Cargando…

C-STICH: Cerclage Suture Type for an Insufficient Cervix and its effect on Health outcomes—a multicentre randomised controlled trial

BACKGROUND: Preterm birth is associated with significant mortality and morbidity for mothers and babies. Women are identified as high risk for preterm birth based on either previous medical/pregnancy history or on ultrasound assessment of the cervix. Women identified as high risk can be offered a ce...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Israfil-Bayli, Fidan, Morton, Victoria Hodgetts, Hewitt, Catherine A., Ewer, Andrew K., Gray, Jim, Norman, Jane, Lees, Christoph, Simpson, Nigel A. B., Shennan, Andrew, Tryposkiadis, Konstantinos, Hughes, Max, Daniels, Jane, Brocklehurst, Peter, Morris, Katie, Middleton, Lee, Toozs-Hobson, Philip
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8479931/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34583760
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-021-05629-3
_version_ 1784576365450756096
author Israfil-Bayli, Fidan
Morton, Victoria Hodgetts
Hewitt, Catherine A.
Ewer, Andrew K.
Gray, Jim
Norman, Jane
Lees, Christoph
Simpson, Nigel A. B.
Shennan, Andrew
Tryposkiadis, Konstantinos
Hughes, Max
Daniels, Jane
Brocklehurst, Peter
Morris, Katie
Middleton, Lee
Toozs-Hobson, Philip
author_facet Israfil-Bayli, Fidan
Morton, Victoria Hodgetts
Hewitt, Catherine A.
Ewer, Andrew K.
Gray, Jim
Norman, Jane
Lees, Christoph
Simpson, Nigel A. B.
Shennan, Andrew
Tryposkiadis, Konstantinos
Hughes, Max
Daniels, Jane
Brocklehurst, Peter
Morris, Katie
Middleton, Lee
Toozs-Hobson, Philip
author_sort Israfil-Bayli, Fidan
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Preterm birth is associated with significant mortality and morbidity for mothers and babies. Women are identified as high risk for preterm birth based on either previous medical/pregnancy history or on ultrasound assessment of the cervix. Women identified as high risk can be offered a cervical cerclage (a purse string stitch) around the cervix (neck of the womb) to reduce the risk of preterm birth. In women who have a cervical cerclage, the procedure can be performed using either a monofilament (single-stranded) or braided (woven) suture material. Both suture materials are routinely used for cervical cerclage and there is uncertainty as to which is superior. METHODS: A multicentre, open, randomised controlled superiority trial of 2050 women presenting at obstetric units, deemed to be at risk of preterm birth and already scheduled to have a cervical cerclage as part of their standard care. Inclusion criteria include singleton pregnancies and an indication for cervical cerclage for either a history of three or more previous mid-trimester losses or premature births (≤ 28 weeks), insertion of cervical sutures in previous pregnancies, a history of mid trimester loss or premature birth with a (current) shortened (≤ 25 mm) cervix, or women whom clinicians deem to be at risk of preterm birth either by history or the results of an ultrasound scan. Exclusion criteria include women who have taken part in C-STICH previously, are aged less than 18 years old at the time of presentation, require a rescue cerclage, and are unwilling or unable to give informed consent and in whom a cerclage will be placed by any route other than vaginally (e.g. via an abdominal route). Following informed consent, women are randomised on a 1:1 basis to either monofilament or braided suture, by minimisation. The primary outcome is pregnancy loss (miscarriage and perinatal mortality, including any stillbirth or neonatal death in the first week of life), and secondary outcomes include the core outcome set for preterm birth trials. DISCUSSION: Optimising established interventions to prevent preterm birth is important in reducing perinatal mortality rates. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ISRCTN 15373349. Registered before recruitment on 03 December 2014 prior to first recruit.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8479931
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-84799312021-09-29 C-STICH: Cerclage Suture Type for an Insufficient Cervix and its effect on Health outcomes—a multicentre randomised controlled trial Israfil-Bayli, Fidan Morton, Victoria Hodgetts Hewitt, Catherine A. Ewer, Andrew K. Gray, Jim Norman, Jane Lees, Christoph Simpson, Nigel A. B. Shennan, Andrew Tryposkiadis, Konstantinos Hughes, Max Daniels, Jane Brocklehurst, Peter Morris, Katie Middleton, Lee Toozs-Hobson, Philip Trials Study Protocol BACKGROUND: Preterm birth is associated with significant mortality and morbidity for mothers and babies. Women are identified as high risk for preterm birth based on either previous medical/pregnancy history or on ultrasound assessment of the cervix. Women identified as high risk can be offered a cervical cerclage (a purse string stitch) around the cervix (neck of the womb) to reduce the risk of preterm birth. In women who have a cervical cerclage, the procedure can be performed using either a monofilament (single-stranded) or braided (woven) suture material. Both suture materials are routinely used for cervical cerclage and there is uncertainty as to which is superior. METHODS: A multicentre, open, randomised controlled superiority trial of 2050 women presenting at obstetric units, deemed to be at risk of preterm birth and already scheduled to have a cervical cerclage as part of their standard care. Inclusion criteria include singleton pregnancies and an indication for cervical cerclage for either a history of three or more previous mid-trimester losses or premature births (≤ 28 weeks), insertion of cervical sutures in previous pregnancies, a history of mid trimester loss or premature birth with a (current) shortened (≤ 25 mm) cervix, or women whom clinicians deem to be at risk of preterm birth either by history or the results of an ultrasound scan. Exclusion criteria include women who have taken part in C-STICH previously, are aged less than 18 years old at the time of presentation, require a rescue cerclage, and are unwilling or unable to give informed consent and in whom a cerclage will be placed by any route other than vaginally (e.g. via an abdominal route). Following informed consent, women are randomised on a 1:1 basis to either monofilament or braided suture, by minimisation. The primary outcome is pregnancy loss (miscarriage and perinatal mortality, including any stillbirth or neonatal death in the first week of life), and secondary outcomes include the core outcome set for preterm birth trials. DISCUSSION: Optimising established interventions to prevent preterm birth is important in reducing perinatal mortality rates. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ISRCTN 15373349. Registered before recruitment on 03 December 2014 prior to first recruit. BioMed Central 2021-09-28 /pmc/articles/PMC8479931/ /pubmed/34583760 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-021-05629-3 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Study Protocol
Israfil-Bayli, Fidan
Morton, Victoria Hodgetts
Hewitt, Catherine A.
Ewer, Andrew K.
Gray, Jim
Norman, Jane
Lees, Christoph
Simpson, Nigel A. B.
Shennan, Andrew
Tryposkiadis, Konstantinos
Hughes, Max
Daniels, Jane
Brocklehurst, Peter
Morris, Katie
Middleton, Lee
Toozs-Hobson, Philip
C-STICH: Cerclage Suture Type for an Insufficient Cervix and its effect on Health outcomes—a multicentre randomised controlled trial
title C-STICH: Cerclage Suture Type for an Insufficient Cervix and its effect on Health outcomes—a multicentre randomised controlled trial
title_full C-STICH: Cerclage Suture Type for an Insufficient Cervix and its effect on Health outcomes—a multicentre randomised controlled trial
title_fullStr C-STICH: Cerclage Suture Type for an Insufficient Cervix and its effect on Health outcomes—a multicentre randomised controlled trial
title_full_unstemmed C-STICH: Cerclage Suture Type for an Insufficient Cervix and its effect on Health outcomes—a multicentre randomised controlled trial
title_short C-STICH: Cerclage Suture Type for an Insufficient Cervix and its effect on Health outcomes—a multicentre randomised controlled trial
title_sort c-stich: cerclage suture type for an insufficient cervix and its effect on health outcomes—a multicentre randomised controlled trial
topic Study Protocol
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8479931/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34583760
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-021-05629-3
work_keys_str_mv AT israfilbaylifidan cstichcerclagesuturetypeforaninsufficientcervixanditseffectonhealthoutcomesamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT mortonvictoriahodgetts cstichcerclagesuturetypeforaninsufficientcervixanditseffectonhealthoutcomesamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT hewittcatherinea cstichcerclagesuturetypeforaninsufficientcervixanditseffectonhealthoutcomesamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT ewerandrewk cstichcerclagesuturetypeforaninsufficientcervixanditseffectonhealthoutcomesamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT grayjim cstichcerclagesuturetypeforaninsufficientcervixanditseffectonhealthoutcomesamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT normanjane cstichcerclagesuturetypeforaninsufficientcervixanditseffectonhealthoutcomesamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT leeschristoph cstichcerclagesuturetypeforaninsufficientcervixanditseffectonhealthoutcomesamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT simpsonnigelab cstichcerclagesuturetypeforaninsufficientcervixanditseffectonhealthoutcomesamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT shennanandrew cstichcerclagesuturetypeforaninsufficientcervixanditseffectonhealthoutcomesamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT tryposkiadiskonstantinos cstichcerclagesuturetypeforaninsufficientcervixanditseffectonhealthoutcomesamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT hughesmax cstichcerclagesuturetypeforaninsufficientcervixanditseffectonhealthoutcomesamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT danielsjane cstichcerclagesuturetypeforaninsufficientcervixanditseffectonhealthoutcomesamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT brocklehurstpeter cstichcerclagesuturetypeforaninsufficientcervixanditseffectonhealthoutcomesamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT morriskatie cstichcerclagesuturetypeforaninsufficientcervixanditseffectonhealthoutcomesamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT middletonlee cstichcerclagesuturetypeforaninsufficientcervixanditseffectonhealthoutcomesamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT toozshobsonphilip cstichcerclagesuturetypeforaninsufficientcervixanditseffectonhealthoutcomesamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrial