Cargando…

Rasch analysis of the Brain Injury Screening Tool (BIST) in mild traumatic brain injury

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the psychometric properties of the Brain Injury Screening Tool (BIST) symptom scale in a sample of people with a mild Traumatic Brain Injury (mTBI) through Rasch analysis, and to obtain an interval level measurement score for potential clinical use. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Data...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Shaikh, Nusratnaaz, Theadom, Alice, Siegert, Richard, Hardaker, Natalie, King, Doug, Hume, Patria
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8479917/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34587927
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12883-021-02410-6
_version_ 1784576362154033152
author Shaikh, Nusratnaaz
Theadom, Alice
Siegert, Richard
Hardaker, Natalie
King, Doug
Hume, Patria
author_facet Shaikh, Nusratnaaz
Theadom, Alice
Siegert, Richard
Hardaker, Natalie
King, Doug
Hume, Patria
author_sort Shaikh, Nusratnaaz
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the psychometric properties of the Brain Injury Screening Tool (BIST) symptom scale in a sample of people with a mild Traumatic Brain Injury (mTBI) through Rasch analysis, and to obtain an interval level measurement score for potential clinical use. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Data were obtained from 114 adults aged over 16 years, who had experienced at least one mTBI in the past 10 years. Participants were recruited via social media, concussion clinics and sports organisations over a 4-month period between May and September 2020. Participants were asked to compete the symptom scale of the BIST tool via an anonymous online questionnaire. Internal construct validity, dimensionality, person separation index, and differential item functioning of the BIST were examined with Rasch analysis. RESULTS: BIST in its original form produced a satisfactory item-trait interaction, and good reliability, but was found to be multi-dimensional. Rasch analysis of the full scale with three domains as subtests resulted in acceptable model fit (χ(2)(6) =3.8, p >  0.05), with good reliability (Person Separation Index = 0.84), and uni-dimensionality. Differential Item Functioning (DIF) analysis displayed no significant DIF effects for sex or age revealing that people responded consistently and similarly to the individual BIST items based on severity of symptom burden. CONCLUSIONS: The 15-item symptom scale of the BIST tool is a psychometrically sound measure of symptom burden following mTBI. The findings provide support for use of both total and sub scale scores for clinical use. Ordinal to interval score conversions are recommended for use when using the scores for research purposes in mTBI.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8479917
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-84799172021-09-29 Rasch analysis of the Brain Injury Screening Tool (BIST) in mild traumatic brain injury Shaikh, Nusratnaaz Theadom, Alice Siegert, Richard Hardaker, Natalie King, Doug Hume, Patria BMC Neurol Research OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the psychometric properties of the Brain Injury Screening Tool (BIST) symptom scale in a sample of people with a mild Traumatic Brain Injury (mTBI) through Rasch analysis, and to obtain an interval level measurement score for potential clinical use. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Data were obtained from 114 adults aged over 16 years, who had experienced at least one mTBI in the past 10 years. Participants were recruited via social media, concussion clinics and sports organisations over a 4-month period between May and September 2020. Participants were asked to compete the symptom scale of the BIST tool via an anonymous online questionnaire. Internal construct validity, dimensionality, person separation index, and differential item functioning of the BIST were examined with Rasch analysis. RESULTS: BIST in its original form produced a satisfactory item-trait interaction, and good reliability, but was found to be multi-dimensional. Rasch analysis of the full scale with three domains as subtests resulted in acceptable model fit (χ(2)(6) =3.8, p >  0.05), with good reliability (Person Separation Index = 0.84), and uni-dimensionality. Differential Item Functioning (DIF) analysis displayed no significant DIF effects for sex or age revealing that people responded consistently and similarly to the individual BIST items based on severity of symptom burden. CONCLUSIONS: The 15-item symptom scale of the BIST tool is a psychometrically sound measure of symptom burden following mTBI. The findings provide support for use of both total and sub scale scores for clinical use. Ordinal to interval score conversions are recommended for use when using the scores for research purposes in mTBI. BioMed Central 2021-09-29 /pmc/articles/PMC8479917/ /pubmed/34587927 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12883-021-02410-6 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Shaikh, Nusratnaaz
Theadom, Alice
Siegert, Richard
Hardaker, Natalie
King, Doug
Hume, Patria
Rasch analysis of the Brain Injury Screening Tool (BIST) in mild traumatic brain injury
title Rasch analysis of the Brain Injury Screening Tool (BIST) in mild traumatic brain injury
title_full Rasch analysis of the Brain Injury Screening Tool (BIST) in mild traumatic brain injury
title_fullStr Rasch analysis of the Brain Injury Screening Tool (BIST) in mild traumatic brain injury
title_full_unstemmed Rasch analysis of the Brain Injury Screening Tool (BIST) in mild traumatic brain injury
title_short Rasch analysis of the Brain Injury Screening Tool (BIST) in mild traumatic brain injury
title_sort rasch analysis of the brain injury screening tool (bist) in mild traumatic brain injury
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8479917/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34587927
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12883-021-02410-6
work_keys_str_mv AT shaikhnusratnaaz raschanalysisofthebraininjuryscreeningtoolbistinmildtraumaticbraininjury
AT theadomalice raschanalysisofthebraininjuryscreeningtoolbistinmildtraumaticbraininjury
AT siegertrichard raschanalysisofthebraininjuryscreeningtoolbistinmildtraumaticbraininjury
AT hardakernatalie raschanalysisofthebraininjuryscreeningtoolbistinmildtraumaticbraininjury
AT kingdoug raschanalysisofthebraininjuryscreeningtoolbistinmildtraumaticbraininjury
AT humepatria raschanalysisofthebraininjuryscreeningtoolbistinmildtraumaticbraininjury