Cargando…
Enablers and barriers to effective clinical supervision in the workplace: a rapid evidence review
OBJECTIVES: We aimed to review the international literature to understand the enablers of and barriers to effective clinical supervision in the workplace and identify the benefits of effective clinical supervision. DESIGN: A rapid evidence review. DATA SOURCES: Five databases (CINAHL, OVID Embase, O...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8479981/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34588261 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-052929 |
_version_ | 1784576377529303040 |
---|---|
author | Rothwell, Charlotte Kehoe, Amelia Farook, Sophia Farhene Illing, Jan |
author_facet | Rothwell, Charlotte Kehoe, Amelia Farook, Sophia Farhene Illing, Jan |
author_sort | Rothwell, Charlotte |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVES: We aimed to review the international literature to understand the enablers of and barriers to effective clinical supervision in the workplace and identify the benefits of effective clinical supervision. DESIGN: A rapid evidence review. DATA SOURCES: Five databases (CINAHL, OVID Embase, OVID Medline, OVID PsycInfo and ProQuest) were searched to ensure inclusion and breadth of healthcare professionals. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: Studies identifying enablers and barriers to effective clinical supervision across healthcare professionals in a Western context between 1 January 2009 and 12 March 2019. DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS: An extraction framework with a detailed inclusion/exclusion criteria to ensure rigour was used to extract data. Data were analysed using a thematic qualitative synthesis. These themes were used to answer the research objectives. RESULTS: The search identified 15 922 papers, reduced to 809 papers following the removal of duplicates and papers outside the inclusion criteria, with 135 papers being included in the full review. Enablers identified included regular supervision, occurs within protected time, in a private space and delivered flexibly. Additional enablers included supervisees being offered a choice of supervisor; supervision based on mutual trust and a positive relationship; a cultural understanding between supervisor and supervisee; a shared understanding of the purpose of supervision, based on individual needs, focused on enhancing knowledge and skills; training and feedback being provided for supervisors; and use of a mixed supervisor model, delivered by several supervisors, or by those trained to manage the overlapping (and potentially conflicting) needs of the individual and the service. Barriers included a lack of time, space and trust. A lack of shared understanding to the purpose of the supervision, and a lack of ongoing support and engagement from leadership and organisations were also found to be barriers to effective clinical supervision. CONCLUSIONS: This review identified several enablers of and barriers to effective clinical supervision and the subsequent benefits of effective clinical supervision in a healthcare setting. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8479981 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-84799812021-10-08 Enablers and barriers to effective clinical supervision in the workplace: a rapid evidence review Rothwell, Charlotte Kehoe, Amelia Farook, Sophia Farhene Illing, Jan BMJ Open Medical Education and Training OBJECTIVES: We aimed to review the international literature to understand the enablers of and barriers to effective clinical supervision in the workplace and identify the benefits of effective clinical supervision. DESIGN: A rapid evidence review. DATA SOURCES: Five databases (CINAHL, OVID Embase, OVID Medline, OVID PsycInfo and ProQuest) were searched to ensure inclusion and breadth of healthcare professionals. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: Studies identifying enablers and barriers to effective clinical supervision across healthcare professionals in a Western context between 1 January 2009 and 12 March 2019. DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS: An extraction framework with a detailed inclusion/exclusion criteria to ensure rigour was used to extract data. Data were analysed using a thematic qualitative synthesis. These themes were used to answer the research objectives. RESULTS: The search identified 15 922 papers, reduced to 809 papers following the removal of duplicates and papers outside the inclusion criteria, with 135 papers being included in the full review. Enablers identified included regular supervision, occurs within protected time, in a private space and delivered flexibly. Additional enablers included supervisees being offered a choice of supervisor; supervision based on mutual trust and a positive relationship; a cultural understanding between supervisor and supervisee; a shared understanding of the purpose of supervision, based on individual needs, focused on enhancing knowledge and skills; training and feedback being provided for supervisors; and use of a mixed supervisor model, delivered by several supervisors, or by those trained to manage the overlapping (and potentially conflicting) needs of the individual and the service. Barriers included a lack of time, space and trust. A lack of shared understanding to the purpose of the supervision, and a lack of ongoing support and engagement from leadership and organisations were also found to be barriers to effective clinical supervision. CONCLUSIONS: This review identified several enablers of and barriers to effective clinical supervision and the subsequent benefits of effective clinical supervision in a healthcare setting. BMJ Publishing Group 2021-09-28 /pmc/articles/PMC8479981/ /pubmed/34588261 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-052929 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Medical Education and Training Rothwell, Charlotte Kehoe, Amelia Farook, Sophia Farhene Illing, Jan Enablers and barriers to effective clinical supervision in the workplace: a rapid evidence review |
title | Enablers and barriers to effective clinical supervision in the workplace: a rapid evidence review |
title_full | Enablers and barriers to effective clinical supervision in the workplace: a rapid evidence review |
title_fullStr | Enablers and barriers to effective clinical supervision in the workplace: a rapid evidence review |
title_full_unstemmed | Enablers and barriers to effective clinical supervision in the workplace: a rapid evidence review |
title_short | Enablers and barriers to effective clinical supervision in the workplace: a rapid evidence review |
title_sort | enablers and barriers to effective clinical supervision in the workplace: a rapid evidence review |
topic | Medical Education and Training |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8479981/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34588261 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-052929 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT rothwellcharlotte enablersandbarrierstoeffectiveclinicalsupervisionintheworkplacearapidevidencereview AT kehoeamelia enablersandbarrierstoeffectiveclinicalsupervisionintheworkplacearapidevidencereview AT farooksophiafarhene enablersandbarrierstoeffectiveclinicalsupervisionintheworkplacearapidevidencereview AT illingjan enablersandbarrierstoeffectiveclinicalsupervisionintheworkplacearapidevidencereview |