Cargando…
Bench to bedside radiosensitizer development strategy for newly diagnosed glioblastoma
Glioblastoma is the most common primary brain malignancy and carries with it a poor prognosis. New agents are urgently needed, however nearly all Phase III trials of GBM patients of the past 25 years have failed to demonstrate improvement in outcomes. In 2019, the National Cancer Institute Clinical...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8480070/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34583727 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13014-021-01918-y |
_version_ | 1784576396015697920 |
---|---|
author | Degorre, Charlotte Tofilon, Philip Camphausen, Kevin Mathen, Peter |
author_facet | Degorre, Charlotte Tofilon, Philip Camphausen, Kevin Mathen, Peter |
author_sort | Degorre, Charlotte |
collection | PubMed |
description | Glioblastoma is the most common primary brain malignancy and carries with it a poor prognosis. New agents are urgently needed, however nearly all Phase III trials of GBM patients of the past 25 years have failed to demonstrate improvement in outcomes. In 2019, the National Cancer Institute Clinical Trials and Translational Research Advisory Committee (CTAC) Glioblastoma Working Group (GBM WG) identified 5 broad areas of research thought to be important in the development of new herapeutics for GBM. Among those was optimizing radioresponse for GBM in situ. One such strategy to increase radiation efficacy is the addition of a radiosensitizer to improve the therapeutic ratio by enhancing tumor sensitivity while ideally having minimal to no effect on normal tissue. Historically the majority of trials using radiosensitizers have been unsuccessful, but they provide important guidance in what is required to develop agents more efficiently. Improved target selection is essential for a drug to provide maximal benefit, and once that target is identified it must be validated through pre-clinical studies. Careful selection of appropriate in vitro and in vivo models to demonstrate increased radiosensitivity and suitable bioavailability are then necessary to prove that a drug warrants advancement to clinical investigation. Once investigational agents are validated pre-clinically, patient trials require consistency both in terms of planning study design as well as reporting efficacy and toxicity in order to assess the potential benefit of the drug. Through this paper we hope to outline strategies for developing effective radiosensitizers against GBM using as models the examples of XPO1 inhibitors and HDAC inhibitors developed from our own lab. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8480070 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-84800702021-09-30 Bench to bedside radiosensitizer development strategy for newly diagnosed glioblastoma Degorre, Charlotte Tofilon, Philip Camphausen, Kevin Mathen, Peter Radiat Oncol Review Glioblastoma is the most common primary brain malignancy and carries with it a poor prognosis. New agents are urgently needed, however nearly all Phase III trials of GBM patients of the past 25 years have failed to demonstrate improvement in outcomes. In 2019, the National Cancer Institute Clinical Trials and Translational Research Advisory Committee (CTAC) Glioblastoma Working Group (GBM WG) identified 5 broad areas of research thought to be important in the development of new herapeutics for GBM. Among those was optimizing radioresponse for GBM in situ. One such strategy to increase radiation efficacy is the addition of a radiosensitizer to improve the therapeutic ratio by enhancing tumor sensitivity while ideally having minimal to no effect on normal tissue. Historically the majority of trials using radiosensitizers have been unsuccessful, but they provide important guidance in what is required to develop agents more efficiently. Improved target selection is essential for a drug to provide maximal benefit, and once that target is identified it must be validated through pre-clinical studies. Careful selection of appropriate in vitro and in vivo models to demonstrate increased radiosensitivity and suitable bioavailability are then necessary to prove that a drug warrants advancement to clinical investigation. Once investigational agents are validated pre-clinically, patient trials require consistency both in terms of planning study design as well as reporting efficacy and toxicity in order to assess the potential benefit of the drug. Through this paper we hope to outline strategies for developing effective radiosensitizers against GBM using as models the examples of XPO1 inhibitors and HDAC inhibitors developed from our own lab. BioMed Central 2021-09-28 /pmc/articles/PMC8480070/ /pubmed/34583727 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13014-021-01918-y Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Review Degorre, Charlotte Tofilon, Philip Camphausen, Kevin Mathen, Peter Bench to bedside radiosensitizer development strategy for newly diagnosed glioblastoma |
title | Bench to bedside radiosensitizer development strategy for newly diagnosed glioblastoma |
title_full | Bench to bedside radiosensitizer development strategy for newly diagnosed glioblastoma |
title_fullStr | Bench to bedside radiosensitizer development strategy for newly diagnosed glioblastoma |
title_full_unstemmed | Bench to bedside radiosensitizer development strategy for newly diagnosed glioblastoma |
title_short | Bench to bedside radiosensitizer development strategy for newly diagnosed glioblastoma |
title_sort | bench to bedside radiosensitizer development strategy for newly diagnosed glioblastoma |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8480070/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34583727 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13014-021-01918-y |
work_keys_str_mv | AT degorrecharlotte benchtobedsideradiosensitizerdevelopmentstrategyfornewlydiagnosedglioblastoma AT tofilonphilip benchtobedsideradiosensitizerdevelopmentstrategyfornewlydiagnosedglioblastoma AT camphausenkevin benchtobedsideradiosensitizerdevelopmentstrategyfornewlydiagnosedglioblastoma AT mathenpeter benchtobedsideradiosensitizerdevelopmentstrategyfornewlydiagnosedglioblastoma |