Cargando…

Voiding function after sacrocolpopexy versus native tissue transvaginal repair for apical pelvic organ prolapse in an ERAS era: A retrospective cohort study

OBJECTIVE: The objectives of this study were to compare time to return of voiding function and associated complications in women undergoing minimally invasive sacrocolpopexy (SCP) versus transvaginal native tissue repair in patients with same-day or early discharge. METHODS: This was a retrospective...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: El Haraki, Amr Sherif, Burns, Jersey, Crafton, Christopher L., Parker-Autry, Candace, Matthews, Catherine Ann
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8480121/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34586441
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00192-021-04992-8
_version_ 1784576408254676992
author El Haraki, Amr Sherif
Burns, Jersey
Crafton, Christopher L.
Parker-Autry, Candace
Matthews, Catherine Ann
author_facet El Haraki, Amr Sherif
Burns, Jersey
Crafton, Christopher L.
Parker-Autry, Candace
Matthews, Catherine Ann
author_sort El Haraki, Amr Sherif
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: The objectives of this study were to compare time to return of voiding function and associated complications in women undergoing minimally invasive sacrocolpopexy (SCP) versus transvaginal native tissue repair in patients with same-day or early discharge. METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study conducted at a tertiary care center. The electronic medical record system was queried for women who underwent native tissue vaginal repair or SCP for apical prolapse between March and December 2020 using CPT codes for sacrocolpopexy (57425), extraperitoneal (57282), and intraperitoneal colpopexy (57283). Voiding success was our primary outcome and was defined by a postvoid residual < 150 ml. Secondary outcomes included catheter days and urinary tract infections. The total number of participants was based on a power calculation using internal institutional rates. Participants were compared based on the surgical approach. A multivariate regression analysis was performed to assess for confounding factors. RESULTS: We included 134 women: 63 SCP and 71 native tissue. The failure rate of the first postoperative voiding trial was 34 vs. 11% (odds ratio: 4.91; 95% CI 1.96–12.3, p < 0.01) in the vaginal and SCP groups, respectively. Both groups had a similar success rate of a second voiding trial (100% in SCP group vs. 95.7% in the vaginal repair group, p = 1). The total number of days (3.108 vs. 1.603 days, p < 0.01) to return of bladder function, postoperative urinary tract infections (23.9 vs. 6.35%, p < 0.01) and emergency department visits (15.5 vs. 1.59%, p < 0.01) were all higher in the vaginal repair group. CONCLUSIONS: Vaginal apical native tissue repair had a fivefold greater risk of acute postoperative urinary retention compared to sacrocolpopexy in addition to increased rates of post-operative urinary tract infection and emergency department visits for urinary tract concerns.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8480121
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Springer International Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-84801212021-09-30 Voiding function after sacrocolpopexy versus native tissue transvaginal repair for apical pelvic organ prolapse in an ERAS era: A retrospective cohort study El Haraki, Amr Sherif Burns, Jersey Crafton, Christopher L. Parker-Autry, Candace Matthews, Catherine Ann Int Urogynecol J Original Article OBJECTIVE: The objectives of this study were to compare time to return of voiding function and associated complications in women undergoing minimally invasive sacrocolpopexy (SCP) versus transvaginal native tissue repair in patients with same-day or early discharge. METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study conducted at a tertiary care center. The electronic medical record system was queried for women who underwent native tissue vaginal repair or SCP for apical prolapse between March and December 2020 using CPT codes for sacrocolpopexy (57425), extraperitoneal (57282), and intraperitoneal colpopexy (57283). Voiding success was our primary outcome and was defined by a postvoid residual < 150 ml. Secondary outcomes included catheter days and urinary tract infections. The total number of participants was based on a power calculation using internal institutional rates. Participants were compared based on the surgical approach. A multivariate regression analysis was performed to assess for confounding factors. RESULTS: We included 134 women: 63 SCP and 71 native tissue. The failure rate of the first postoperative voiding trial was 34 vs. 11% (odds ratio: 4.91; 95% CI 1.96–12.3, p < 0.01) in the vaginal and SCP groups, respectively. Both groups had a similar success rate of a second voiding trial (100% in SCP group vs. 95.7% in the vaginal repair group, p = 1). The total number of days (3.108 vs. 1.603 days, p < 0.01) to return of bladder function, postoperative urinary tract infections (23.9 vs. 6.35%, p < 0.01) and emergency department visits (15.5 vs. 1.59%, p < 0.01) were all higher in the vaginal repair group. CONCLUSIONS: Vaginal apical native tissue repair had a fivefold greater risk of acute postoperative urinary retention compared to sacrocolpopexy in addition to increased rates of post-operative urinary tract infection and emergency department visits for urinary tract concerns. Springer International Publishing 2021-09-29 2022 /pmc/articles/PMC8480121/ /pubmed/34586441 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00192-021-04992-8 Text en © The International Urogynecological Association 2021 This article is made available via the PMC Open Access Subset for unrestricted research re-use and secondary analysis in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for the duration of the World Health Organization (WHO) declaration of COVID-19 as a global pandemic.
spellingShingle Original Article
El Haraki, Amr Sherif
Burns, Jersey
Crafton, Christopher L.
Parker-Autry, Candace
Matthews, Catherine Ann
Voiding function after sacrocolpopexy versus native tissue transvaginal repair for apical pelvic organ prolapse in an ERAS era: A retrospective cohort study
title Voiding function after sacrocolpopexy versus native tissue transvaginal repair for apical pelvic organ prolapse in an ERAS era: A retrospective cohort study
title_full Voiding function after sacrocolpopexy versus native tissue transvaginal repair for apical pelvic organ prolapse in an ERAS era: A retrospective cohort study
title_fullStr Voiding function after sacrocolpopexy versus native tissue transvaginal repair for apical pelvic organ prolapse in an ERAS era: A retrospective cohort study
title_full_unstemmed Voiding function after sacrocolpopexy versus native tissue transvaginal repair for apical pelvic organ prolapse in an ERAS era: A retrospective cohort study
title_short Voiding function after sacrocolpopexy versus native tissue transvaginal repair for apical pelvic organ prolapse in an ERAS era: A retrospective cohort study
title_sort voiding function after sacrocolpopexy versus native tissue transvaginal repair for apical pelvic organ prolapse in an eras era: a retrospective cohort study
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8480121/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34586441
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00192-021-04992-8
work_keys_str_mv AT elharakiamrsherif voidingfunctionaftersacrocolpopexyversusnativetissuetransvaginalrepairforapicalpelvicorganprolapseinaneraseraaretrospectivecohortstudy
AT burnsjersey voidingfunctionaftersacrocolpopexyversusnativetissuetransvaginalrepairforapicalpelvicorganprolapseinaneraseraaretrospectivecohortstudy
AT craftonchristopherl voidingfunctionaftersacrocolpopexyversusnativetissuetransvaginalrepairforapicalpelvicorganprolapseinaneraseraaretrospectivecohortstudy
AT parkerautrycandace voidingfunctionaftersacrocolpopexyversusnativetissuetransvaginalrepairforapicalpelvicorganprolapseinaneraseraaretrospectivecohortstudy
AT matthewscatherineann voidingfunctionaftersacrocolpopexyversusnativetissuetransvaginalrepairforapicalpelvicorganprolapseinaneraseraaretrospectivecohortstudy