Cargando…

The Negative Impacts of Acromegaly on Bone Microstructure Not Fully Reversible

PURPOSE: This study aimed to evaluate the bone turnover markers and bone microarchitecture parameters derived from high-resolution peripheral quantitative computed tomography (HR-pQCT) in active and controlled acromegaly patients. METHODS: This cross-sectional study involved 55 acromegaly patients f...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Duan, Lian, Yang, Shengmin, Wang, Lin Jie, Zhang, Yuelun, Li, Ran, Yang, Hongbo, Zhao, Yuxing, Du, Hanze, Zhai, Xiao, Gong, Fengying, Pan, Hui, Zhu, Huijuan, Xia, Weibo
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8479105/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34603213
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fendo.2021.738895
_version_ 1784576175839903744
author Duan, Lian
Yang, Shengmin
Wang, Lin Jie
Zhang, Yuelun
Li, Ran
Yang, Hongbo
Zhao, Yuxing
Du, Hanze
Zhai, Xiao
Gong, Fengying
Pan, Hui
Zhu, Huijuan
Xia, Weibo
author_facet Duan, Lian
Yang, Shengmin
Wang, Lin Jie
Zhang, Yuelun
Li, Ran
Yang, Hongbo
Zhao, Yuxing
Du, Hanze
Zhai, Xiao
Gong, Fengying
Pan, Hui
Zhu, Huijuan
Xia, Weibo
author_sort Duan, Lian
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: This study aimed to evaluate the bone turnover markers and bone microarchitecture parameters derived from high-resolution peripheral quantitative computed tomography (HR-pQCT) in active and controlled acromegaly patients. METHODS: This cross-sectional study involved 55 acromegaly patients from a tertiary hospital (23 males and 32 females, aged 45.0 ± 11.6 years). Firstly, growth hormone (GH), insulin-like growth factor-1 (IGF-1), and markers for bone turnover were assessed. Next, we derived peripheral bone microstructure parameters and volumetric bone mineral density (vBMD) through HR-pQCT. These parameters were compared between acromegaly patients and 110 healthy controls, as well as between 27 active and 28 controlled acromegaly patients. Moreover, the relationship between GH/IGF-1 and bone microstructure parameters was analyzed through multiple linear regression. RESULTS: As compared with healthy controls, acromegaly patients exhibited elevated cortical vBMD, reduced trabecular vBMD, and increased trabecular inhomogeneity in the distal radius and tibia. While controlled acromegaly patients had slower bone turnover, they did not necessarily have better bone microstructure relative to active patients in intergroup comparison. Nevertheless, multiple regression indicated that higher IGF-1 was associated with lower tibial stiffness and failure load. Additionally, males with higher IGF-1 typically had larger trabecular separation, lower trabecular number, and larger cortical pores in the radius. Moreover, patients with elevated GH typically had more porous cortical bone in the radius and fewer trabeculae in the tibia. However, the compromised bone strength in active patients was partially compensated by increased bone thickness. Furthermore, no significant linkage was observed between elevated GH/IGF-1 and the most important HR-pQCT parameters such as trabecular volumetric bone density. CONCLUSION: Acromegaly adversely affected bone quality, even in controlled patients. As the deterioration in bone microstructure due to prolonged GH/IGF-1 exposure was not fully reversible, clinicians should be aware of the bone fragility of acromegaly patients even after they had achieved biochemical remission.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8479105
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-84791052021-09-30 The Negative Impacts of Acromegaly on Bone Microstructure Not Fully Reversible Duan, Lian Yang, Shengmin Wang, Lin Jie Zhang, Yuelun Li, Ran Yang, Hongbo Zhao, Yuxing Du, Hanze Zhai, Xiao Gong, Fengying Pan, Hui Zhu, Huijuan Xia, Weibo Front Endocrinol (Lausanne) Endocrinology PURPOSE: This study aimed to evaluate the bone turnover markers and bone microarchitecture parameters derived from high-resolution peripheral quantitative computed tomography (HR-pQCT) in active and controlled acromegaly patients. METHODS: This cross-sectional study involved 55 acromegaly patients from a tertiary hospital (23 males and 32 females, aged 45.0 ± 11.6 years). Firstly, growth hormone (GH), insulin-like growth factor-1 (IGF-1), and markers for bone turnover were assessed. Next, we derived peripheral bone microstructure parameters and volumetric bone mineral density (vBMD) through HR-pQCT. These parameters were compared between acromegaly patients and 110 healthy controls, as well as between 27 active and 28 controlled acromegaly patients. Moreover, the relationship between GH/IGF-1 and bone microstructure parameters was analyzed through multiple linear regression. RESULTS: As compared with healthy controls, acromegaly patients exhibited elevated cortical vBMD, reduced trabecular vBMD, and increased trabecular inhomogeneity in the distal radius and tibia. While controlled acromegaly patients had slower bone turnover, they did not necessarily have better bone microstructure relative to active patients in intergroup comparison. Nevertheless, multiple regression indicated that higher IGF-1 was associated with lower tibial stiffness and failure load. Additionally, males with higher IGF-1 typically had larger trabecular separation, lower trabecular number, and larger cortical pores in the radius. Moreover, patients with elevated GH typically had more porous cortical bone in the radius and fewer trabeculae in the tibia. However, the compromised bone strength in active patients was partially compensated by increased bone thickness. Furthermore, no significant linkage was observed between elevated GH/IGF-1 and the most important HR-pQCT parameters such as trabecular volumetric bone density. CONCLUSION: Acromegaly adversely affected bone quality, even in controlled patients. As the deterioration in bone microstructure due to prolonged GH/IGF-1 exposure was not fully reversible, clinicians should be aware of the bone fragility of acromegaly patients even after they had achieved biochemical remission. Frontiers Media S.A. 2021-09-15 /pmc/articles/PMC8479105/ /pubmed/34603213 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fendo.2021.738895 Text en Copyright © 2021 Duan, Yang, Wang, Zhang, Li, Yang, Zhao, Du, Zhai, Gong, Pan, Zhu and Xia https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Endocrinology
Duan, Lian
Yang, Shengmin
Wang, Lin Jie
Zhang, Yuelun
Li, Ran
Yang, Hongbo
Zhao, Yuxing
Du, Hanze
Zhai, Xiao
Gong, Fengying
Pan, Hui
Zhu, Huijuan
Xia, Weibo
The Negative Impacts of Acromegaly on Bone Microstructure Not Fully Reversible
title The Negative Impacts of Acromegaly on Bone Microstructure Not Fully Reversible
title_full The Negative Impacts of Acromegaly on Bone Microstructure Not Fully Reversible
title_fullStr The Negative Impacts of Acromegaly on Bone Microstructure Not Fully Reversible
title_full_unstemmed The Negative Impacts of Acromegaly on Bone Microstructure Not Fully Reversible
title_short The Negative Impacts of Acromegaly on Bone Microstructure Not Fully Reversible
title_sort negative impacts of acromegaly on bone microstructure not fully reversible
topic Endocrinology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8479105/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34603213
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fendo.2021.738895
work_keys_str_mv AT duanlian thenegativeimpactsofacromegalyonbonemicrostructurenotfullyreversible
AT yangshengmin thenegativeimpactsofacromegalyonbonemicrostructurenotfullyreversible
AT wanglinjie thenegativeimpactsofacromegalyonbonemicrostructurenotfullyreversible
AT zhangyuelun thenegativeimpactsofacromegalyonbonemicrostructurenotfullyreversible
AT liran thenegativeimpactsofacromegalyonbonemicrostructurenotfullyreversible
AT yanghongbo thenegativeimpactsofacromegalyonbonemicrostructurenotfullyreversible
AT zhaoyuxing thenegativeimpactsofacromegalyonbonemicrostructurenotfullyreversible
AT duhanze thenegativeimpactsofacromegalyonbonemicrostructurenotfullyreversible
AT zhaixiao thenegativeimpactsofacromegalyonbonemicrostructurenotfullyreversible
AT gongfengying thenegativeimpactsofacromegalyonbonemicrostructurenotfullyreversible
AT panhui thenegativeimpactsofacromegalyonbonemicrostructurenotfullyreversible
AT zhuhuijuan thenegativeimpactsofacromegalyonbonemicrostructurenotfullyreversible
AT xiaweibo thenegativeimpactsofacromegalyonbonemicrostructurenotfullyreversible
AT duanlian negativeimpactsofacromegalyonbonemicrostructurenotfullyreversible
AT yangshengmin negativeimpactsofacromegalyonbonemicrostructurenotfullyreversible
AT wanglinjie negativeimpactsofacromegalyonbonemicrostructurenotfullyreversible
AT zhangyuelun negativeimpactsofacromegalyonbonemicrostructurenotfullyreversible
AT liran negativeimpactsofacromegalyonbonemicrostructurenotfullyreversible
AT yanghongbo negativeimpactsofacromegalyonbonemicrostructurenotfullyreversible
AT zhaoyuxing negativeimpactsofacromegalyonbonemicrostructurenotfullyreversible
AT duhanze negativeimpactsofacromegalyonbonemicrostructurenotfullyreversible
AT zhaixiao negativeimpactsofacromegalyonbonemicrostructurenotfullyreversible
AT gongfengying negativeimpactsofacromegalyonbonemicrostructurenotfullyreversible
AT panhui negativeimpactsofacromegalyonbonemicrostructurenotfullyreversible
AT zhuhuijuan negativeimpactsofacromegalyonbonemicrostructurenotfullyreversible
AT xiaweibo negativeimpactsofacromegalyonbonemicrostructurenotfullyreversible