Cargando…
The State of Morning Report in the Current Healthcare Landscape: a National Survey of Internal Medicine Program Directors
BACKGROUND: Case-based Morning Report (MR) has long been the predominant educational conference in Internal Medicine (IM) residency programs. The last comprehensive survey of IM MR was in 1986. Much has changed in the healthcare landscape since 1986 that may impact MR. OBJECTIVE: We sought to determ...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer International Publishing
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8477724/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34585310 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11606-021-07010-1 |
_version_ | 1784575903049711616 |
---|---|
author | Lessing, Juan N. McGarry, Kelly Schiffman, Fred Austin, Matthew Hepokoski, Mark Keniston, Angela Tammaro, Dominick Finn, Kathleen M. |
author_facet | Lessing, Juan N. McGarry, Kelly Schiffman, Fred Austin, Matthew Hepokoski, Mark Keniston, Angela Tammaro, Dominick Finn, Kathleen M. |
author_sort | Lessing, Juan N. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Case-based Morning Report (MR) has long been the predominant educational conference in Internal Medicine (IM) residency programs. The last comprehensive survey of IM MR was in 1986. Much has changed in the healthcare landscape since 1986 that may impact MR. OBJECTIVE: We sought to determine the current state of MR across all US IM programs. DESIGN: In 2018, US IM program directors (PDs) were surveyed about the dynamics of MR at their institutions, perceived pressures, and realized changes. KEY RESULTS: The response rate was 70.2% (275/392). MR remains highly prevalent (97.5% of programs), although held less frequently (mean 3.9 days/week, SD 1.2), for less time (mean 49.4 min, SD 12.3), and often later in the day compared to 1986. MR attendees have changed, with more diversity of learners but less presence of educational leaders. PD presence at MR is associated with increased resident attendance (high attendance: 78% vs 61%, p=0.0062) and punctuality (strongly agree/agree: 59% vs 43%, p=0.0161). The most cited goal for MR is utilizing cases to practice clinical reasoning. Nearly 40% of PDs feel pressure to move or cancel MR; of those, 61.2% have done so, most commonly changing the timing (48.5%), reducing the length (18.4%), and reducing the number of sessions per week (11.7%). Compared to community-based and to community-based, university-affiliated programs, university-based programs have 2.9 times greater odds (95% CI: 1.3, 6.9; p = 0.0081) and 2.5 times greater odds (95% CI 1.5, 4.4; p =0.0007), respectively, of holding MR after 9 AM, and 1.8 times greater odds (95% CI: 0.8, 4.2; p = 0.1367) and 2.0 times greater odds (95% CI: 1.2, 3.5; p = 0.0117), respectively, of reporting pressure to cancel or move MR compared to their counterparts. CONCLUSIONS: While MR ubiquity reflects its continued perceived value, PDs have modified MR to accommodate changes in the healthcare environment. This includes reduced frequency, shorter length, and moving conferences later in the day. Additional studies are needed to understand how these changes impact learning. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s11606-021-07010-1. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8477724 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Springer International Publishing |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-84777242021-09-28 The State of Morning Report in the Current Healthcare Landscape: a National Survey of Internal Medicine Program Directors Lessing, Juan N. McGarry, Kelly Schiffman, Fred Austin, Matthew Hepokoski, Mark Keniston, Angela Tammaro, Dominick Finn, Kathleen M. J Gen Intern Med Original Research BACKGROUND: Case-based Morning Report (MR) has long been the predominant educational conference in Internal Medicine (IM) residency programs. The last comprehensive survey of IM MR was in 1986. Much has changed in the healthcare landscape since 1986 that may impact MR. OBJECTIVE: We sought to determine the current state of MR across all US IM programs. DESIGN: In 2018, US IM program directors (PDs) were surveyed about the dynamics of MR at their institutions, perceived pressures, and realized changes. KEY RESULTS: The response rate was 70.2% (275/392). MR remains highly prevalent (97.5% of programs), although held less frequently (mean 3.9 days/week, SD 1.2), for less time (mean 49.4 min, SD 12.3), and often later in the day compared to 1986. MR attendees have changed, with more diversity of learners but less presence of educational leaders. PD presence at MR is associated with increased resident attendance (high attendance: 78% vs 61%, p=0.0062) and punctuality (strongly agree/agree: 59% vs 43%, p=0.0161). The most cited goal for MR is utilizing cases to practice clinical reasoning. Nearly 40% of PDs feel pressure to move or cancel MR; of those, 61.2% have done so, most commonly changing the timing (48.5%), reducing the length (18.4%), and reducing the number of sessions per week (11.7%). Compared to community-based and to community-based, university-affiliated programs, university-based programs have 2.9 times greater odds (95% CI: 1.3, 6.9; p = 0.0081) and 2.5 times greater odds (95% CI 1.5, 4.4; p =0.0007), respectively, of holding MR after 9 AM, and 1.8 times greater odds (95% CI: 0.8, 4.2; p = 0.1367) and 2.0 times greater odds (95% CI: 1.2, 3.5; p = 0.0117), respectively, of reporting pressure to cancel or move MR compared to their counterparts. CONCLUSIONS: While MR ubiquity reflects its continued perceived value, PDs have modified MR to accommodate changes in the healthcare environment. This includes reduced frequency, shorter length, and moving conferences later in the day. Additional studies are needed to understand how these changes impact learning. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s11606-021-07010-1. Springer International Publishing 2021-09-28 2022-05 /pmc/articles/PMC8477724/ /pubmed/34585310 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11606-021-07010-1 Text en © Society of General Internal Medicine 2021 |
spellingShingle | Original Research Lessing, Juan N. McGarry, Kelly Schiffman, Fred Austin, Matthew Hepokoski, Mark Keniston, Angela Tammaro, Dominick Finn, Kathleen M. The State of Morning Report in the Current Healthcare Landscape: a National Survey of Internal Medicine Program Directors |
title |
The State of Morning Report in the Current Healthcare Landscape: a National Survey of Internal Medicine Program Directors |
title_full |
The State of Morning Report in the Current Healthcare Landscape: a National Survey of Internal Medicine Program Directors |
title_fullStr |
The State of Morning Report in the Current Healthcare Landscape: a National Survey of Internal Medicine Program Directors |
title_full_unstemmed |
The State of Morning Report in the Current Healthcare Landscape: a National Survey of Internal Medicine Program Directors |
title_short |
The State of Morning Report in the Current Healthcare Landscape: a National Survey of Internal Medicine Program Directors |
title_sort | state of morning report in the current healthcare landscape: a national survey of internal medicine program directors |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8477724/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34585310 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11606-021-07010-1 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT lessingjuann thestateofmorningreportinthecurrenthealthcarelandscapeanationalsurveyofinternalmedicineprogramdirectors AT mcgarrykelly thestateofmorningreportinthecurrenthealthcarelandscapeanationalsurveyofinternalmedicineprogramdirectors AT schiffmanfred thestateofmorningreportinthecurrenthealthcarelandscapeanationalsurveyofinternalmedicineprogramdirectors AT austinmatthew thestateofmorningreportinthecurrenthealthcarelandscapeanationalsurveyofinternalmedicineprogramdirectors AT hepokoskimark thestateofmorningreportinthecurrenthealthcarelandscapeanationalsurveyofinternalmedicineprogramdirectors AT kenistonangela thestateofmorningreportinthecurrenthealthcarelandscapeanationalsurveyofinternalmedicineprogramdirectors AT tammarodominick thestateofmorningreportinthecurrenthealthcarelandscapeanationalsurveyofinternalmedicineprogramdirectors AT finnkathleenm thestateofmorningreportinthecurrenthealthcarelandscapeanationalsurveyofinternalmedicineprogramdirectors AT lessingjuann stateofmorningreportinthecurrenthealthcarelandscapeanationalsurveyofinternalmedicineprogramdirectors AT mcgarrykelly stateofmorningreportinthecurrenthealthcarelandscapeanationalsurveyofinternalmedicineprogramdirectors AT schiffmanfred stateofmorningreportinthecurrenthealthcarelandscapeanationalsurveyofinternalmedicineprogramdirectors AT austinmatthew stateofmorningreportinthecurrenthealthcarelandscapeanationalsurveyofinternalmedicineprogramdirectors AT hepokoskimark stateofmorningreportinthecurrenthealthcarelandscapeanationalsurveyofinternalmedicineprogramdirectors AT kenistonangela stateofmorningreportinthecurrenthealthcarelandscapeanationalsurveyofinternalmedicineprogramdirectors AT tammarodominick stateofmorningreportinthecurrenthealthcarelandscapeanationalsurveyofinternalmedicineprogramdirectors AT finnkathleenm stateofmorningreportinthecurrenthealthcarelandscapeanationalsurveyofinternalmedicineprogramdirectors |