Cargando…
Coal seam gas industry methane emissions in the Surat Basin, Australia: comparing airborne measurements with inventories
Coal seam gas (CSG) accounts for about one-quarter of natural gas production in Australia and rapidly increasing amounts globally. This is the first study worldwide using airborne measurement techniques to quantify methane (CH(4)) emissions from a producing CSG field: the Surat Basin, Queensland, Au...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
The Royal Society
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8480229/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34565226 http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2020.0458 |
_version_ | 1784576426062643200 |
---|---|
author | Neininger, Bruno G. Kelly, Bryce F. J. Hacker, Jorg M. LU, Xinyi Schwietzke, Stefan |
author_facet | Neininger, Bruno G. Kelly, Bryce F. J. Hacker, Jorg M. LU, Xinyi Schwietzke, Stefan |
author_sort | Neininger, Bruno G. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Coal seam gas (CSG) accounts for about one-quarter of natural gas production in Australia and rapidly increasing amounts globally. This is the first study worldwide using airborne measurement techniques to quantify methane (CH(4)) emissions from a producing CSG field: the Surat Basin, Queensland, Australia. Spatially resolved CH(4) emissions were quantified from all major sources based on top-down (TD) and bottom-up (BU) approaches, the latter using Australia's UNFCCC reporting workflow. Based on our TD-validated BU inventory, CSG sources emit about 0.4% of the produced gas, comparable to onshore dry gas fields in the USA and The Netherlands, but substantially smaller than in other onshore regions, especially those where oil is co-produced (wet gas). The CSG CH(4) emission per unit of gas production determined in this study is two to three times higher than existing inventories for the region. Our results indicate that the BU emission factors for feedlots and grazing cattle need review, possibly requiring an increase for Queensland's conditions. In some subregions, the BU estimate for gathering and boosting stations is potentially too high. The results from our iterative BU inventory process, which feeds into TD data, illustrate how global characterization of CH(4) emissions could be improved by incorporating empirical TD verification surveys into national reporting. This article is part of a discussion meeting issue ‘Rising methane: is warming feeding warming? (part 1)’. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8480229 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | The Royal Society |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-84802292022-02-02 Coal seam gas industry methane emissions in the Surat Basin, Australia: comparing airborne measurements with inventories Neininger, Bruno G. Kelly, Bryce F. J. Hacker, Jorg M. LU, Xinyi Schwietzke, Stefan Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci Articles Coal seam gas (CSG) accounts for about one-quarter of natural gas production in Australia and rapidly increasing amounts globally. This is the first study worldwide using airborne measurement techniques to quantify methane (CH(4)) emissions from a producing CSG field: the Surat Basin, Queensland, Australia. Spatially resolved CH(4) emissions were quantified from all major sources based on top-down (TD) and bottom-up (BU) approaches, the latter using Australia's UNFCCC reporting workflow. Based on our TD-validated BU inventory, CSG sources emit about 0.4% of the produced gas, comparable to onshore dry gas fields in the USA and The Netherlands, but substantially smaller than in other onshore regions, especially those where oil is co-produced (wet gas). The CSG CH(4) emission per unit of gas production determined in this study is two to three times higher than existing inventories for the region. Our results indicate that the BU emission factors for feedlots and grazing cattle need review, possibly requiring an increase for Queensland's conditions. In some subregions, the BU estimate for gathering and boosting stations is potentially too high. The results from our iterative BU inventory process, which feeds into TD data, illustrate how global characterization of CH(4) emissions could be improved by incorporating empirical TD verification surveys into national reporting. This article is part of a discussion meeting issue ‘Rising methane: is warming feeding warming? (part 1)’. The Royal Society 2021-11-15 2021-09-27 /pmc/articles/PMC8480229/ /pubmed/34565226 http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2020.0458 Text en © 2021 The Authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Published by the Royal Society under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Articles Neininger, Bruno G. Kelly, Bryce F. J. Hacker, Jorg M. LU, Xinyi Schwietzke, Stefan Coal seam gas industry methane emissions in the Surat Basin, Australia: comparing airborne measurements with inventories |
title | Coal seam gas industry methane emissions in the Surat Basin, Australia: comparing airborne measurements with inventories |
title_full | Coal seam gas industry methane emissions in the Surat Basin, Australia: comparing airborne measurements with inventories |
title_fullStr | Coal seam gas industry methane emissions in the Surat Basin, Australia: comparing airborne measurements with inventories |
title_full_unstemmed | Coal seam gas industry methane emissions in the Surat Basin, Australia: comparing airborne measurements with inventories |
title_short | Coal seam gas industry methane emissions in the Surat Basin, Australia: comparing airborne measurements with inventories |
title_sort | coal seam gas industry methane emissions in the surat basin, australia: comparing airborne measurements with inventories |
topic | Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8480229/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34565226 http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2020.0458 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT neiningerbrunog coalseamgasindustrymethaneemissionsinthesuratbasinaustraliacomparingairbornemeasurementswithinventories AT kellybrycefj coalseamgasindustrymethaneemissionsinthesuratbasinaustraliacomparingairbornemeasurementswithinventories AT hackerjorgm coalseamgasindustrymethaneemissionsinthesuratbasinaustraliacomparingairbornemeasurementswithinventories AT luxinyi coalseamgasindustrymethaneemissionsinthesuratbasinaustraliacomparingairbornemeasurementswithinventories AT schwietzkestefan coalseamgasindustrymethaneemissionsinthesuratbasinaustraliacomparingairbornemeasurementswithinventories |