Kayla L.
Clark, Jonathan D.
Homola, Jared J.
Olsen, Brian J.
King, Benjamin L.
Kovach, Adrienne I.
Kinnison, Michael T.
author_sort Wood, Zachary T.
collection PubMed
description Linking genotype to phenotype is a primary goal for understanding the genomic underpinnings of evolution. However, little work has explored whether patterns of linked genomic and phenotypic differentiation are congruent across natural study systems and traits. Here, we investigate such patterns with a meta‐analysis of studies examining population‐level differentiation at subsets of loci and traits putatively responding to divergent selection. We show that across the 31 studies (88 natural population‐level comparisons) we examined, there was a moderate (R (2) = 0.39) relationship between genomic differentiation (F (ST)) and phenotypic differentiation (P(ST) ) for loci and traits putatively under selection. This quantitative relationship between P (ST) and F (ST) for loci under selection in diverse taxa provides broad context and cross‐system predictions for genomic and phenotypic adaptation by natural selection in natural populations. This context may eventually allow for more precise ideas of what constitutes “strong” differentiation, predictions about the effect size of loci, comparisons of taxa evolving in nonparallel ways, and more. On the other hand, links between P (ST) and F (ST) within studies were very weak, suggesting that much work remains in linking genomic differentiation to phenotypic differentiation at specific phenotypes. We suggest that linking genotypes to specific phenotypes can be improved by correlating genomic and phenotypic differentiation across a spectrum of diverging populations within a taxon and including wide coverage of both genomes and phenomes.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8477602
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-84776022021-10-01 Meta‐analysis: Congruence of genomic and phenotypic differentiation across diverse natural study systems Wood, Zachary T. Wiegardt, Andrew K. Barton, Kayla L. Clark, Jonathan D. Homola, Jared J. Olsen, Brian J. King, Benjamin L. Kovach, Adrienne I. Kinnison, Michael T. Evol Appl Original Articles Linking genotype to phenotype is a primary goal for understanding the genomic underpinnings of evolution. However, little work has explored whether patterns of linked genomic and phenotypic differentiation are congruent across natural study systems and traits. Here, we investigate such patterns with a meta‐analysis of studies examining population‐level differentiation at subsets of loci and traits putatively responding to divergent selection. We show that across the 31 studies (88 natural population‐level comparisons) we examined, there was a moderate (R (2) = 0.39) relationship between genomic differentiation (F (ST)) and phenotypic differentiation (P(ST) ) for loci and traits putatively under selection. This quantitative relationship between P (ST) and F (ST) for loci under selection in diverse taxa provides broad context and cross‐system predictions for genomic and phenotypic adaptation by natural selection in natural populations. This context may eventually allow for more precise ideas of what constitutes “strong” differentiation, predictions about the effect size of loci, comparisons of taxa evolving in nonparallel ways, and more. On the other hand, links between P (ST) and F (ST) within studies were very weak, suggesting that much work remains in linking genomic differentiation to phenotypic differentiation at specific phenotypes. We suggest that linking genotypes to specific phenotypes can be improved by correlating genomic and phenotypic differentiation across a spectrum of diverging populations within a taxon and including wide coverage of both genomes and phenomes. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021-08-19 /pmc/articles/PMC8477602/ /pubmed/34603492 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/eva.13264 Text en © 2021 The Authors. Evolutionary Applications published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Wood, Zachary T.
Wiegardt, Andrew K.
Barton, Kayla L.
Clark, Jonathan D.
Homola, Jared J.
Olsen, Brian J.
King, Benjamin L.
Kovach, Adrienne I.
Kinnison, Michael T.
Meta‐analysis: Congruence of genomic and phenotypic differentiation across diverse natural study systems
title Meta‐analysis: Congruence of genomic and phenotypic differentiation across diverse natural study systems
title_full Meta‐analysis: Congruence of genomic and phenotypic differentiation across diverse natural study systems
title_fullStr Meta‐analysis: Congruence of genomic and phenotypic differentiation across diverse natural study systems
title_full_unstemmed Meta‐analysis: Congruence of genomic and phenotypic differentiation across diverse natural study systems
title_short Meta‐analysis: Congruence of genomic and phenotypic differentiation across diverse natural study systems
title_sort meta‐analysis: congruence of genomic and phenotypic differentiation across diverse natural study systems
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8477602/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34603492
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/eva.13264
work_keys_str_mv AT woodzacharyt metaanalysiscongruenceofgenomicandphenotypicdifferentiationacrossdiversenaturalstudysystems
AT wiegardtandrewk metaanalysiscongruenceofgenomicandphenotypicdifferentiationacrossdiversenaturalstudysystems
AT bartonkaylal metaanalysiscongruenceofgenomicandphenotypicdifferentiationacrossdiversenaturalstudysystems
AT clarkjonathand metaanalysiscongruenceofgenomicandphenotypicdifferentiationacrossdiversenaturalstudysystems
AT homolajaredj metaanalysiscongruenceofgenomicandphenotypicdifferentiationacrossdiversenaturalstudysystems
AT olsenbrianj metaanalysiscongruenceofgenomicandphenotypicdifferentiationacrossdiversenaturalstudysystems
AT kingbenjaminl metaanalysiscongruenceofgenomicandphenotypicdifferentiationacrossdiversenaturalstudysystems
AT kovachadriennei metaanalysiscongruenceofgenomicandphenotypicdifferentiationacrossdiversenaturalstudysystems
AT kinnisonmichaelt metaanalysiscongruenceofgenomicandphenotypicdifferentiationacrossdiversenaturalstudysystems