Cargando…

The specificity of Babesia-tick vector interactions: recent advances and pitfalls in molecular and field studies

BACKGROUND: Babesia spp. are protozoan parasites of great medical and veterinary importance, especially in the northern Hemisphere. Ticks are known vectors of Babesia spp., although some Babesia-tick interactions have not been fully elucidated. METHODS: The present review was performed to investigat...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bajer, Anna, Dwużnik-Szarek, Dorota
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8480096/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34583754
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13071-021-05019-3
_version_ 1784576402172936192
author Bajer, Anna
Dwużnik-Szarek, Dorota
author_facet Bajer, Anna
Dwużnik-Szarek, Dorota
author_sort Bajer, Anna
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Babesia spp. are protozoan parasites of great medical and veterinary importance, especially in the northern Hemisphere. Ticks are known vectors of Babesia spp., although some Babesia-tick interactions have not been fully elucidated. METHODS: The present review was performed to investigate the specificity of Babesia-tick species interactions that have been identified using molecular techniques in studies conducted in the last 20 years under field conditions. We aimed to indicate the main vectors of important Babesia species based on published research papers (n = 129) and molecular data derived from the GenBank database. RESULTS: Repeated observations of certain Babesia species in specific species and genera of ticks in numerous independent studies, carried out in different areas and years, have been considered epidemiological evidence of established Babesia-tick interactions. The best studied species of ticks are Ixodes ricinus, Dermacentor reticulatus and Ixodes scapularis (103 reports, i.e. 80% of total reports). Eco-epidemiological studies have confirmed a specific relationship between Babesia microti and Ixodes ricinus, Ixodes persulcatus, and Ixodes scapularis and also between Babesia canis and D. reticulatus. Additionally, four Babesia species (and one genotype), which have different deer species as reservoir hosts, displayed specificity to the I. ricinus complex. Eco-epidemiological studies do not support interactions between a high number of Babesia spp. and I. ricinus or D. reticulatus. Interestingly, pioneering studies on other species and genera of ticks have revealed the existence of likely new Babesia species, which need more scientific attention. Finally, we discuss the detection of Babesia spp. in feeding ticks and critically evaluate the data on the role of the latter as vectors. CONCLUSIONS: Epidemiological data have confirmed the specificity of certain Babesia-tick vector interactions. The massive amount of data that has been thus far collected for the most common tick species needs to be complemented by more intensive studies on Babesia infections in underrepresented tick species. GRAPHICAL ABSTRACT: [Image: see text] SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13071-021-05019-3.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8480096
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-84800962021-09-30 The specificity of Babesia-tick vector interactions: recent advances and pitfalls in molecular and field studies Bajer, Anna Dwużnik-Szarek, Dorota Parasit Vectors Review BACKGROUND: Babesia spp. are protozoan parasites of great medical and veterinary importance, especially in the northern Hemisphere. Ticks are known vectors of Babesia spp., although some Babesia-tick interactions have not been fully elucidated. METHODS: The present review was performed to investigate the specificity of Babesia-tick species interactions that have been identified using molecular techniques in studies conducted in the last 20 years under field conditions. We aimed to indicate the main vectors of important Babesia species based on published research papers (n = 129) and molecular data derived from the GenBank database. RESULTS: Repeated observations of certain Babesia species in specific species and genera of ticks in numerous independent studies, carried out in different areas and years, have been considered epidemiological evidence of established Babesia-tick interactions. The best studied species of ticks are Ixodes ricinus, Dermacentor reticulatus and Ixodes scapularis (103 reports, i.e. 80% of total reports). Eco-epidemiological studies have confirmed a specific relationship between Babesia microti and Ixodes ricinus, Ixodes persulcatus, and Ixodes scapularis and also between Babesia canis and D. reticulatus. Additionally, four Babesia species (and one genotype), which have different deer species as reservoir hosts, displayed specificity to the I. ricinus complex. Eco-epidemiological studies do not support interactions between a high number of Babesia spp. and I. ricinus or D. reticulatus. Interestingly, pioneering studies on other species and genera of ticks have revealed the existence of likely new Babesia species, which need more scientific attention. Finally, we discuss the detection of Babesia spp. in feeding ticks and critically evaluate the data on the role of the latter as vectors. CONCLUSIONS: Epidemiological data have confirmed the specificity of certain Babesia-tick vector interactions. The massive amount of data that has been thus far collected for the most common tick species needs to be complemented by more intensive studies on Babesia infections in underrepresented tick species. GRAPHICAL ABSTRACT: [Image: see text] SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13071-021-05019-3. BioMed Central 2021-09-28 /pmc/articles/PMC8480096/ /pubmed/34583754 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13071-021-05019-3 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Review
Bajer, Anna
Dwużnik-Szarek, Dorota
The specificity of Babesia-tick vector interactions: recent advances and pitfalls in molecular and field studies
title The specificity of Babesia-tick vector interactions: recent advances and pitfalls in molecular and field studies
title_full The specificity of Babesia-tick vector interactions: recent advances and pitfalls in molecular and field studies
title_fullStr The specificity of Babesia-tick vector interactions: recent advances and pitfalls in molecular and field studies
title_full_unstemmed The specificity of Babesia-tick vector interactions: recent advances and pitfalls in molecular and field studies
title_short The specificity of Babesia-tick vector interactions: recent advances and pitfalls in molecular and field studies
title_sort specificity of babesia-tick vector interactions: recent advances and pitfalls in molecular and field studies
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8480096/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34583754
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13071-021-05019-3
work_keys_str_mv AT bajeranna thespecificityofbabesiatickvectorinteractionsrecentadvancesandpitfallsinmolecularandfieldstudies
AT dwuznikszarekdorota thespecificityofbabesiatickvectorinteractionsrecentadvancesandpitfallsinmolecularandfieldstudies
AT bajeranna specificityofbabesiatickvectorinteractionsrecentadvancesandpitfallsinmolecularandfieldstudies
AT dwuznikszarekdorota specificityofbabesiatickvectorinteractionsrecentadvancesandpitfallsinmolecularandfieldstudies