Cargando…

Modeling Protein–Glycosaminoglycan Complexes: Does the Size Matter?

[Image: see text] Docking glycosaminoglycans (GAGs) has been challenging because of the complex nature of these long periodic linear and negatively charged polysaccharides. Although standard docking tools like Autodock3 are successful when docking GAGs up to hexameric length, they experience challen...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Marcisz, Mateusz, Zacharias, Martin, Samsonov, Sergey A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: American Chemical Society 2021
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8479808/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34494837
http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acs.jcim.1c00664
_version_ 1784576338025250816
author Marcisz, Mateusz
Zacharias, Martin
Samsonov, Sergey A.
author_facet Marcisz, Mateusz
Zacharias, Martin
Samsonov, Sergey A.
author_sort Marcisz, Mateusz
collection PubMed
description [Image: see text] Docking glycosaminoglycans (GAGs) has been challenging because of the complex nature of these long periodic linear and negatively charged polysaccharides. Although standard docking tools like Autodock3 are successful when docking GAGs up to hexameric length, they experience challenges to properly dock longer GAGs. Similar limitations concern other docking approaches typically developed for docking ligands of limited size to proteins. At the same time, most of more advanced docking approaches are challenging for a user who is inexperienced with complex in silico methodologies. In this work, we evaluate the binding energies of complexes with different lengths of GAGs using all-atom molecular dynamics simulations. Based on this analysis, we propose a new docking protocol for long GAGs that consists of conventional docking of short GAGs and further elongation with the use of a coarse-grained representation of the GAG parts not being in direct contact with its protein receptor. This method automated by a simple script is straightforward to use within the Autodock3 framework but also useful in combination with other standard docking tools. We believe that this method with some minor case-specific modifications could also be used for docking other linear charged polymers.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8479808
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher American Chemical Society
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-84798082021-09-29 Modeling Protein–Glycosaminoglycan Complexes: Does the Size Matter? Marcisz, Mateusz Zacharias, Martin Samsonov, Sergey A. J Chem Inf Model [Image: see text] Docking glycosaminoglycans (GAGs) has been challenging because of the complex nature of these long periodic linear and negatively charged polysaccharides. Although standard docking tools like Autodock3 are successful when docking GAGs up to hexameric length, they experience challenges to properly dock longer GAGs. Similar limitations concern other docking approaches typically developed for docking ligands of limited size to proteins. At the same time, most of more advanced docking approaches are challenging for a user who is inexperienced with complex in silico methodologies. In this work, we evaluate the binding energies of complexes with different lengths of GAGs using all-atom molecular dynamics simulations. Based on this analysis, we propose a new docking protocol for long GAGs that consists of conventional docking of short GAGs and further elongation with the use of a coarse-grained representation of the GAG parts not being in direct contact with its protein receptor. This method automated by a simple script is straightforward to use within the Autodock3 framework but also useful in combination with other standard docking tools. We believe that this method with some minor case-specific modifications could also be used for docking other linear charged polymers. American Chemical Society 2021-09-08 2021-09-27 /pmc/articles/PMC8479808/ /pubmed/34494837 http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acs.jcim.1c00664 Text en © 2021 The Authors. Published by American Chemical Society https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Permits the broadest form of re-use including for commercial purposes, provided that author attribution and integrity are maintained (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Marcisz, Mateusz
Zacharias, Martin
Samsonov, Sergey A.
Modeling Protein–Glycosaminoglycan Complexes: Does the Size Matter?
title Modeling Protein–Glycosaminoglycan Complexes: Does the Size Matter?
title_full Modeling Protein–Glycosaminoglycan Complexes: Does the Size Matter?
title_fullStr Modeling Protein–Glycosaminoglycan Complexes: Does the Size Matter?
title_full_unstemmed Modeling Protein–Glycosaminoglycan Complexes: Does the Size Matter?
title_short Modeling Protein–Glycosaminoglycan Complexes: Does the Size Matter?
title_sort modeling protein–glycosaminoglycan complexes: does the size matter?
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8479808/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34494837
http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acs.jcim.1c00664
work_keys_str_mv AT marciszmateusz modelingproteinglycosaminoglycancomplexesdoesthesizematter
AT zachariasmartin modelingproteinglycosaminoglycancomplexesdoesthesizematter
AT samsonovsergeya modelingproteinglycosaminoglycancomplexesdoesthesizematter