Cargando…

Efficacy of Aclidinium Bromide According to Baseline Therapy: Post-Hoc Analysis of ASCENT-COPD Randomized Trial

INTRODUCTION: Long-acting muscarinic antagonists (LAMAs), long-acting β(2)-agonists (LABAs), inhaled corticosteroids (ICS), and their combinations, are recommended for the treatment of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). This study aimed to determine whether the safety and efficacy of acli...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wise, Robert A., Scirica, Benjamin M., Bhatt, Deepak L., Daoud, Sami Z., Chuecos, Ferran, Garcia Gil, Esther, Chapman, Kenneth R.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Healthcare 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8478777/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34528220
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12325-021-01878-5
_version_ 1784576131828023296
author Wise, Robert A.
Scirica, Benjamin M.
Bhatt, Deepak L.
Daoud, Sami Z.
Chuecos, Ferran
Garcia Gil, Esther
Chapman, Kenneth R.
author_facet Wise, Robert A.
Scirica, Benjamin M.
Bhatt, Deepak L.
Daoud, Sami Z.
Chuecos, Ferran
Garcia Gil, Esther
Chapman, Kenneth R.
author_sort Wise, Robert A.
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Long-acting muscarinic antagonists (LAMAs), long-acting β(2)-agonists (LABAs), inhaled corticosteroids (ICS), and their combinations, are recommended for the treatment of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). This study aimed to determine whether the safety and efficacy of aclidinium bromide differs by baseline maintenance LABA and ICS therapies. METHODS: ASCENT-COPD was a phase 4, multicenter, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, parallel-group study of patients with moderate-to-very severe COPD and increased cardiovascular risk. Patients were randomized 1:1 to receive aclidinium 400 μg or placebo twice daily, via a multidose dry-powder inhaler for up to 3 years. Outcomes included time to first major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), all-cause mortality, change from baseline in trough forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV(1)), and COPD assessment test (CAT) total score over 3 years, and annual moderate-to-severe COPD exacerbation rate in patients receiving aclidinium or placebo with maintenance LABA monotherapy, ICS monotherapy, LABA + ICS (fixed/free), or no maintenance therapy (neither LABA nor ICS) at baseline. RESULTS: A total of 3589 patients were included (LABA, n = 227; ICS, n = 290; LABA + ICS, n = 2058; no maintenance, n = 1130). Aclidinium did not increase the risk of MACE or all-cause mortality versus placebo, regardless of baseline maintenance treatment. Reductions in moderate-to-severe exacerbation rates were observed with aclidinium versus placebo in all subgroups [LABA 43% (P = 0.046); ICS 25% (P = 0.202); LABA + ICS 22% (P = 0.003); no maintenance 18% (P = 0.130)]. Aclidinium improved morning trough FEV(1) irrespective of baseline therapy and CAT total scores, except for LABA and ICS subgroups, versus placebo at several time points. CONCLUSION: In patients with moderate-to-severe COPD and CV risk factors, the addition of aclidinium to maintenance therapy with LABA or LABA + ICS provided further benefit. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT01966107. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s12325-021-01878-5.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8478777
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Springer Healthcare
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-84787772021-10-08 Efficacy of Aclidinium Bromide According to Baseline Therapy: Post-Hoc Analysis of ASCENT-COPD Randomized Trial Wise, Robert A. Scirica, Benjamin M. Bhatt, Deepak L. Daoud, Sami Z. Chuecos, Ferran Garcia Gil, Esther Chapman, Kenneth R. Adv Ther Original Research INTRODUCTION: Long-acting muscarinic antagonists (LAMAs), long-acting β(2)-agonists (LABAs), inhaled corticosteroids (ICS), and their combinations, are recommended for the treatment of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). This study aimed to determine whether the safety and efficacy of aclidinium bromide differs by baseline maintenance LABA and ICS therapies. METHODS: ASCENT-COPD was a phase 4, multicenter, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, parallel-group study of patients with moderate-to-very severe COPD and increased cardiovascular risk. Patients were randomized 1:1 to receive aclidinium 400 μg or placebo twice daily, via a multidose dry-powder inhaler for up to 3 years. Outcomes included time to first major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), all-cause mortality, change from baseline in trough forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV(1)), and COPD assessment test (CAT) total score over 3 years, and annual moderate-to-severe COPD exacerbation rate in patients receiving aclidinium or placebo with maintenance LABA monotherapy, ICS monotherapy, LABA + ICS (fixed/free), or no maintenance therapy (neither LABA nor ICS) at baseline. RESULTS: A total of 3589 patients were included (LABA, n = 227; ICS, n = 290; LABA + ICS, n = 2058; no maintenance, n = 1130). Aclidinium did not increase the risk of MACE or all-cause mortality versus placebo, regardless of baseline maintenance treatment. Reductions in moderate-to-severe exacerbation rates were observed with aclidinium versus placebo in all subgroups [LABA 43% (P = 0.046); ICS 25% (P = 0.202); LABA + ICS 22% (P = 0.003); no maintenance 18% (P = 0.130)]. Aclidinium improved morning trough FEV(1) irrespective of baseline therapy and CAT total scores, except for LABA and ICS subgroups, versus placebo at several time points. CONCLUSION: In patients with moderate-to-severe COPD and CV risk factors, the addition of aclidinium to maintenance therapy with LABA or LABA + ICS provided further benefit. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT01966107. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s12325-021-01878-5. Springer Healthcare 2021-09-15 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC8478777/ /pubmed/34528220 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12325-021-01878-5 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Original Research
Wise, Robert A.
Scirica, Benjamin M.
Bhatt, Deepak L.
Daoud, Sami Z.
Chuecos, Ferran
Garcia Gil, Esther
Chapman, Kenneth R.
Efficacy of Aclidinium Bromide According to Baseline Therapy: Post-Hoc Analysis of ASCENT-COPD Randomized Trial
title Efficacy of Aclidinium Bromide According to Baseline Therapy: Post-Hoc Analysis of ASCENT-COPD Randomized Trial
title_full Efficacy of Aclidinium Bromide According to Baseline Therapy: Post-Hoc Analysis of ASCENT-COPD Randomized Trial
title_fullStr Efficacy of Aclidinium Bromide According to Baseline Therapy: Post-Hoc Analysis of ASCENT-COPD Randomized Trial
title_full_unstemmed Efficacy of Aclidinium Bromide According to Baseline Therapy: Post-Hoc Analysis of ASCENT-COPD Randomized Trial
title_short Efficacy of Aclidinium Bromide According to Baseline Therapy: Post-Hoc Analysis of ASCENT-COPD Randomized Trial
title_sort efficacy of aclidinium bromide according to baseline therapy: post-hoc analysis of ascent-copd randomized trial
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8478777/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34528220
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12325-021-01878-5
work_keys_str_mv AT wiseroberta efficacyofaclidiniumbromideaccordingtobaselinetherapyposthocanalysisofascentcopdrandomizedtrial
AT sciricabenjaminm efficacyofaclidiniumbromideaccordingtobaselinetherapyposthocanalysisofascentcopdrandomizedtrial
AT bhattdeepakl efficacyofaclidiniumbromideaccordingtobaselinetherapyposthocanalysisofascentcopdrandomizedtrial
AT daoudsamiz efficacyofaclidiniumbromideaccordingtobaselinetherapyposthocanalysisofascentcopdrandomizedtrial
AT chuecosferran efficacyofaclidiniumbromideaccordingtobaselinetherapyposthocanalysisofascentcopdrandomizedtrial
AT garciagilesther efficacyofaclidiniumbromideaccordingtobaselinetherapyposthocanalysisofascentcopdrandomizedtrial
AT chapmankennethr efficacyofaclidiniumbromideaccordingtobaselinetherapyposthocanalysisofascentcopdrandomizedtrial