Cargando…

An update on current EPAs in graduate medical education: A scoping review

The purpose of this scoping review is to update the recent progress of EPAs research in GME, focusing on the topical concern of EPAs effectiveness, and to provide a reference for medical researchers in countries/regions interested in introducing EPAs. Guided by Arksey and O’Malley’s framework regard...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Liu, Lu, Jiang, Zhehan, Qi, Xin, Xie, A’Na, Wu, Hongbin, Cheng, Huaqin, Wang, Weimin, Li, Haichao
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Taylor & Francis 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8477952/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34569433
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10872981.2021.1981198
_version_ 1784575953463148544
author Liu, Lu
Jiang, Zhehan
Qi, Xin
Xie, A’Na
Wu, Hongbin
Cheng, Huaqin
Wang, Weimin
Li, Haichao
author_facet Liu, Lu
Jiang, Zhehan
Qi, Xin
Xie, A’Na
Wu, Hongbin
Cheng, Huaqin
Wang, Weimin
Li, Haichao
author_sort Liu, Lu
collection PubMed
description The purpose of this scoping review is to update the recent progress of EPAs research in GME, focusing on the topical concern of EPAs effectiveness, and to provide a reference for medical researchers in countries/regions interested in introducing EPAs. Guided by Arksey and O’Malley’s framework regarding scoping reviews, the researchers, in January 2021, conducted a search in five databases to ensure the comprehensiveness of the literature. After the predetermined process, 29 articles in total were included in this study. The most common areas for the implementation and evaluation of EPAs were Surgery (n = 7,24.1%), Pediatric (n = 5,17.2%) and Internal medicine (n = 4,13.8%), a result that shows a relatively large change in the research trend of EPAs in the last two years. Prior to 2018, EPAs research focused on internal medicine, psychiatry, family medicine, and primary care. The articles in the category of EPAs implementation and evaluation had four main themes: (1) validation of EPAs (n = 16,55.2%); (2) describing the experience of implementing EPAs (n = 11,37.9%); (3) examining the factors and barriers that influence the implementation and evaluation of EPAs (n = 6,20.6%); and (4) researching the experiences of faculty, interns, and other relevant personnel in using EPAs. Training programs were the most common EPAs implementation setting (n = 26,89.6%); direct observation and evaluation (n = 12,41.4%), and evaluation by scoring reports (n = 5,17.2%) were the two most common means of assessing physicians’ EPA levels; 19 papers (65.5%) used faculty evaluation, and nine of these papers also used self-assessment (31.0%); the most frequently used tools in the evaluation of EPAs were mainly researcher-made instruments (n = 37.9%), assessment form (n = 7,24.1%), and mobile application (n = 6,20.7%). Although EPAs occupy an increasingly important place in international medical education, this study concludes that the implementation and diffusion of EPAs on a larger scale is still difficult.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8477952
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Taylor & Francis
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-84779522021-09-29 An update on current EPAs in graduate medical education: A scoping review Liu, Lu Jiang, Zhehan Qi, Xin Xie, A’Na Wu, Hongbin Cheng, Huaqin Wang, Weimin Li, Haichao Med Educ Online Review Article The purpose of this scoping review is to update the recent progress of EPAs research in GME, focusing on the topical concern of EPAs effectiveness, and to provide a reference for medical researchers in countries/regions interested in introducing EPAs. Guided by Arksey and O’Malley’s framework regarding scoping reviews, the researchers, in January 2021, conducted a search in five databases to ensure the comprehensiveness of the literature. After the predetermined process, 29 articles in total were included in this study. The most common areas for the implementation and evaluation of EPAs were Surgery (n = 7,24.1%), Pediatric (n = 5,17.2%) and Internal medicine (n = 4,13.8%), a result that shows a relatively large change in the research trend of EPAs in the last two years. Prior to 2018, EPAs research focused on internal medicine, psychiatry, family medicine, and primary care. The articles in the category of EPAs implementation and evaluation had four main themes: (1) validation of EPAs (n = 16,55.2%); (2) describing the experience of implementing EPAs (n = 11,37.9%); (3) examining the factors and barriers that influence the implementation and evaluation of EPAs (n = 6,20.6%); and (4) researching the experiences of faculty, interns, and other relevant personnel in using EPAs. Training programs were the most common EPAs implementation setting (n = 26,89.6%); direct observation and evaluation (n = 12,41.4%), and evaluation by scoring reports (n = 5,17.2%) were the two most common means of assessing physicians’ EPA levels; 19 papers (65.5%) used faculty evaluation, and nine of these papers also used self-assessment (31.0%); the most frequently used tools in the evaluation of EPAs were mainly researcher-made instruments (n = 37.9%), assessment form (n = 7,24.1%), and mobile application (n = 6,20.7%). Although EPAs occupy an increasingly important place in international medical education, this study concludes that the implementation and diffusion of EPAs on a larger scale is still difficult. Taylor & Francis 2021-09-26 /pmc/articles/PMC8477952/ /pubmed/34569433 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10872981.2021.1981198 Text en © 2021 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Review Article
Liu, Lu
Jiang, Zhehan
Qi, Xin
Xie, A’Na
Wu, Hongbin
Cheng, Huaqin
Wang, Weimin
Li, Haichao
An update on current EPAs in graduate medical education: A scoping review
title An update on current EPAs in graduate medical education: A scoping review
title_full An update on current EPAs in graduate medical education: A scoping review
title_fullStr An update on current EPAs in graduate medical education: A scoping review
title_full_unstemmed An update on current EPAs in graduate medical education: A scoping review
title_short An update on current EPAs in graduate medical education: A scoping review
title_sort update on current epas in graduate medical education: a scoping review
topic Review Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8477952/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34569433
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10872981.2021.1981198
work_keys_str_mv AT liulu anupdateoncurrentepasingraduatemedicaleducationascopingreview
AT jiangzhehan anupdateoncurrentepasingraduatemedicaleducationascopingreview
AT qixin anupdateoncurrentepasingraduatemedicaleducationascopingreview
AT xieana anupdateoncurrentepasingraduatemedicaleducationascopingreview
AT wuhongbin anupdateoncurrentepasingraduatemedicaleducationascopingreview
AT chenghuaqin anupdateoncurrentepasingraduatemedicaleducationascopingreview
AT wangweimin anupdateoncurrentepasingraduatemedicaleducationascopingreview
AT lihaichao anupdateoncurrentepasingraduatemedicaleducationascopingreview
AT liulu updateoncurrentepasingraduatemedicaleducationascopingreview
AT jiangzhehan updateoncurrentepasingraduatemedicaleducationascopingreview
AT qixin updateoncurrentepasingraduatemedicaleducationascopingreview
AT xieana updateoncurrentepasingraduatemedicaleducationascopingreview
AT wuhongbin updateoncurrentepasingraduatemedicaleducationascopingreview
AT chenghuaqin updateoncurrentepasingraduatemedicaleducationascopingreview
AT wangweimin updateoncurrentepasingraduatemedicaleducationascopingreview
AT lihaichao updateoncurrentepasingraduatemedicaleducationascopingreview