Cargando…

Teachers’ Perceptions of Handwriting Legibility Versus the German Systematic Screening for Motoric-Handwriting Difficulties (SEMS)

Handwriting problems impact school achievement. The purpose of this pilot study was to evaluate the agreement between teachers’ opinions and the German Systematische Erfassung motorischer Schreibstörungen’s (SEMS) handwriting test and to estimate the prevalence of handwriting problems. This was a pr...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Franken, Anita M., Harris, Susan R.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8479145/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34323150
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/15394492211033828
_version_ 1784576186600390656
author Franken, Anita M.
Harris, Susan R.
author_facet Franken, Anita M.
Harris, Susan R.
author_sort Franken, Anita M.
collection PubMed
description Handwriting problems impact school achievement. The purpose of this pilot study was to evaluate the agreement between teachers’ opinions and the German Systematische Erfassung motorischer Schreibstörungen’s (SEMS) handwriting test and to estimate the prevalence of handwriting problems. This was a prospective, correlational study. Teachers’ ratings of handwriting from German children (Grades 2 and 4) were compared to SEMS scores. The agreement was calculated with Gwet’s AC2; preliminary cutoffs and prevalence were assessed with receiver–operating characteristic curves. SEMS accurately identified Grade 2 children with handwriting problems (specificity = 98.21%, sensitivity = 100%) but fewer Grade 4 children with handwriting difficulties than did teachers (specificity 97.67%, sensitivity 28.57%). Grade 4 item agreement supports the SEMS’ ability to assess underlying handwriting dimensions as perceived by teachers. Teachers identified 12.70% of Grade 2 children versus SEMS 11.11% and 14% of Grade 4 children versus SEMS 6%. The SEMS supports clinical observations and provides information about underlying handwriting dimensions. Because handwriting is used primarily at school, the opinions of teachers are also critical.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8479145
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-84791452021-09-30 Teachers’ Perceptions of Handwriting Legibility Versus the German Systematic Screening for Motoric-Handwriting Difficulties (SEMS) Franken, Anita M. Harris, Susan R. OTJR (Thorofare N J) Articles Handwriting problems impact school achievement. The purpose of this pilot study was to evaluate the agreement between teachers’ opinions and the German Systematische Erfassung motorischer Schreibstörungen’s (SEMS) handwriting test and to estimate the prevalence of handwriting problems. This was a prospective, correlational study. Teachers’ ratings of handwriting from German children (Grades 2 and 4) were compared to SEMS scores. The agreement was calculated with Gwet’s AC2; preliminary cutoffs and prevalence were assessed with receiver–operating characteristic curves. SEMS accurately identified Grade 2 children with handwriting problems (specificity = 98.21%, sensitivity = 100%) but fewer Grade 4 children with handwriting difficulties than did teachers (specificity 97.67%, sensitivity 28.57%). Grade 4 item agreement supports the SEMS’ ability to assess underlying handwriting dimensions as perceived by teachers. Teachers identified 12.70% of Grade 2 children versus SEMS 11.11% and 14% of Grade 4 children versus SEMS 6%. The SEMS supports clinical observations and provides information about underlying handwriting dimensions. Because handwriting is used primarily at school, the opinions of teachers are also critical. SAGE Publications 2021-07-29 2021-10 /pmc/articles/PMC8479145/ /pubmed/34323150 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/15394492211033828 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access page (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle Articles
Franken, Anita M.
Harris, Susan R.
Teachers’ Perceptions of Handwriting Legibility Versus the German Systematic Screening for Motoric-Handwriting Difficulties (SEMS)
title Teachers’ Perceptions of Handwriting Legibility Versus the German Systematic Screening for Motoric-Handwriting Difficulties (SEMS)
title_full Teachers’ Perceptions of Handwriting Legibility Versus the German Systematic Screening for Motoric-Handwriting Difficulties (SEMS)
title_fullStr Teachers’ Perceptions of Handwriting Legibility Versus the German Systematic Screening for Motoric-Handwriting Difficulties (SEMS)
title_full_unstemmed Teachers’ Perceptions of Handwriting Legibility Versus the German Systematic Screening for Motoric-Handwriting Difficulties (SEMS)
title_short Teachers’ Perceptions of Handwriting Legibility Versus the German Systematic Screening for Motoric-Handwriting Difficulties (SEMS)
title_sort teachers’ perceptions of handwriting legibility versus the german systematic screening for motoric-handwriting difficulties (sems)
topic Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8479145/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34323150
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/15394492211033828
work_keys_str_mv AT frankenanitam teachersperceptionsofhandwritinglegibilityversusthegermansystematicscreeningformotorichandwritingdifficultiessems
AT harrissusanr teachersperceptionsofhandwritinglegibilityversusthegermansystematicscreeningformotorichandwritingdifficultiessems