Cargando…

On incoherent diffractive imaging

Incoherent diffractive imaging (IDI) promises structural analysis with atomic resolution based on intensity interferometry of pulsed X-ray fluorescence emission. However, its experimental realization is still pending and a comprehensive theory of contrast formation has not been established to date....

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lohse, Leon M., Vassholz, Malte, Salditt, Tim
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: International Union of Crystallography 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8477639/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34473101
http://dx.doi.org/10.1107/S2053273321007300
_version_ 1784575884135497728
author Lohse, Leon M.
Vassholz, Malte
Salditt, Tim
author_facet Lohse, Leon M.
Vassholz, Malte
Salditt, Tim
author_sort Lohse, Leon M.
collection PubMed
description Incoherent diffractive imaging (IDI) promises structural analysis with atomic resolution based on intensity interferometry of pulsed X-ray fluorescence emission. However, its experimental realization is still pending and a comprehensive theory of contrast formation has not been established to date. Explicit expressions are derived for the equal-pulse two-point intensity correlations, as the principal measured quantity of IDI, with full control of the prefactors, based on a simple model of stochastic fluorescence emission. The model considers the photon detection statistics, the finite temporal coherence of the individual emissions, as well as the geometry of the scattering volume. The implications are interpreted in view of the most relevant quantities, including the fluorescence lifetime, the excitation pulse, as well as the extent of the scattering volume and pixel size. Importantly, the spatiotemporal overlap between any two emissions in the sample can be identified as a crucial factor limiting the contrast and its dependency on the sample size can be derived. The paper gives rigorous estimates for the optimum sample size, the maximum photon yield and the expected signal-to-noise ratio under optimal conditions. Based on these estimates, the feasibility of IDI experiments for plausible experimental parameters is discussed. It is shown in particular that the mean number of photons per detector pixel which can be achieved with X-ray fluorescence is severely limited and as a consequence imposes restrictive constraints on possible applications.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8477639
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher International Union of Crystallography
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-84776392021-10-04 On incoherent diffractive imaging Lohse, Leon M. Vassholz, Malte Salditt, Tim Acta Crystallogr A Found Adv Research Papers Incoherent diffractive imaging (IDI) promises structural analysis with atomic resolution based on intensity interferometry of pulsed X-ray fluorescence emission. However, its experimental realization is still pending and a comprehensive theory of contrast formation has not been established to date. Explicit expressions are derived for the equal-pulse two-point intensity correlations, as the principal measured quantity of IDI, with full control of the prefactors, based on a simple model of stochastic fluorescence emission. The model considers the photon detection statistics, the finite temporal coherence of the individual emissions, as well as the geometry of the scattering volume. The implications are interpreted in view of the most relevant quantities, including the fluorescence lifetime, the excitation pulse, as well as the extent of the scattering volume and pixel size. Importantly, the spatiotemporal overlap between any two emissions in the sample can be identified as a crucial factor limiting the contrast and its dependency on the sample size can be derived. The paper gives rigorous estimates for the optimum sample size, the maximum photon yield and the expected signal-to-noise ratio under optimal conditions. Based on these estimates, the feasibility of IDI experiments for plausible experimental parameters is discussed. It is shown in particular that the mean number of photons per detector pixel which can be achieved with X-ray fluorescence is severely limited and as a consequence imposes restrictive constraints on possible applications. International Union of Crystallography 2021-08-27 /pmc/articles/PMC8477639/ /pubmed/34473101 http://dx.doi.org/10.1107/S2053273321007300 Text en © Leon M. Lohse et al. 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) Licence, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original authors and source are cited.
spellingShingle Research Papers
Lohse, Leon M.
Vassholz, Malte
Salditt, Tim
On incoherent diffractive imaging
title On incoherent diffractive imaging
title_full On incoherent diffractive imaging
title_fullStr On incoherent diffractive imaging
title_full_unstemmed On incoherent diffractive imaging
title_short On incoherent diffractive imaging
title_sort on incoherent diffractive imaging
topic Research Papers
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8477639/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34473101
http://dx.doi.org/10.1107/S2053273321007300
work_keys_str_mv AT lohseleonm onincoherentdiffractiveimaging
AT vassholzmalte onincoherentdiffractiveimaging
AT salditttim onincoherentdiffractiveimaging