Cargando…
The look and feel of soft are similar across different softness dimensions
The softness of objects can be perceived through several senses. For instance, to judge the softness of a cat's fur, we do not only look at it, we often also run our fingers through its coat. Recently, we have shown that haptically perceived softness covaries with the compliance, viscosity, gra...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
The Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8479577/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34581768 http://dx.doi.org/10.1167/jov.21.10.20 |
_version_ | 1784576289093451776 |
---|---|
author | Cavdan, Müge Drewing, Knut Doerschner, Katja |
author_facet | Cavdan, Müge Drewing, Knut Doerschner, Katja |
author_sort | Cavdan, Müge |
collection | PubMed |
description | The softness of objects can be perceived through several senses. For instance, to judge the softness of a cat's fur, we do not only look at it, we often also run our fingers through its coat. Recently, we have shown that haptically perceived softness covaries with the compliance, viscosity, granularity, and furriness of materials (Dovencioglu, Üstün, Doerschner, & Drewing, 2020). However, it is unknown whether vision can provide similar information about the various aspects of perceived softness. Here, we investigated this question in an experiment with three conditions: in the haptic condition, blindfolded participants explored materials with their hands, in the static visual condition participants were presented with close-up photographs of the same materials, and in the dynamic visual condition participants watched videos of the hand-material interactions that were recorded in the haptic condition. After haptically or visually exploring the materials, participants rated them on various attributes. Our results show a high overall perceptual correspondence among the three experimental conditions. With a few exceptions, this correspondence tended to be strongest between haptic and dynamic visual conditions. These results are discussed with respect to information potentially available through the senses, or through prior experience, when judging the softness of materials. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8479577 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | The Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-84795772021-10-08 The look and feel of soft are similar across different softness dimensions Cavdan, Müge Drewing, Knut Doerschner, Katja J Vis Article The softness of objects can be perceived through several senses. For instance, to judge the softness of a cat's fur, we do not only look at it, we often also run our fingers through its coat. Recently, we have shown that haptically perceived softness covaries with the compliance, viscosity, granularity, and furriness of materials (Dovencioglu, Üstün, Doerschner, & Drewing, 2020). However, it is unknown whether vision can provide similar information about the various aspects of perceived softness. Here, we investigated this question in an experiment with three conditions: in the haptic condition, blindfolded participants explored materials with their hands, in the static visual condition participants were presented with close-up photographs of the same materials, and in the dynamic visual condition participants watched videos of the hand-material interactions that were recorded in the haptic condition. After haptically or visually exploring the materials, participants rated them on various attributes. Our results show a high overall perceptual correspondence among the three experimental conditions. With a few exceptions, this correspondence tended to be strongest between haptic and dynamic visual conditions. These results are discussed with respect to information potentially available through the senses, or through prior experience, when judging the softness of materials. The Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology 2021-09-28 /pmc/articles/PMC8479577/ /pubmed/34581768 http://dx.doi.org/10.1167/jov.21.10.20 Text en Copyright 2021 The Authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License. |
spellingShingle | Article Cavdan, Müge Drewing, Knut Doerschner, Katja The look and feel of soft are similar across different softness dimensions |
title | The look and feel of soft are similar across different softness dimensions |
title_full | The look and feel of soft are similar across different softness dimensions |
title_fullStr | The look and feel of soft are similar across different softness dimensions |
title_full_unstemmed | The look and feel of soft are similar across different softness dimensions |
title_short | The look and feel of soft are similar across different softness dimensions |
title_sort | look and feel of soft are similar across different softness dimensions |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8479577/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34581768 http://dx.doi.org/10.1167/jov.21.10.20 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT cavdanmuge thelookandfeelofsoftaresimilaracrossdifferentsoftnessdimensions AT drewingknut thelookandfeelofsoftaresimilaracrossdifferentsoftnessdimensions AT doerschnerkatja thelookandfeelofsoftaresimilaracrossdifferentsoftnessdimensions AT cavdanmuge lookandfeelofsoftaresimilaracrossdifferentsoftnessdimensions AT drewingknut lookandfeelofsoftaresimilaracrossdifferentsoftnessdimensions AT doerschnerkatja lookandfeelofsoftaresimilaracrossdifferentsoftnessdimensions |