Cargando…

Immediate or Interval Endoscopic Papillary Large-balloon Dilation after Limited Endoscopic Sphincterotomy for Bile Duct Stone Removal

OBJECTIVE: Endoscopic papillary large-balloon dilation (EPLBD) with limited endoscopic sphincterotomy (EST) is widely used for removing multiple large common bile duct (CBD) stones. However, the safety and effectiveness of immediate EPLBD after limited EST and EPLBD at an interval after limited EST...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Saito, Hirokazu, Imamura, Haruo, Matsushita, Ikuo, Kakuma, Tatsuyuki, Tada, Shuji
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Japanese Society of Internal Medicine 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8479206/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33716286
http://dx.doi.org/10.2169/internalmedicine.6708-20
Descripción
Sumario:OBJECTIVE: Endoscopic papillary large-balloon dilation (EPLBD) with limited endoscopic sphincterotomy (EST) is widely used for removing multiple large common bile duct (CBD) stones. However, the safety and effectiveness of immediate EPLBD after limited EST and EPLBD at an interval after limited EST is unclear. Thus, this multicenter retrospective study was conducted to examine this matter. METHODS: Propensity score-matching was performed to adjust the baseline characteristics between the immediate and interval EPLBD groups. We compared the incidence of post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) complications and the early outcomes of ERCP between the 2 matched groups, which comprised 66 patients each. RESULTS: The complete stone clearance rate in each study group was 100%. The overall incidence of post-ERCP complications in the propensity score-matched interval and immediate EPLBD groups was 3/33 (9.1%) and 1/33 (3.0%), respectively (p=0.61). The immediate EPLBD group had significantly fewer mean ERCP sessions for complete stone removal and a significantly lower rate of endoscopic mechanical lithotripsy (EML) usage than the interval EPLBD group [1.6 vs. 2.4 sessions, p<0.001; and 4/33 (12.1%) vs. 12/33 (36.4%), p=0.042, respectively]. CONCLUSION: The incidence of post-ERCP complications in the immediate EPLBD group was not significantly different from that in the interval EPLBD group. Compared with interval EPLBD, immediate EPLBD may result in a reduced number of ERCP sessions for complete stone clearance and reduce the rate of EML usage.