Cargando…
Intermediate term outcomes after transvaginal uterine-preserving surgery in women with uterovaginal prolapse
INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: There is growing interest in and performance of uterine-preserving prolapse repairs. We hypothesized that there would be no difference in pelvic organ prolapse (POP) recurrence 2 years following transvaginal uterosacral ligament hysteropexy (USLH) and sacrospinous ligame...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer International Publishing
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8479721/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34586437 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00192-021-04987-5 |
_version_ | 1784576319464407040 |
---|---|
author | Hickman, Lisa C. Tran, Misha C. Paraiso, Marie Fidela R. Walters, Mark D. Ferrando, Cecile A. |
author_facet | Hickman, Lisa C. Tran, Misha C. Paraiso, Marie Fidela R. Walters, Mark D. Ferrando, Cecile A. |
author_sort | Hickman, Lisa C. |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: There is growing interest in and performance of uterine-preserving prolapse repairs. We hypothesized that there would be no difference in pelvic organ prolapse (POP) recurrence 2 years following transvaginal uterosacral ligament hysteropexy (USLH) and sacrospinous ligament hysteropexy (SSLH). METHODS: This is a retrospective cohort study with a cross-sectional survey of women who underwent transvaginal uterine-preserving POP surgery from May 2016 to December 2017. Patients were included if they underwent either USLH or SSLH. POP recurrence was defined as a composite of subjective symptoms and/or retreatment. A cross-sectional survey was used to assess pelvic floor symptoms and patient satisfaction. RESULTS: A total of 47 women met the criteria. Mean age was 52.8 ± 12.5 years, and all had a preoperative POP-Q stage of 2 (55.3%) or 3 (44.7%). Thirty (63.8%) underwent SSLH and 17 (36.2%) underwent USLH. There were no differences in patient characteristics or perioperative data. There was no difference in composite recurrence (26.7% [8] vs 23.5% [4]) and retreatment (6.7% [2] vs 0%) retrospectively between SSLH and USLH groups at 22.6 months. Survey response rate was 80.9% (38) with a response time of 30.7 (28.0–36.6) months. The majority of patients (84.2%) reported POP symptom improvement, and both groups reported great satisfaction (89.5%). In respondents, 13.2% (5) reported subjective recurrence and 5.3% (2) underwent retreatment, with no differences between hysteropexy types. There were no differences in other pelvic floor symptoms. CONCLUSIONS: Although 1 in 4 women experienced subjective POP recurrence after transvaginal uterine-preserving prolapse repair and <5% underwent retreatment at 2 years, our results must be interpreted with caution given our small sample size. No differences in outcomes were identified between hysteropexy types; however, additional studies should be performed to confirm these findings. Both hysteropexy approaches were associated with great patient satisfaction. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00192-021-04987-5 |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8479721 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Springer International Publishing |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-84797212021-09-30 Intermediate term outcomes after transvaginal uterine-preserving surgery in women with uterovaginal prolapse Hickman, Lisa C. Tran, Misha C. Paraiso, Marie Fidela R. Walters, Mark D. Ferrando, Cecile A. Int Urogynecol J Original Article INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: There is growing interest in and performance of uterine-preserving prolapse repairs. We hypothesized that there would be no difference in pelvic organ prolapse (POP) recurrence 2 years following transvaginal uterosacral ligament hysteropexy (USLH) and sacrospinous ligament hysteropexy (SSLH). METHODS: This is a retrospective cohort study with a cross-sectional survey of women who underwent transvaginal uterine-preserving POP surgery from May 2016 to December 2017. Patients were included if they underwent either USLH or SSLH. POP recurrence was defined as a composite of subjective symptoms and/or retreatment. A cross-sectional survey was used to assess pelvic floor symptoms and patient satisfaction. RESULTS: A total of 47 women met the criteria. Mean age was 52.8 ± 12.5 years, and all had a preoperative POP-Q stage of 2 (55.3%) or 3 (44.7%). Thirty (63.8%) underwent SSLH and 17 (36.2%) underwent USLH. There were no differences in patient characteristics or perioperative data. There was no difference in composite recurrence (26.7% [8] vs 23.5% [4]) and retreatment (6.7% [2] vs 0%) retrospectively between SSLH and USLH groups at 22.6 months. Survey response rate was 80.9% (38) with a response time of 30.7 (28.0–36.6) months. The majority of patients (84.2%) reported POP symptom improvement, and both groups reported great satisfaction (89.5%). In respondents, 13.2% (5) reported subjective recurrence and 5.3% (2) underwent retreatment, with no differences between hysteropexy types. There were no differences in other pelvic floor symptoms. CONCLUSIONS: Although 1 in 4 women experienced subjective POP recurrence after transvaginal uterine-preserving prolapse repair and <5% underwent retreatment at 2 years, our results must be interpreted with caution given our small sample size. No differences in outcomes were identified between hysteropexy types; however, additional studies should be performed to confirm these findings. Both hysteropexy approaches were associated with great patient satisfaction. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00192-021-04987-5 Springer International Publishing 2021-09-29 2022 /pmc/articles/PMC8479721/ /pubmed/34586437 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00192-021-04987-5 Text en © The International Urogynecological Association 2021 This article is made available via the PMC Open Access Subset for unrestricted research re-use and secondary analysis in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for the duration of the World Health Organization (WHO) declaration of COVID-19 as a global pandemic. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Hickman, Lisa C. Tran, Misha C. Paraiso, Marie Fidela R. Walters, Mark D. Ferrando, Cecile A. Intermediate term outcomes after transvaginal uterine-preserving surgery in women with uterovaginal prolapse |
title | Intermediate term outcomes after transvaginal uterine-preserving surgery in women with uterovaginal prolapse |
title_full | Intermediate term outcomes after transvaginal uterine-preserving surgery in women with uterovaginal prolapse |
title_fullStr | Intermediate term outcomes after transvaginal uterine-preserving surgery in women with uterovaginal prolapse |
title_full_unstemmed | Intermediate term outcomes after transvaginal uterine-preserving surgery in women with uterovaginal prolapse |
title_short | Intermediate term outcomes after transvaginal uterine-preserving surgery in women with uterovaginal prolapse |
title_sort | intermediate term outcomes after transvaginal uterine-preserving surgery in women with uterovaginal prolapse |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8479721/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34586437 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00192-021-04987-5 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT hickmanlisac intermediatetermoutcomesaftertransvaginaluterinepreservingsurgeryinwomenwithuterovaginalprolapse AT tranmishac intermediatetermoutcomesaftertransvaginaluterinepreservingsurgeryinwomenwithuterovaginalprolapse AT paraisomariefidelar intermediatetermoutcomesaftertransvaginaluterinepreservingsurgeryinwomenwithuterovaginalprolapse AT waltersmarkd intermediatetermoutcomesaftertransvaginaluterinepreservingsurgeryinwomenwithuterovaginalprolapse AT ferrandocecilea intermediatetermoutcomesaftertransvaginaluterinepreservingsurgeryinwomenwithuterovaginalprolapse |