Cargando…
The trends of obstetric anesthesia practice: In a tertiary care center in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
INTRODUCTION: Obstetric anesthesia provides several methods for the analgesia of labor pain. The neuraxial technique is considered the standard of care for parturient women. The epidural block is widely used in vaginal delivery while the spinal block is the preferred method for cesarean section (C-s...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Wolters Kluwer - Medknow
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8477770/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34658723 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/sja.sja_83_21 |
_version_ | 1784575913193635840 |
---|---|
author | Alshabibi, Mohammed Madkhali, Azza M. Alkinani, Amer A. Alyami, Ali A. Alatassi, Abdulaleem |
author_facet | Alshabibi, Mohammed Madkhali, Azza M. Alkinani, Amer A. Alyami, Ali A. Alatassi, Abdulaleem |
author_sort | Alshabibi, Mohammed |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: Obstetric anesthesia provides several methods for the analgesia of labor pain. The neuraxial technique is considered the standard of care for parturient women. The epidural block is widely used in vaginal delivery while the spinal block is the preferred method for cesarean section (C-section). We aim to know the practice of obstetric anesthesia in our center. METHODS: A retrospective cross-sectional study was conducted at a tertiary center in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. The data of all delivery cases from 1/7/2019 to 30/9/2019 were reviewed. RESULTS: We identified a total of 2,140 cases during the 3 months, vaginal delivery was the most common with 72.4% (1550) while the C-section cases were 27.6% (590). Regarding the type of analgesia/anesthesia for vaginal deliveries, intramuscular analgesia was the commonest group with 34.8% (540), followed by the group of ladies who did not receive any analgesia/anesthesia with 31.9% (495), thirdly was epidural cases with 31.8% (493), and the fourth type was spinal 0.6% (10). Regarding C-section, the emergency cases were 65.4% (386). The types of anesthesia for all C-sections were as follows spinal 63.5% (375), GA 23.8% (141), and epidural 12% (74). Regarding anesthesia for elective cases, spinal was 85% (174), GA 14% (28), and epidural 1% (2). Regarding anesthesia for emergency cases, spinal was 52% (201), GA 29% (113), and epidural 19% (72). CONCLUSIONS: The use of epidural was low, and the spinal use was relatively on par if we compare with leading western countries. More focused studies and multicenter studies are needed in the country. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8477770 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Wolters Kluwer - Medknow |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-84777702021-10-15 The trends of obstetric anesthesia practice: In a tertiary care center in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia Alshabibi, Mohammed Madkhali, Azza M. Alkinani, Amer A. Alyami, Ali A. Alatassi, Abdulaleem Saudi J Anaesth Original Article INTRODUCTION: Obstetric anesthesia provides several methods for the analgesia of labor pain. The neuraxial technique is considered the standard of care for parturient women. The epidural block is widely used in vaginal delivery while the spinal block is the preferred method for cesarean section (C-section). We aim to know the practice of obstetric anesthesia in our center. METHODS: A retrospective cross-sectional study was conducted at a tertiary center in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. The data of all delivery cases from 1/7/2019 to 30/9/2019 were reviewed. RESULTS: We identified a total of 2,140 cases during the 3 months, vaginal delivery was the most common with 72.4% (1550) while the C-section cases were 27.6% (590). Regarding the type of analgesia/anesthesia for vaginal deliveries, intramuscular analgesia was the commonest group with 34.8% (540), followed by the group of ladies who did not receive any analgesia/anesthesia with 31.9% (495), thirdly was epidural cases with 31.8% (493), and the fourth type was spinal 0.6% (10). Regarding C-section, the emergency cases were 65.4% (386). The types of anesthesia for all C-sections were as follows spinal 63.5% (375), GA 23.8% (141), and epidural 12% (74). Regarding anesthesia for elective cases, spinal was 85% (174), GA 14% (28), and epidural 1% (2). Regarding anesthesia for emergency cases, spinal was 52% (201), GA 29% (113), and epidural 19% (72). CONCLUSIONS: The use of epidural was low, and the spinal use was relatively on par if we compare with leading western countries. More focused studies and multicenter studies are needed in the country. Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2021 2021-09-02 /pmc/articles/PMC8477770/ /pubmed/34658723 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/sja.sja_83_21 Text en Copyright: © 2021 Saudi Journal of Anaesthesia https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Alshabibi, Mohammed Madkhali, Azza M. Alkinani, Amer A. Alyami, Ali A. Alatassi, Abdulaleem The trends of obstetric anesthesia practice: In a tertiary care center in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia |
title | The trends of obstetric anesthesia practice: In a tertiary care center in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia |
title_full | The trends of obstetric anesthesia practice: In a tertiary care center in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia |
title_fullStr | The trends of obstetric anesthesia practice: In a tertiary care center in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia |
title_full_unstemmed | The trends of obstetric anesthesia practice: In a tertiary care center in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia |
title_short | The trends of obstetric anesthesia practice: In a tertiary care center in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia |
title_sort | trends of obstetric anesthesia practice: in a tertiary care center in the kingdom of saudi arabia |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8477770/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34658723 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/sja.sja_83_21 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT alshabibimohammed thetrendsofobstetricanesthesiapracticeinatertiarycarecenterinthekingdomofsaudiarabia AT madkhaliazzam thetrendsofobstetricanesthesiapracticeinatertiarycarecenterinthekingdomofsaudiarabia AT alkinaniamera thetrendsofobstetricanesthesiapracticeinatertiarycarecenterinthekingdomofsaudiarabia AT alyamialia thetrendsofobstetricanesthesiapracticeinatertiarycarecenterinthekingdomofsaudiarabia AT alatassiabdulaleem thetrendsofobstetricanesthesiapracticeinatertiarycarecenterinthekingdomofsaudiarabia AT alshabibimohammed trendsofobstetricanesthesiapracticeinatertiarycarecenterinthekingdomofsaudiarabia AT madkhaliazzam trendsofobstetricanesthesiapracticeinatertiarycarecenterinthekingdomofsaudiarabia AT alkinaniamera trendsofobstetricanesthesiapracticeinatertiarycarecenterinthekingdomofsaudiarabia AT alyamialia trendsofobstetricanesthesiapracticeinatertiarycarecenterinthekingdomofsaudiarabia AT alatassiabdulaleem trendsofobstetricanesthesiapracticeinatertiarycarecenterinthekingdomofsaudiarabia |