Cargando…
C-STICH: Cerclage Suture Type for an Insufficient Cervix and its effect on Health outcomes—a multicentre randomised controlled trial
BACKGROUND: Preterm birth is associated with significant mortality and morbidity for mothers and babies. Women are identified as high risk for preterm birth based on either previous medical/pregnancy history or on ultrasound assessment of the cervix. Women identified as high risk can be offered a ce...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8479931/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34583760 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-021-05629-3 |
_version_ | 1784576365450756096 |
---|---|
author | Israfil-Bayli, Fidan Morton, Victoria Hodgetts Hewitt, Catherine A. Ewer, Andrew K. Gray, Jim Norman, Jane Lees, Christoph Simpson, Nigel A. B. Shennan, Andrew Tryposkiadis, Konstantinos Hughes, Max Daniels, Jane Brocklehurst, Peter Morris, Katie Middleton, Lee Toozs-Hobson, Philip |
author_facet | Israfil-Bayli, Fidan Morton, Victoria Hodgetts Hewitt, Catherine A. Ewer, Andrew K. Gray, Jim Norman, Jane Lees, Christoph Simpson, Nigel A. B. Shennan, Andrew Tryposkiadis, Konstantinos Hughes, Max Daniels, Jane Brocklehurst, Peter Morris, Katie Middleton, Lee Toozs-Hobson, Philip |
author_sort | Israfil-Bayli, Fidan |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Preterm birth is associated with significant mortality and morbidity for mothers and babies. Women are identified as high risk for preterm birth based on either previous medical/pregnancy history or on ultrasound assessment of the cervix. Women identified as high risk can be offered a cervical cerclage (a purse string stitch) around the cervix (neck of the womb) to reduce the risk of preterm birth. In women who have a cervical cerclage, the procedure can be performed using either a monofilament (single-stranded) or braided (woven) suture material. Both suture materials are routinely used for cervical cerclage and there is uncertainty as to which is superior. METHODS: A multicentre, open, randomised controlled superiority trial of 2050 women presenting at obstetric units, deemed to be at risk of preterm birth and already scheduled to have a cervical cerclage as part of their standard care. Inclusion criteria include singleton pregnancies and an indication for cervical cerclage for either a history of three or more previous mid-trimester losses or premature births (≤ 28 weeks), insertion of cervical sutures in previous pregnancies, a history of mid trimester loss or premature birth with a (current) shortened (≤ 25 mm) cervix, or women whom clinicians deem to be at risk of preterm birth either by history or the results of an ultrasound scan. Exclusion criteria include women who have taken part in C-STICH previously, are aged less than 18 years old at the time of presentation, require a rescue cerclage, and are unwilling or unable to give informed consent and in whom a cerclage will be placed by any route other than vaginally (e.g. via an abdominal route). Following informed consent, women are randomised on a 1:1 basis to either monofilament or braided suture, by minimisation. The primary outcome is pregnancy loss (miscarriage and perinatal mortality, including any stillbirth or neonatal death in the first week of life), and secondary outcomes include the core outcome set for preterm birth trials. DISCUSSION: Optimising established interventions to prevent preterm birth is important in reducing perinatal mortality rates. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ISRCTN 15373349. Registered before recruitment on 03 December 2014 prior to first recruit. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8479931 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-84799312021-09-29 C-STICH: Cerclage Suture Type for an Insufficient Cervix and its effect on Health outcomes—a multicentre randomised controlled trial Israfil-Bayli, Fidan Morton, Victoria Hodgetts Hewitt, Catherine A. Ewer, Andrew K. Gray, Jim Norman, Jane Lees, Christoph Simpson, Nigel A. B. Shennan, Andrew Tryposkiadis, Konstantinos Hughes, Max Daniels, Jane Brocklehurst, Peter Morris, Katie Middleton, Lee Toozs-Hobson, Philip Trials Study Protocol BACKGROUND: Preterm birth is associated with significant mortality and morbidity for mothers and babies. Women are identified as high risk for preterm birth based on either previous medical/pregnancy history or on ultrasound assessment of the cervix. Women identified as high risk can be offered a cervical cerclage (a purse string stitch) around the cervix (neck of the womb) to reduce the risk of preterm birth. In women who have a cervical cerclage, the procedure can be performed using either a monofilament (single-stranded) or braided (woven) suture material. Both suture materials are routinely used for cervical cerclage and there is uncertainty as to which is superior. METHODS: A multicentre, open, randomised controlled superiority trial of 2050 women presenting at obstetric units, deemed to be at risk of preterm birth and already scheduled to have a cervical cerclage as part of their standard care. Inclusion criteria include singleton pregnancies and an indication for cervical cerclage for either a history of three or more previous mid-trimester losses or premature births (≤ 28 weeks), insertion of cervical sutures in previous pregnancies, a history of mid trimester loss or premature birth with a (current) shortened (≤ 25 mm) cervix, or women whom clinicians deem to be at risk of preterm birth either by history or the results of an ultrasound scan. Exclusion criteria include women who have taken part in C-STICH previously, are aged less than 18 years old at the time of presentation, require a rescue cerclage, and are unwilling or unable to give informed consent and in whom a cerclage will be placed by any route other than vaginally (e.g. via an abdominal route). Following informed consent, women are randomised on a 1:1 basis to either monofilament or braided suture, by minimisation. The primary outcome is pregnancy loss (miscarriage and perinatal mortality, including any stillbirth or neonatal death in the first week of life), and secondary outcomes include the core outcome set for preterm birth trials. DISCUSSION: Optimising established interventions to prevent preterm birth is important in reducing perinatal mortality rates. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ISRCTN 15373349. Registered before recruitment on 03 December 2014 prior to first recruit. BioMed Central 2021-09-28 /pmc/articles/PMC8479931/ /pubmed/34583760 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-021-05629-3 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Study Protocol Israfil-Bayli, Fidan Morton, Victoria Hodgetts Hewitt, Catherine A. Ewer, Andrew K. Gray, Jim Norman, Jane Lees, Christoph Simpson, Nigel A. B. Shennan, Andrew Tryposkiadis, Konstantinos Hughes, Max Daniels, Jane Brocklehurst, Peter Morris, Katie Middleton, Lee Toozs-Hobson, Philip C-STICH: Cerclage Suture Type for an Insufficient Cervix and its effect on Health outcomes—a multicentre randomised controlled trial |
title | C-STICH: Cerclage Suture Type for an Insufficient Cervix and its effect on Health outcomes—a multicentre randomised controlled trial |
title_full | C-STICH: Cerclage Suture Type for an Insufficient Cervix and its effect on Health outcomes—a multicentre randomised controlled trial |
title_fullStr | C-STICH: Cerclage Suture Type for an Insufficient Cervix and its effect on Health outcomes—a multicentre randomised controlled trial |
title_full_unstemmed | C-STICH: Cerclage Suture Type for an Insufficient Cervix and its effect on Health outcomes—a multicentre randomised controlled trial |
title_short | C-STICH: Cerclage Suture Type for an Insufficient Cervix and its effect on Health outcomes—a multicentre randomised controlled trial |
title_sort | c-stich: cerclage suture type for an insufficient cervix and its effect on health outcomes—a multicentre randomised controlled trial |
topic | Study Protocol |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8479931/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34583760 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-021-05629-3 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT israfilbaylifidan cstichcerclagesuturetypeforaninsufficientcervixanditseffectonhealthoutcomesamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrial AT mortonvictoriahodgetts cstichcerclagesuturetypeforaninsufficientcervixanditseffectonhealthoutcomesamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrial AT hewittcatherinea cstichcerclagesuturetypeforaninsufficientcervixanditseffectonhealthoutcomesamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrial AT ewerandrewk cstichcerclagesuturetypeforaninsufficientcervixanditseffectonhealthoutcomesamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrial AT grayjim cstichcerclagesuturetypeforaninsufficientcervixanditseffectonhealthoutcomesamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrial AT normanjane cstichcerclagesuturetypeforaninsufficientcervixanditseffectonhealthoutcomesamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrial AT leeschristoph cstichcerclagesuturetypeforaninsufficientcervixanditseffectonhealthoutcomesamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrial AT simpsonnigelab cstichcerclagesuturetypeforaninsufficientcervixanditseffectonhealthoutcomesamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrial AT shennanandrew cstichcerclagesuturetypeforaninsufficientcervixanditseffectonhealthoutcomesamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrial AT tryposkiadiskonstantinos cstichcerclagesuturetypeforaninsufficientcervixanditseffectonhealthoutcomesamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrial AT hughesmax cstichcerclagesuturetypeforaninsufficientcervixanditseffectonhealthoutcomesamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrial AT danielsjane cstichcerclagesuturetypeforaninsufficientcervixanditseffectonhealthoutcomesamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrial AT brocklehurstpeter cstichcerclagesuturetypeforaninsufficientcervixanditseffectonhealthoutcomesamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrial AT morriskatie cstichcerclagesuturetypeforaninsufficientcervixanditseffectonhealthoutcomesamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrial AT middletonlee cstichcerclagesuturetypeforaninsufficientcervixanditseffectonhealthoutcomesamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrial AT toozshobsonphilip cstichcerclagesuturetypeforaninsufficientcervixanditseffectonhealthoutcomesamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrial |