Cargando…

Two-year results of a multi-centre, randomized controlled trial comparing a second-generation uncemented trabecular metal-backed versus cemented polyethylene glenoid component in total shoulder arthroplasty

AIMS: To report early (two-year) postoperative findings from a randomized controlled trial (RCT) investigating disease-specific quality of life (QOL), clinical, patient-reported, and radiological outcomes in patients undergoing a total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA) with a second-generation uncemented...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Chin, Patrick Y. K., Regan, William D., Plausinis, Derek, Zarzour, Zane D., Leung, Fay, Sasyniuk, Treny M., Lim, Brendan, Sayre, Eric C.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The British Editorial Society of Bone & Joint Surgery 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8479846/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34488426
http://dx.doi.org/10.1302/2633-1462.29.BJO-2021-0073.R1
_version_ 1784576345594920960
author Chin, Patrick Y. K.
Regan, William D.
Plausinis, Derek
Zarzour, Zane D.
Leung, Fay
Sasyniuk, Treny M.
Lim, Brendan
Sayre, Eric C.
author_facet Chin, Patrick Y. K.
Regan, William D.
Plausinis, Derek
Zarzour, Zane D.
Leung, Fay
Sasyniuk, Treny M.
Lim, Brendan
Sayre, Eric C.
author_sort Chin, Patrick Y. K.
collection PubMed
description AIMS: To report early (two-year) postoperative findings from a randomized controlled trial (RCT) investigating disease-specific quality of life (QOL), clinical, patient-reported, and radiological outcomes in patients undergoing a total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA) with a second-generation uncemented trabecular metal (TM) glenoid versus a cemented polyethylene glenoid (POLY) component. METHODS: Five fellowship-trained surgeons from three centres participated. Patients aged between 18 and 79 years with a primary diagnosis of glenohumeral osteoarthritis were screened for eligibility. Patients were randomized intraoperatively to either a TM or POLY glenoid component. Study intervals were: baseline, six weeks, six-, 12-, and 24 months postoperatively. The primary outcome was the Western Ontario Osteoarthritis Shoulder QOL score. Radiological images were reviewed for metal debris. Mixed effects repeated measures analysis of variance for within and between group comparisons were performed. RESULTS: A total of 93 patients were randomized (46 TM; 47 POLY). No significant or clinically important differences were found with patient-reported outcomes at 24-month follow-up. Regarding the glenoid components, there were no complications or revision surgeries in either group. Grade 1 metal debris was observed in three (6.5%) patients with TM glenoids at 24 months but outcomes were not negatively impacted. CONCLUSION: Early results from this RCT showed no differences in disease-specific QOL, radiographs, complication rates, or shoulder function between uncemented second-generation TM and cemented POLY glenoids at 24 months postoperatively. Revision surgeries and reoperations were reported in both groups, but none attributed to glenoid implant failure. At 24 months postoperatively, Grade 1 metal debris was found in 6.5% of patients with a TM glenoid but did not negatively influence patient-reported outcomes. Longer-term follow-up is needed and is underway. Cite this article: Bone Jt Open 2021;2(9):728–736.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8479846
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher The British Editorial Society of Bone & Joint Surgery
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-84798462021-10-14 Two-year results of a multi-centre, randomized controlled trial comparing a second-generation uncemented trabecular metal-backed versus cemented polyethylene glenoid component in total shoulder arthroplasty Chin, Patrick Y. K. Regan, William D. Plausinis, Derek Zarzour, Zane D. Leung, Fay Sasyniuk, Treny M. Lim, Brendan Sayre, Eric C. Bone Jt Open Shoulder & Elbow AIMS: To report early (two-year) postoperative findings from a randomized controlled trial (RCT) investigating disease-specific quality of life (QOL), clinical, patient-reported, and radiological outcomes in patients undergoing a total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA) with a second-generation uncemented trabecular metal (TM) glenoid versus a cemented polyethylene glenoid (POLY) component. METHODS: Five fellowship-trained surgeons from three centres participated. Patients aged between 18 and 79 years with a primary diagnosis of glenohumeral osteoarthritis were screened for eligibility. Patients were randomized intraoperatively to either a TM or POLY glenoid component. Study intervals were: baseline, six weeks, six-, 12-, and 24 months postoperatively. The primary outcome was the Western Ontario Osteoarthritis Shoulder QOL score. Radiological images were reviewed for metal debris. Mixed effects repeated measures analysis of variance for within and between group comparisons were performed. RESULTS: A total of 93 patients were randomized (46 TM; 47 POLY). No significant or clinically important differences were found with patient-reported outcomes at 24-month follow-up. Regarding the glenoid components, there were no complications or revision surgeries in either group. Grade 1 metal debris was observed in three (6.5%) patients with TM glenoids at 24 months but outcomes were not negatively impacted. CONCLUSION: Early results from this RCT showed no differences in disease-specific QOL, radiographs, complication rates, or shoulder function between uncemented second-generation TM and cemented POLY glenoids at 24 months postoperatively. Revision surgeries and reoperations were reported in both groups, but none attributed to glenoid implant failure. At 24 months postoperatively, Grade 1 metal debris was found in 6.5% of patients with a TM glenoid but did not negatively influence patient-reported outcomes. Longer-term follow-up is needed and is underway. Cite this article: Bone Jt Open 2021;2(9):728–736. The British Editorial Society of Bone & Joint Surgery 2021-09-07 /pmc/articles/PMC8479846/ /pubmed/34488426 http://dx.doi.org/10.1302/2633-1462.29.BJO-2021-0073.R1 Text en © 2021 Author(s) et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial No Derivatives (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0) licence, which permits the copying and redistribution of the work only, and provided the original author and source are credited. See https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
spellingShingle Shoulder & Elbow
Chin, Patrick Y. K.
Regan, William D.
Plausinis, Derek
Zarzour, Zane D.
Leung, Fay
Sasyniuk, Treny M.
Lim, Brendan
Sayre, Eric C.
Two-year results of a multi-centre, randomized controlled trial comparing a second-generation uncemented trabecular metal-backed versus cemented polyethylene glenoid component in total shoulder arthroplasty
title Two-year results of a multi-centre, randomized controlled trial comparing a second-generation uncemented trabecular metal-backed versus cemented polyethylene glenoid component in total shoulder arthroplasty
title_full Two-year results of a multi-centre, randomized controlled trial comparing a second-generation uncemented trabecular metal-backed versus cemented polyethylene glenoid component in total shoulder arthroplasty
title_fullStr Two-year results of a multi-centre, randomized controlled trial comparing a second-generation uncemented trabecular metal-backed versus cemented polyethylene glenoid component in total shoulder arthroplasty
title_full_unstemmed Two-year results of a multi-centre, randomized controlled trial comparing a second-generation uncemented trabecular metal-backed versus cemented polyethylene glenoid component in total shoulder arthroplasty
title_short Two-year results of a multi-centre, randomized controlled trial comparing a second-generation uncemented trabecular metal-backed versus cemented polyethylene glenoid component in total shoulder arthroplasty
title_sort two-year results of a multi-centre, randomized controlled trial comparing a second-generation uncemented trabecular metal-backed versus cemented polyethylene glenoid component in total shoulder arthroplasty
topic Shoulder & Elbow
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8479846/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34488426
http://dx.doi.org/10.1302/2633-1462.29.BJO-2021-0073.R1
work_keys_str_mv AT chinpatrickyk twoyearresultsofamulticentrerandomizedcontrolledtrialcomparingasecondgenerationuncementedtrabecularmetalbackedversuscementedpolyethyleneglenoidcomponentintotalshoulderarthroplasty
AT reganwilliamd twoyearresultsofamulticentrerandomizedcontrolledtrialcomparingasecondgenerationuncementedtrabecularmetalbackedversuscementedpolyethyleneglenoidcomponentintotalshoulderarthroplasty
AT plausinisderek twoyearresultsofamulticentrerandomizedcontrolledtrialcomparingasecondgenerationuncementedtrabecularmetalbackedversuscementedpolyethyleneglenoidcomponentintotalshoulderarthroplasty
AT zarzourzaned twoyearresultsofamulticentrerandomizedcontrolledtrialcomparingasecondgenerationuncementedtrabecularmetalbackedversuscementedpolyethyleneglenoidcomponentintotalshoulderarthroplasty
AT leungfay twoyearresultsofamulticentrerandomizedcontrolledtrialcomparingasecondgenerationuncementedtrabecularmetalbackedversuscementedpolyethyleneglenoidcomponentintotalshoulderarthroplasty
AT sasyniuktrenym twoyearresultsofamulticentrerandomizedcontrolledtrialcomparingasecondgenerationuncementedtrabecularmetalbackedversuscementedpolyethyleneglenoidcomponentintotalshoulderarthroplasty
AT limbrendan twoyearresultsofamulticentrerandomizedcontrolledtrialcomparingasecondgenerationuncementedtrabecularmetalbackedversuscementedpolyethyleneglenoidcomponentintotalshoulderarthroplasty
AT sayreericc twoyearresultsofamulticentrerandomizedcontrolledtrialcomparingasecondgenerationuncementedtrabecularmetalbackedversuscementedpolyethyleneglenoidcomponentintotalshoulderarthroplasty