Cargando…
A Second-Generation (44-Channel) Suprachoroidal Retinal Prosthesis: Interim Clinical Trial Results
PURPOSE: To report the initial safety and efficacy results of a second-generation (44-channel) suprachoroidal retinal prosthesis at 56 weeks after device activation. METHODS: Four subjects, with advanced retinitis pigmentosa and bare-light perception only, enrolled in a phase II trial (NCT03406416)....
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
The Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8479573/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34581770 http://dx.doi.org/10.1167/tvst.10.10.12 |
_version_ | 1784576288050118656 |
---|---|
author | Petoe, Matthew A. Titchener, Samuel A. Kolic, Maria Kentler, William G. Abbott, Carla J. Nayagam, David A. X. Baglin, Elizabeth K. Kvansakul, Jessica Barnes, Nick Walker, Janine G. Epp, Stephanie B. Young, Kiera A. Ayton, Lauren N. Luu, Chi D. Allen, Penelope J. |
author_facet | Petoe, Matthew A. Titchener, Samuel A. Kolic, Maria Kentler, William G. Abbott, Carla J. Nayagam, David A. X. Baglin, Elizabeth K. Kvansakul, Jessica Barnes, Nick Walker, Janine G. Epp, Stephanie B. Young, Kiera A. Ayton, Lauren N. Luu, Chi D. Allen, Penelope J. |
author_sort | Petoe, Matthew A. |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: To report the initial safety and efficacy results of a second-generation (44-channel) suprachoroidal retinal prosthesis at 56 weeks after device activation. METHODS: Four subjects, with advanced retinitis pigmentosa and bare-light perception only, enrolled in a phase II trial (NCT03406416). A 44-channel electrode array was implanted in a suprachoroidal pocket. Device stability, efficacy, and adverse events were investigated at 12-week intervals. RESULTS: All four subjects were implanted successfully and there were no device-related serious adverse events. Color fundus photography indicated a mild postoperative subretinal hemorrhage in two recipients, which cleared spontaneously within 2 weeks. Optical coherence tomography confirmed device stability and position under the macula. Screen-based localization accuracy was significantly better for all subjects with device on versus device off. Two subjects were significantly better with the device on in a motion discrimination task at 7, 15, and 30°/s and in a spatial discrimination task at 0.033 cycles per degree. All subjects were more accurate with the device on than device off at walking toward a target on a modified door task, localizing and touching tabletop objects, and detecting obstacles in an obstacle avoidance task. A positive effect of the implant on subjects’ daily lives was confirmed by an orientation and mobility assessor and subject self-report. CONCLUSIONS: These interim study data demonstrate that the suprachoroidal prosthesis is safe and provides significant improvements in functional vision, activities of daily living, and observer-rated quality of life. TRANSLATIONAL RELEVANCE: A suprachoroidal prosthesis can provide clinically useful artificial vision while maintaining a safe surgical profile. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8479573 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | The Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-84795732021-10-08 A Second-Generation (44-Channel) Suprachoroidal Retinal Prosthesis: Interim Clinical Trial Results Petoe, Matthew A. Titchener, Samuel A. Kolic, Maria Kentler, William G. Abbott, Carla J. Nayagam, David A. X. Baglin, Elizabeth K. Kvansakul, Jessica Barnes, Nick Walker, Janine G. Epp, Stephanie B. Young, Kiera A. Ayton, Lauren N. Luu, Chi D. Allen, Penelope J. Transl Vis Sci Technol Special Issue PURPOSE: To report the initial safety and efficacy results of a second-generation (44-channel) suprachoroidal retinal prosthesis at 56 weeks after device activation. METHODS: Four subjects, with advanced retinitis pigmentosa and bare-light perception only, enrolled in a phase II trial (NCT03406416). A 44-channel electrode array was implanted in a suprachoroidal pocket. Device stability, efficacy, and adverse events were investigated at 12-week intervals. RESULTS: All four subjects were implanted successfully and there were no device-related serious adverse events. Color fundus photography indicated a mild postoperative subretinal hemorrhage in two recipients, which cleared spontaneously within 2 weeks. Optical coherence tomography confirmed device stability and position under the macula. Screen-based localization accuracy was significantly better for all subjects with device on versus device off. Two subjects were significantly better with the device on in a motion discrimination task at 7, 15, and 30°/s and in a spatial discrimination task at 0.033 cycles per degree. All subjects were more accurate with the device on than device off at walking toward a target on a modified door task, localizing and touching tabletop objects, and detecting obstacles in an obstacle avoidance task. A positive effect of the implant on subjects’ daily lives was confirmed by an orientation and mobility assessor and subject self-report. CONCLUSIONS: These interim study data demonstrate that the suprachoroidal prosthesis is safe and provides significant improvements in functional vision, activities of daily living, and observer-rated quality of life. TRANSLATIONAL RELEVANCE: A suprachoroidal prosthesis can provide clinically useful artificial vision while maintaining a safe surgical profile. The Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology 2021-09-28 /pmc/articles/PMC8479573/ /pubmed/34581770 http://dx.doi.org/10.1167/tvst.10.10.12 Text en Copyright 2021 The Authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License. |
spellingShingle | Special Issue Petoe, Matthew A. Titchener, Samuel A. Kolic, Maria Kentler, William G. Abbott, Carla J. Nayagam, David A. X. Baglin, Elizabeth K. Kvansakul, Jessica Barnes, Nick Walker, Janine G. Epp, Stephanie B. Young, Kiera A. Ayton, Lauren N. Luu, Chi D. Allen, Penelope J. A Second-Generation (44-Channel) Suprachoroidal Retinal Prosthesis: Interim Clinical Trial Results |
title | A Second-Generation (44-Channel) Suprachoroidal Retinal Prosthesis: Interim Clinical Trial Results |
title_full | A Second-Generation (44-Channel) Suprachoroidal Retinal Prosthesis: Interim Clinical Trial Results |
title_fullStr | A Second-Generation (44-Channel) Suprachoroidal Retinal Prosthesis: Interim Clinical Trial Results |
title_full_unstemmed | A Second-Generation (44-Channel) Suprachoroidal Retinal Prosthesis: Interim Clinical Trial Results |
title_short | A Second-Generation (44-Channel) Suprachoroidal Retinal Prosthesis: Interim Clinical Trial Results |
title_sort | second-generation (44-channel) suprachoroidal retinal prosthesis: interim clinical trial results |
topic | Special Issue |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8479573/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34581770 http://dx.doi.org/10.1167/tvst.10.10.12 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT petoematthewa asecondgeneration44channelsuprachoroidalretinalprosthesisinterimclinicaltrialresults AT titchenersamuela asecondgeneration44channelsuprachoroidalretinalprosthesisinterimclinicaltrialresults AT kolicmaria asecondgeneration44channelsuprachoroidalretinalprosthesisinterimclinicaltrialresults AT kentlerwilliamg asecondgeneration44channelsuprachoroidalretinalprosthesisinterimclinicaltrialresults AT abbottcarlaj asecondgeneration44channelsuprachoroidalretinalprosthesisinterimclinicaltrialresults AT nayagamdavidax asecondgeneration44channelsuprachoroidalretinalprosthesisinterimclinicaltrialresults AT baglinelizabethk asecondgeneration44channelsuprachoroidalretinalprosthesisinterimclinicaltrialresults AT kvansakuljessica asecondgeneration44channelsuprachoroidalretinalprosthesisinterimclinicaltrialresults AT barnesnick asecondgeneration44channelsuprachoroidalretinalprosthesisinterimclinicaltrialresults AT walkerjanineg asecondgeneration44channelsuprachoroidalretinalprosthesisinterimclinicaltrialresults AT eppstephanieb asecondgeneration44channelsuprachoroidalretinalprosthesisinterimclinicaltrialresults AT youngkieraa asecondgeneration44channelsuprachoroidalretinalprosthesisinterimclinicaltrialresults AT aytonlaurenn asecondgeneration44channelsuprachoroidalretinalprosthesisinterimclinicaltrialresults AT luuchid asecondgeneration44channelsuprachoroidalretinalprosthesisinterimclinicaltrialresults AT allenpenelopej asecondgeneration44channelsuprachoroidalretinalprosthesisinterimclinicaltrialresults AT asecondgeneration44channelsuprachoroidalretinalprosthesisinterimclinicaltrialresults AT petoematthewa secondgeneration44channelsuprachoroidalretinalprosthesisinterimclinicaltrialresults AT titchenersamuela secondgeneration44channelsuprachoroidalretinalprosthesisinterimclinicaltrialresults AT kolicmaria secondgeneration44channelsuprachoroidalretinalprosthesisinterimclinicaltrialresults AT kentlerwilliamg secondgeneration44channelsuprachoroidalretinalprosthesisinterimclinicaltrialresults AT abbottcarlaj secondgeneration44channelsuprachoroidalretinalprosthesisinterimclinicaltrialresults AT nayagamdavidax secondgeneration44channelsuprachoroidalretinalprosthesisinterimclinicaltrialresults AT baglinelizabethk secondgeneration44channelsuprachoroidalretinalprosthesisinterimclinicaltrialresults AT kvansakuljessica secondgeneration44channelsuprachoroidalretinalprosthesisinterimclinicaltrialresults AT barnesnick secondgeneration44channelsuprachoroidalretinalprosthesisinterimclinicaltrialresults AT walkerjanineg secondgeneration44channelsuprachoroidalretinalprosthesisinterimclinicaltrialresults AT eppstephanieb secondgeneration44channelsuprachoroidalretinalprosthesisinterimclinicaltrialresults AT youngkieraa secondgeneration44channelsuprachoroidalretinalprosthesisinterimclinicaltrialresults AT aytonlaurenn secondgeneration44channelsuprachoroidalretinalprosthesisinterimclinicaltrialresults AT luuchid secondgeneration44channelsuprachoroidalretinalprosthesisinterimclinicaltrialresults AT allenpenelopej secondgeneration44channelsuprachoroidalretinalprosthesisinterimclinicaltrialresults AT secondgeneration44channelsuprachoroidalretinalprosthesisinterimclinicaltrialresults |