Cargando…

The State of Morning Report in the Current Healthcare Landscape: a National Survey of Internal Medicine Program Directors

BACKGROUND: Case-based Morning Report (MR) has long been the predominant educational conference in Internal Medicine (IM) residency programs. The last comprehensive survey of IM MR was in 1986. Much has changed in the healthcare landscape since 1986 that may impact MR. OBJECTIVE: We sought to determ...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lessing, Juan N., McGarry, Kelly, Schiffman, Fred, Austin, Matthew, Hepokoski, Mark, Keniston, Angela, Tammaro, Dominick, Finn, Kathleen M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8477724/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34585310
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11606-021-07010-1
_version_ 1784575903049711616
author Lessing, Juan N.
McGarry, Kelly
Schiffman, Fred
Austin, Matthew
Hepokoski, Mark
Keniston, Angela
Tammaro, Dominick
Finn, Kathleen M.
author_facet Lessing, Juan N.
McGarry, Kelly
Schiffman, Fred
Austin, Matthew
Hepokoski, Mark
Keniston, Angela
Tammaro, Dominick
Finn, Kathleen M.
author_sort Lessing, Juan N.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Case-based Morning Report (MR) has long been the predominant educational conference in Internal Medicine (IM) residency programs. The last comprehensive survey of IM MR was in 1986. Much has changed in the healthcare landscape since 1986 that may impact MR. OBJECTIVE: We sought to determine the current state of MR across all US IM programs. DESIGN: In 2018, US IM program directors (PDs) were surveyed about the dynamics of MR at their institutions, perceived pressures, and realized changes. KEY RESULTS: The response rate was 70.2% (275/392). MR remains highly prevalent (97.5% of programs), although held less frequently (mean 3.9 days/week, SD 1.2), for less time (mean 49.4 min, SD 12.3), and often later in the day compared to 1986. MR attendees have changed, with more diversity of learners but less presence of educational leaders. PD presence at MR is associated with increased resident attendance (high attendance: 78% vs 61%, p=0.0062) and punctuality (strongly agree/agree: 59% vs 43%, p=0.0161). The most cited goal for MR is utilizing cases to practice clinical reasoning. Nearly 40% of PDs feel pressure to move or cancel MR; of those, 61.2% have done so, most commonly changing the timing (48.5%), reducing the length (18.4%), and reducing the number of sessions per week (11.7%). Compared to community-based and to community-based, university-affiliated programs, university-based programs have 2.9 times greater odds (95% CI: 1.3, 6.9; p = 0.0081) and 2.5 times greater odds (95% CI 1.5, 4.4; p =0.0007), respectively, of holding MR after 9 AM, and 1.8 times greater odds (95% CI: 0.8, 4.2; p = 0.1367) and 2.0 times greater odds (95% CI: 1.2, 3.5; p = 0.0117), respectively, of reporting pressure to cancel or move MR compared to their counterparts. CONCLUSIONS: While MR ubiquity reflects its continued perceived value, PDs have modified MR to accommodate changes in the healthcare environment. This includes reduced frequency, shorter length, and moving conferences later in the day. Additional studies are needed to understand how these changes impact learning. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s11606-021-07010-1.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8477724
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Springer International Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-84777242021-09-28 The State of Morning Report in the Current Healthcare Landscape: a National Survey of Internal Medicine Program Directors Lessing, Juan N. McGarry, Kelly Schiffman, Fred Austin, Matthew Hepokoski, Mark Keniston, Angela Tammaro, Dominick Finn, Kathleen M. J Gen Intern Med Original Research BACKGROUND: Case-based Morning Report (MR) has long been the predominant educational conference in Internal Medicine (IM) residency programs. The last comprehensive survey of IM MR was in 1986. Much has changed in the healthcare landscape since 1986 that may impact MR. OBJECTIVE: We sought to determine the current state of MR across all US IM programs. DESIGN: In 2018, US IM program directors (PDs) were surveyed about the dynamics of MR at their institutions, perceived pressures, and realized changes. KEY RESULTS: The response rate was 70.2% (275/392). MR remains highly prevalent (97.5% of programs), although held less frequently (mean 3.9 days/week, SD 1.2), for less time (mean 49.4 min, SD 12.3), and often later in the day compared to 1986. MR attendees have changed, with more diversity of learners but less presence of educational leaders. PD presence at MR is associated with increased resident attendance (high attendance: 78% vs 61%, p=0.0062) and punctuality (strongly agree/agree: 59% vs 43%, p=0.0161). The most cited goal for MR is utilizing cases to practice clinical reasoning. Nearly 40% of PDs feel pressure to move or cancel MR; of those, 61.2% have done so, most commonly changing the timing (48.5%), reducing the length (18.4%), and reducing the number of sessions per week (11.7%). Compared to community-based and to community-based, university-affiliated programs, university-based programs have 2.9 times greater odds (95% CI: 1.3, 6.9; p = 0.0081) and 2.5 times greater odds (95% CI 1.5, 4.4; p =0.0007), respectively, of holding MR after 9 AM, and 1.8 times greater odds (95% CI: 0.8, 4.2; p = 0.1367) and 2.0 times greater odds (95% CI: 1.2, 3.5; p = 0.0117), respectively, of reporting pressure to cancel or move MR compared to their counterparts. CONCLUSIONS: While MR ubiquity reflects its continued perceived value, PDs have modified MR to accommodate changes in the healthcare environment. This includes reduced frequency, shorter length, and moving conferences later in the day. Additional studies are needed to understand how these changes impact learning. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s11606-021-07010-1. Springer International Publishing 2021-09-28 2022-05 /pmc/articles/PMC8477724/ /pubmed/34585310 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11606-021-07010-1 Text en © Society of General Internal Medicine 2021
spellingShingle Original Research
Lessing, Juan N.
McGarry, Kelly
Schiffman, Fred
Austin, Matthew
Hepokoski, Mark
Keniston, Angela
Tammaro, Dominick
Finn, Kathleen M.
The State of Morning Report in the Current Healthcare Landscape: a National Survey of Internal Medicine Program Directors
title The State of Morning Report in the Current Healthcare Landscape: a National Survey of Internal Medicine Program Directors
title_full The State of Morning Report in the Current Healthcare Landscape: a National Survey of Internal Medicine Program Directors
title_fullStr The State of Morning Report in the Current Healthcare Landscape: a National Survey of Internal Medicine Program Directors
title_full_unstemmed The State of Morning Report in the Current Healthcare Landscape: a National Survey of Internal Medicine Program Directors
title_short The State of Morning Report in the Current Healthcare Landscape: a National Survey of Internal Medicine Program Directors
title_sort state of morning report in the current healthcare landscape: a national survey of internal medicine program directors
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8477724/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34585310
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11606-021-07010-1
work_keys_str_mv AT lessingjuann thestateofmorningreportinthecurrenthealthcarelandscapeanationalsurveyofinternalmedicineprogramdirectors
AT mcgarrykelly thestateofmorningreportinthecurrenthealthcarelandscapeanationalsurveyofinternalmedicineprogramdirectors
AT schiffmanfred thestateofmorningreportinthecurrenthealthcarelandscapeanationalsurveyofinternalmedicineprogramdirectors
AT austinmatthew thestateofmorningreportinthecurrenthealthcarelandscapeanationalsurveyofinternalmedicineprogramdirectors
AT hepokoskimark thestateofmorningreportinthecurrenthealthcarelandscapeanationalsurveyofinternalmedicineprogramdirectors
AT kenistonangela thestateofmorningreportinthecurrenthealthcarelandscapeanationalsurveyofinternalmedicineprogramdirectors
AT tammarodominick thestateofmorningreportinthecurrenthealthcarelandscapeanationalsurveyofinternalmedicineprogramdirectors
AT finnkathleenm thestateofmorningreportinthecurrenthealthcarelandscapeanationalsurveyofinternalmedicineprogramdirectors
AT lessingjuann stateofmorningreportinthecurrenthealthcarelandscapeanationalsurveyofinternalmedicineprogramdirectors
AT mcgarrykelly stateofmorningreportinthecurrenthealthcarelandscapeanationalsurveyofinternalmedicineprogramdirectors
AT schiffmanfred stateofmorningreportinthecurrenthealthcarelandscapeanationalsurveyofinternalmedicineprogramdirectors
AT austinmatthew stateofmorningreportinthecurrenthealthcarelandscapeanationalsurveyofinternalmedicineprogramdirectors
AT hepokoskimark stateofmorningreportinthecurrenthealthcarelandscapeanationalsurveyofinternalmedicineprogramdirectors
AT kenistonangela stateofmorningreportinthecurrenthealthcarelandscapeanationalsurveyofinternalmedicineprogramdirectors
AT tammarodominick stateofmorningreportinthecurrenthealthcarelandscapeanationalsurveyofinternalmedicineprogramdirectors
AT finnkathleenm stateofmorningreportinthecurrenthealthcarelandscapeanationalsurveyofinternalmedicineprogramdirectors