Cargando…

The trends of obstetric anesthesia practice: In a tertiary care center in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia

INTRODUCTION: Obstetric anesthesia provides several methods for the analgesia of labor pain. The neuraxial technique is considered the standard of care for parturient women. The epidural block is widely used in vaginal delivery while the spinal block is the preferred method for cesarean section (C-s...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Alshabibi, Mohammed, Madkhali, Azza M., Alkinani, Amer A., Alyami, Ali A., Alatassi, Abdulaleem
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8477770/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34658723
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/sja.sja_83_21
_version_ 1784575913193635840
author Alshabibi, Mohammed
Madkhali, Azza M.
Alkinani, Amer A.
Alyami, Ali A.
Alatassi, Abdulaleem
author_facet Alshabibi, Mohammed
Madkhali, Azza M.
Alkinani, Amer A.
Alyami, Ali A.
Alatassi, Abdulaleem
author_sort Alshabibi, Mohammed
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Obstetric anesthesia provides several methods for the analgesia of labor pain. The neuraxial technique is considered the standard of care for parturient women. The epidural block is widely used in vaginal delivery while the spinal block is the preferred method for cesarean section (C-section). We aim to know the practice of obstetric anesthesia in our center. METHODS: A retrospective cross-sectional study was conducted at a tertiary center in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. The data of all delivery cases from 1/7/2019 to 30/9/2019 were reviewed. RESULTS: We identified a total of 2,140 cases during the 3 months, vaginal delivery was the most common with 72.4% (1550) while the C-section cases were 27.6% (590). Regarding the type of analgesia/anesthesia for vaginal deliveries, intramuscular analgesia was the commonest group with 34.8% (540), followed by the group of ladies who did not receive any analgesia/anesthesia with 31.9% (495), thirdly was epidural cases with 31.8% (493), and the fourth type was spinal 0.6% (10). Regarding C-section, the emergency cases were 65.4% (386). The types of anesthesia for all C-sections were as follows spinal 63.5% (375), GA 23.8% (141), and epidural 12% (74). Regarding anesthesia for elective cases, spinal was 85% (174), GA 14% (28), and epidural 1% (2). Regarding anesthesia for emergency cases, spinal was 52% (201), GA 29% (113), and epidural 19% (72). CONCLUSIONS: The use of epidural was low, and the spinal use was relatively on par if we compare with leading western countries. More focused studies and multicenter studies are needed in the country.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8477770
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Wolters Kluwer - Medknow
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-84777702021-10-15 The trends of obstetric anesthesia practice: In a tertiary care center in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia Alshabibi, Mohammed Madkhali, Azza M. Alkinani, Amer A. Alyami, Ali A. Alatassi, Abdulaleem Saudi J Anaesth Original Article INTRODUCTION: Obstetric anesthesia provides several methods for the analgesia of labor pain. The neuraxial technique is considered the standard of care for parturient women. The epidural block is widely used in vaginal delivery while the spinal block is the preferred method for cesarean section (C-section). We aim to know the practice of obstetric anesthesia in our center. METHODS: A retrospective cross-sectional study was conducted at a tertiary center in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. The data of all delivery cases from 1/7/2019 to 30/9/2019 were reviewed. RESULTS: We identified a total of 2,140 cases during the 3 months, vaginal delivery was the most common with 72.4% (1550) while the C-section cases were 27.6% (590). Regarding the type of analgesia/anesthesia for vaginal deliveries, intramuscular analgesia was the commonest group with 34.8% (540), followed by the group of ladies who did not receive any analgesia/anesthesia with 31.9% (495), thirdly was epidural cases with 31.8% (493), and the fourth type was spinal 0.6% (10). Regarding C-section, the emergency cases were 65.4% (386). The types of anesthesia for all C-sections were as follows spinal 63.5% (375), GA 23.8% (141), and epidural 12% (74). Regarding anesthesia for elective cases, spinal was 85% (174), GA 14% (28), and epidural 1% (2). Regarding anesthesia for emergency cases, spinal was 52% (201), GA 29% (113), and epidural 19% (72). CONCLUSIONS: The use of epidural was low, and the spinal use was relatively on par if we compare with leading western countries. More focused studies and multicenter studies are needed in the country. Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2021 2021-09-02 /pmc/articles/PMC8477770/ /pubmed/34658723 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/sja.sja_83_21 Text en Copyright: © 2021 Saudi Journal of Anaesthesia https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Original Article
Alshabibi, Mohammed
Madkhali, Azza M.
Alkinani, Amer A.
Alyami, Ali A.
Alatassi, Abdulaleem
The trends of obstetric anesthesia practice: In a tertiary care center in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
title The trends of obstetric anesthesia practice: In a tertiary care center in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
title_full The trends of obstetric anesthesia practice: In a tertiary care center in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
title_fullStr The trends of obstetric anesthesia practice: In a tertiary care center in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
title_full_unstemmed The trends of obstetric anesthesia practice: In a tertiary care center in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
title_short The trends of obstetric anesthesia practice: In a tertiary care center in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
title_sort trends of obstetric anesthesia practice: in a tertiary care center in the kingdom of saudi arabia
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8477770/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34658723
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/sja.sja_83_21
work_keys_str_mv AT alshabibimohammed thetrendsofobstetricanesthesiapracticeinatertiarycarecenterinthekingdomofsaudiarabia
AT madkhaliazzam thetrendsofobstetricanesthesiapracticeinatertiarycarecenterinthekingdomofsaudiarabia
AT alkinaniamera thetrendsofobstetricanesthesiapracticeinatertiarycarecenterinthekingdomofsaudiarabia
AT alyamialia thetrendsofobstetricanesthesiapracticeinatertiarycarecenterinthekingdomofsaudiarabia
AT alatassiabdulaleem thetrendsofobstetricanesthesiapracticeinatertiarycarecenterinthekingdomofsaudiarabia
AT alshabibimohammed trendsofobstetricanesthesiapracticeinatertiarycarecenterinthekingdomofsaudiarabia
AT madkhaliazzam trendsofobstetricanesthesiapracticeinatertiarycarecenterinthekingdomofsaudiarabia
AT alkinaniamera trendsofobstetricanesthesiapracticeinatertiarycarecenterinthekingdomofsaudiarabia
AT alyamialia trendsofobstetricanesthesiapracticeinatertiarycarecenterinthekingdomofsaudiarabia
AT alatassiabdulaleem trendsofobstetricanesthesiapracticeinatertiarycarecenterinthekingdomofsaudiarabia