Cargando…
Cross-cultural validation of the IRB Researcher Assessment Tool: Chinese Version
BACKGROUND: Using an effective method for evaluating Institutional Review Board (IRB) performance is essential for ensuring an IRB’s effectiveness, efficiency, and compliance with applicable human research standards and organizational policies. Currently, no empirical research has yet been published...
Autores principales: | Liu, Xing, Wu, Ying, Yang, Min, Li, Yang, Hahne, Jessica, Khoshnood, Kaveh, Coleman, Linda, Wang, Xiaomin |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8479956/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34583718 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12910-021-00699-z |
Ejemplares similares
-
Performance of IRBs in China: a survey on IRB employees and researchers’ experiences and perceptions
por: Liu, Xing, et al.
Publicado: (2022) -
How local IRBs view central IRBs in the US
por: Klitzman, Robert
Publicado: (2011) -
The IRB structure and medical research reform
por: Babyar, Julie
Publicado: (2018) -
Knowledge and attitudes of Chinese medical postgraduates toward research ethics and research ethics committees: a cross-sectional study
por: Liu, Xing, et al.
Publicado: (2023) -
Chinese physicians’ perceptions of palliative care integration for advanced cancer patients: a qualitative analysis at a tertiary hospital in Changsha, China
por: Hahne, Jessica, et al.
Publicado: (2022)