Cargando…
Mepolizumab in Hypereosinophilic Syndrome: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
We aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of mepolizumab (MEP) in the management of hypereosinophilic syndrome (HES). A systematic search was performed, and articles published until March 2021 were analyzed. The primary efficacy results evaluated were hospitalization rate related to HES, morbidit...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Faculdade de Medicina / USP
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8478134/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34644737 http://dx.doi.org/10.6061/clinics/2021/e3271 |
_version_ | 1784575988212957184 |
---|---|
author | Alves, José Mario Prota, Francisco Eduardo Villagelin, Danilo Bley, Fernanda Bernardo, Wanderley Marques |
author_facet | Alves, José Mario Prota, Francisco Eduardo Villagelin, Danilo Bley, Fernanda Bernardo, Wanderley Marques |
author_sort | Alves, José Mario |
collection | PubMed |
description | We aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of mepolizumab (MEP) in the management of hypereosinophilic syndrome (HES). A systematic search was performed, and articles published until March 2021 were analyzed. The primary efficacy results evaluated were hospitalization rate related to HES, morbidity (new or worsening), relapses/failure, treatment-related adverse effects, prednisone dosage ≤10 mg/day for ≥8 weeks, and eosinophil count <600/μL for ≥8 weeks. A meta-analysis was conducted, when appropriate. Three randomized controlled trials (RCTs), with a total of 255 patients, were included. The studies contemplated the use of MEP 300 mg/SC or 750 mg/IV. According to the evaluation of the proposed outcomes, when relapse rates/therapeutic failures were assessed, there was a 26% reduction with MEP 300 mg/SC (RD=-0.26; 95% CI: -0.44 to -0.08; p=0.04) and 48% reduction with MEP 750 mg/IV (RD=-0.48; 95% CI: -0.67, -0.30; p<0.00001). For the outcomes, prednisone dosage ≤10 mg/day for ≥8 weeks was 48% (RD=0.48; 95% CI: 0.35 to 0.62; p<0.00001), and the eosinophil count <600/μL for ≥8 weeks was 51% (RD=0.51; 95% CI: 0.38 to 0.63; p<0.00001), both showed a reduction with MEP 300 mg/IV and 750 mg/IV. No statistically significant differences in treatment-related adverse effects outcomes were observed for either dosage (RD=0.09; 95% CI: -0.05 to 0.24; p=0.20; RD=0.09; 95% CI: -0.11 to 0.29; p=0.39). Despite the positive effects observed for the studied outcomes, the exact significance remains unclear. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8478134 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Faculdade de Medicina / USP |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-84781342021-10-01 Mepolizumab in Hypereosinophilic Syndrome: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis Alves, José Mario Prota, Francisco Eduardo Villagelin, Danilo Bley, Fernanda Bernardo, Wanderley Marques Clinics (Sao Paulo) Review Article We aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of mepolizumab (MEP) in the management of hypereosinophilic syndrome (HES). A systematic search was performed, and articles published until March 2021 were analyzed. The primary efficacy results evaluated were hospitalization rate related to HES, morbidity (new or worsening), relapses/failure, treatment-related adverse effects, prednisone dosage ≤10 mg/day for ≥8 weeks, and eosinophil count <600/μL for ≥8 weeks. A meta-analysis was conducted, when appropriate. Three randomized controlled trials (RCTs), with a total of 255 patients, were included. The studies contemplated the use of MEP 300 mg/SC or 750 mg/IV. According to the evaluation of the proposed outcomes, when relapse rates/therapeutic failures were assessed, there was a 26% reduction with MEP 300 mg/SC (RD=-0.26; 95% CI: -0.44 to -0.08; p=0.04) and 48% reduction with MEP 750 mg/IV (RD=-0.48; 95% CI: -0.67, -0.30; p<0.00001). For the outcomes, prednisone dosage ≤10 mg/day for ≥8 weeks was 48% (RD=0.48; 95% CI: 0.35 to 0.62; p<0.00001), and the eosinophil count <600/μL for ≥8 weeks was 51% (RD=0.51; 95% CI: 0.38 to 0.63; p<0.00001), both showed a reduction with MEP 300 mg/IV and 750 mg/IV. No statistically significant differences in treatment-related adverse effects outcomes were observed for either dosage (RD=0.09; 95% CI: -0.05 to 0.24; p=0.20; RD=0.09; 95% CI: -0.11 to 0.29; p=0.39). Despite the positive effects observed for the studied outcomes, the exact significance remains unclear. Faculdade de Medicina / USP 2021-09-28 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC8478134/ /pubmed/34644737 http://dx.doi.org/10.6061/clinics/2021/e3271 Text en Copyright © 2021 CLINICS https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) ) which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Review Article Alves, José Mario Prota, Francisco Eduardo Villagelin, Danilo Bley, Fernanda Bernardo, Wanderley Marques Mepolizumab in Hypereosinophilic Syndrome: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis |
title | Mepolizumab in Hypereosinophilic Syndrome: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis |
title_full | Mepolizumab in Hypereosinophilic Syndrome: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis |
title_fullStr | Mepolizumab in Hypereosinophilic Syndrome: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Mepolizumab in Hypereosinophilic Syndrome: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis |
title_short | Mepolizumab in Hypereosinophilic Syndrome: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis |
title_sort | mepolizumab in hypereosinophilic syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
topic | Review Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8478134/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34644737 http://dx.doi.org/10.6061/clinics/2021/e3271 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT alvesjosemario mepolizumabinhypereosinophilicsyndromeasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT protafranciscoeduardo mepolizumabinhypereosinophilicsyndromeasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT villagelindanilo mepolizumabinhypereosinophilicsyndromeasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT bleyfernanda mepolizumabinhypereosinophilicsyndromeasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT bernardowanderleymarques mepolizumabinhypereosinophilicsyndromeasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis |