Cargando…

The look and feel of soft are similar across different softness dimensions

The softness of objects can be perceived through several senses. For instance, to judge the softness of a cat's fur, we do not only look at it, we often also run our fingers through its coat. Recently, we have shown that haptically perceived softness covaries with the compliance, viscosity, gra...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Cavdan, Müge, Drewing, Knut, Doerschner, Katja
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8479577/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34581768
http://dx.doi.org/10.1167/jov.21.10.20
_version_ 1784576289093451776
author Cavdan, Müge
Drewing, Knut
Doerschner, Katja
author_facet Cavdan, Müge
Drewing, Knut
Doerschner, Katja
author_sort Cavdan, Müge
collection PubMed
description The softness of objects can be perceived through several senses. For instance, to judge the softness of a cat's fur, we do not only look at it, we often also run our fingers through its coat. Recently, we have shown that haptically perceived softness covaries with the compliance, viscosity, granularity, and furriness of materials (Dovencioglu, Üstün, Doerschner, & Drewing, 2020). However, it is unknown whether vision can provide similar information about the various aspects of perceived softness. Here, we investigated this question in an experiment with three conditions: in the haptic condition, blindfolded participants explored materials with their hands, in the static visual condition participants were presented with close-up photographs of the same materials, and in the dynamic visual condition participants watched videos of the hand-material interactions that were recorded in the haptic condition. After haptically or visually exploring the materials, participants rated them on various attributes. Our results show a high overall perceptual correspondence among the three experimental conditions. With a few exceptions, this correspondence tended to be strongest between haptic and dynamic visual conditions. These results are discussed with respect to information potentially available through the senses, or through prior experience, when judging the softness of materials.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8479577
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher The Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-84795772021-10-08 The look and feel of soft are similar across different softness dimensions Cavdan, Müge Drewing, Knut Doerschner, Katja J Vis Article The softness of objects can be perceived through several senses. For instance, to judge the softness of a cat's fur, we do not only look at it, we often also run our fingers through its coat. Recently, we have shown that haptically perceived softness covaries with the compliance, viscosity, granularity, and furriness of materials (Dovencioglu, Üstün, Doerschner, & Drewing, 2020). However, it is unknown whether vision can provide similar information about the various aspects of perceived softness. Here, we investigated this question in an experiment with three conditions: in the haptic condition, blindfolded participants explored materials with their hands, in the static visual condition participants were presented with close-up photographs of the same materials, and in the dynamic visual condition participants watched videos of the hand-material interactions that were recorded in the haptic condition. After haptically or visually exploring the materials, participants rated them on various attributes. Our results show a high overall perceptual correspondence among the three experimental conditions. With a few exceptions, this correspondence tended to be strongest between haptic and dynamic visual conditions. These results are discussed with respect to information potentially available through the senses, or through prior experience, when judging the softness of materials. The Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology 2021-09-28 /pmc/articles/PMC8479577/ /pubmed/34581768 http://dx.doi.org/10.1167/jov.21.10.20 Text en Copyright 2021 The Authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
spellingShingle Article
Cavdan, Müge
Drewing, Knut
Doerschner, Katja
The look and feel of soft are similar across different softness dimensions
title The look and feel of soft are similar across different softness dimensions
title_full The look and feel of soft are similar across different softness dimensions
title_fullStr The look and feel of soft are similar across different softness dimensions
title_full_unstemmed The look and feel of soft are similar across different softness dimensions
title_short The look and feel of soft are similar across different softness dimensions
title_sort look and feel of soft are similar across different softness dimensions
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8479577/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34581768
http://dx.doi.org/10.1167/jov.21.10.20
work_keys_str_mv AT cavdanmuge thelookandfeelofsoftaresimilaracrossdifferentsoftnessdimensions
AT drewingknut thelookandfeelofsoftaresimilaracrossdifferentsoftnessdimensions
AT doerschnerkatja thelookandfeelofsoftaresimilaracrossdifferentsoftnessdimensions
AT cavdanmuge lookandfeelofsoftaresimilaracrossdifferentsoftnessdimensions
AT drewingknut lookandfeelofsoftaresimilaracrossdifferentsoftnessdimensions
AT doerschnerkatja lookandfeelofsoftaresimilaracrossdifferentsoftnessdimensions