Cargando…

Characterising long COVID: a living systematic review

BACKGROUND: While it is now apparent clinical sequelae (long COVID) may persist after acute COVID-19, their nature, frequency and aetiology are poorly characterised. This study aims to regularly synthesise evidence on long COVID characteristics, to help inform clinical management, rehabilitation str...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Michelen, Melina, Manoharan, Lakshmi, Elkheir, Natalie, Cheng, Vincent, Dagens, Andrew, Hastie, Claire, O'Hara, Margaret, Suett, Jake, Dahmash, Dania, Bugaeva, Polina, Rigby, Ishmeala, Munblit, Daniel, Harriss, Eli, Burls, Amanda, Foote, Carole, Scott, Janet, Carson, Gail, Olliaro, Piero, Sigfrid, Louise, Stavropoulou, Charitini
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8478580/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34580069
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjgh-2021-005427
_version_ 1784576088637177856
author Michelen, Melina
Manoharan, Lakshmi
Elkheir, Natalie
Cheng, Vincent
Dagens, Andrew
Hastie, Claire
O'Hara, Margaret
Suett, Jake
Dahmash, Dania
Bugaeva, Polina
Rigby, Ishmeala
Munblit, Daniel
Harriss, Eli
Burls, Amanda
Foote, Carole
Scott, Janet
Carson, Gail
Olliaro, Piero
Sigfrid, Louise
Stavropoulou, Charitini
author_facet Michelen, Melina
Manoharan, Lakshmi
Elkheir, Natalie
Cheng, Vincent
Dagens, Andrew
Hastie, Claire
O'Hara, Margaret
Suett, Jake
Dahmash, Dania
Bugaeva, Polina
Rigby, Ishmeala
Munblit, Daniel
Harriss, Eli
Burls, Amanda
Foote, Carole
Scott, Janet
Carson, Gail
Olliaro, Piero
Sigfrid, Louise
Stavropoulou, Charitini
author_sort Michelen, Melina
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: While it is now apparent clinical sequelae (long COVID) may persist after acute COVID-19, their nature, frequency and aetiology are poorly characterised. This study aims to regularly synthesise evidence on long COVID characteristics, to help inform clinical management, rehabilitation strategies and interventional studies to improve long-term outcomes. METHODS: A living systematic review. Medline, CINAHL (EBSCO), Global Health (Ovid), WHO Global Research on COVID-19 database, LitCovid and Google Scholar were searched till 17 March 2021. Studies including at least 100 people with confirmed or clinically suspected COVID-19 at 12 weeks or more post onset were included. Risk of bias was assessed using the tool produced by Hoy et al. Results were analysed using descriptive statistics and meta-analyses to estimate prevalence. RESULTS: A total of 39 studies were included: 32 cohort, 6 cross-sectional and 1 case–control. Most showed high or moderate risk of bias. None were set in low-income countries and few included children. Studies reported on 10 951 people (48% female) in 12 countries. Most included previously hospitalised people (78%, 8520/10 951). The longest mean follow-up time was 221.7 (SD: 10.9) days post COVID-19 onset. Over 60 physical and psychological signs and symptoms with wide prevalence were reported, most commonly weakness (41%; 95% CI 25% to 59%), general malaise (33%; 95% CI 15% to 57%), fatigue (31%; 95% CI 24% to 39%), concentration impairment (26%; 95% CI 21% to 32%) and breathlessness (25%; 95% CI 18% to 34%). 37% (95% CI 18% to 60%) of patients reported reduced quality of life; 26% (10/39) of studies presented evidence of reduced pulmonary function. CONCLUSION: Long COVID is a complex condition with prolonged heterogeneous symptoms. The nature of studies precludes a precise case definition or risk evaluation. There is an urgent need for prospective, robust, standardised, controlled studies into aetiology, risk factors and biomarkers to characterise long COVID in different at-risk populations and settings. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42020211131.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8478580
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-84785802021-09-29 Characterising long COVID: a living systematic review Michelen, Melina Manoharan, Lakshmi Elkheir, Natalie Cheng, Vincent Dagens, Andrew Hastie, Claire O'Hara, Margaret Suett, Jake Dahmash, Dania Bugaeva, Polina Rigby, Ishmeala Munblit, Daniel Harriss, Eli Burls, Amanda Foote, Carole Scott, Janet Carson, Gail Olliaro, Piero Sigfrid, Louise Stavropoulou, Charitini BMJ Glob Health Original Research BACKGROUND: While it is now apparent clinical sequelae (long COVID) may persist after acute COVID-19, their nature, frequency and aetiology are poorly characterised. This study aims to regularly synthesise evidence on long COVID characteristics, to help inform clinical management, rehabilitation strategies and interventional studies to improve long-term outcomes. METHODS: A living systematic review. Medline, CINAHL (EBSCO), Global Health (Ovid), WHO Global Research on COVID-19 database, LitCovid and Google Scholar were searched till 17 March 2021. Studies including at least 100 people with confirmed or clinically suspected COVID-19 at 12 weeks or more post onset were included. Risk of bias was assessed using the tool produced by Hoy et al. Results were analysed using descriptive statistics and meta-analyses to estimate prevalence. RESULTS: A total of 39 studies were included: 32 cohort, 6 cross-sectional and 1 case–control. Most showed high or moderate risk of bias. None were set in low-income countries and few included children. Studies reported on 10 951 people (48% female) in 12 countries. Most included previously hospitalised people (78%, 8520/10 951). The longest mean follow-up time was 221.7 (SD: 10.9) days post COVID-19 onset. Over 60 physical and psychological signs and symptoms with wide prevalence were reported, most commonly weakness (41%; 95% CI 25% to 59%), general malaise (33%; 95% CI 15% to 57%), fatigue (31%; 95% CI 24% to 39%), concentration impairment (26%; 95% CI 21% to 32%) and breathlessness (25%; 95% CI 18% to 34%). 37% (95% CI 18% to 60%) of patients reported reduced quality of life; 26% (10/39) of studies presented evidence of reduced pulmonary function. CONCLUSION: Long COVID is a complex condition with prolonged heterogeneous symptoms. The nature of studies precludes a precise case definition or risk evaluation. There is an urgent need for prospective, robust, standardised, controlled studies into aetiology, risk factors and biomarkers to characterise long COVID in different at-risk populations and settings. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42020211131. BMJ Publishing Group 2021-09-27 /pmc/articles/PMC8478580/ /pubmed/34580069 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjgh-2021-005427 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Unported (CC BY 4.0) license, which permits others to copy, redistribute, remix, transform and build upon this work for any purpose, provided the original work is properly cited, a link to the licence is given, and indication of whether changes were made. See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Original Research
Michelen, Melina
Manoharan, Lakshmi
Elkheir, Natalie
Cheng, Vincent
Dagens, Andrew
Hastie, Claire
O'Hara, Margaret
Suett, Jake
Dahmash, Dania
Bugaeva, Polina
Rigby, Ishmeala
Munblit, Daniel
Harriss, Eli
Burls, Amanda
Foote, Carole
Scott, Janet
Carson, Gail
Olliaro, Piero
Sigfrid, Louise
Stavropoulou, Charitini
Characterising long COVID: a living systematic review
title Characterising long COVID: a living systematic review
title_full Characterising long COVID: a living systematic review
title_fullStr Characterising long COVID: a living systematic review
title_full_unstemmed Characterising long COVID: a living systematic review
title_short Characterising long COVID: a living systematic review
title_sort characterising long covid: a living systematic review
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8478580/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34580069
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjgh-2021-005427
work_keys_str_mv AT michelenmelina characterisinglongcovidalivingsystematicreview
AT manoharanlakshmi characterisinglongcovidalivingsystematicreview
AT elkheirnatalie characterisinglongcovidalivingsystematicreview
AT chengvincent characterisinglongcovidalivingsystematicreview
AT dagensandrew characterisinglongcovidalivingsystematicreview
AT hastieclaire characterisinglongcovidalivingsystematicreview
AT oharamargaret characterisinglongcovidalivingsystematicreview
AT suettjake characterisinglongcovidalivingsystematicreview
AT dahmashdania characterisinglongcovidalivingsystematicreview
AT bugaevapolina characterisinglongcovidalivingsystematicreview
AT rigbyishmeala characterisinglongcovidalivingsystematicreview
AT munblitdaniel characterisinglongcovidalivingsystematicreview
AT harrisseli characterisinglongcovidalivingsystematicreview
AT burlsamanda characterisinglongcovidalivingsystematicreview
AT footecarole characterisinglongcovidalivingsystematicreview
AT scottjanet characterisinglongcovidalivingsystematicreview
AT carsongail characterisinglongcovidalivingsystematicreview
AT olliaropiero characterisinglongcovidalivingsystematicreview
AT sigfridlouise characterisinglongcovidalivingsystematicreview
AT stavropouloucharitini characterisinglongcovidalivingsystematicreview