Cargando…

Coal seam gas industry methane emissions in the Surat Basin, Australia: comparing airborne measurements with inventories

Coal seam gas (CSG) accounts for about one-quarter of natural gas production in Australia and rapidly increasing amounts globally. This is the first study worldwide using airborne measurement techniques to quantify methane (CH(4)) emissions from a producing CSG field: the Surat Basin, Queensland, Au...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Neininger, Bruno G., Kelly, Bryce F. J., Hacker, Jorg M., LU, Xinyi, Schwietzke, Stefan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Royal Society 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8480229/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34565226
http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2020.0458
_version_ 1784576426062643200
author Neininger, Bruno G.
Kelly, Bryce F. J.
Hacker, Jorg M.
LU, Xinyi
Schwietzke, Stefan
author_facet Neininger, Bruno G.
Kelly, Bryce F. J.
Hacker, Jorg M.
LU, Xinyi
Schwietzke, Stefan
author_sort Neininger, Bruno G.
collection PubMed
description Coal seam gas (CSG) accounts for about one-quarter of natural gas production in Australia and rapidly increasing amounts globally. This is the first study worldwide using airborne measurement techniques to quantify methane (CH(4)) emissions from a producing CSG field: the Surat Basin, Queensland, Australia. Spatially resolved CH(4) emissions were quantified from all major sources based on top-down (TD) and bottom-up (BU) approaches, the latter using Australia's UNFCCC reporting workflow. Based on our TD-validated BU inventory, CSG sources emit about 0.4% of the produced gas, comparable to onshore dry gas fields in the USA and The Netherlands, but substantially smaller than in other onshore regions, especially those where oil is co-produced (wet gas). The CSG CH(4) emission per unit of gas production determined in this study is two to three times higher than existing inventories for the region. Our results indicate that the BU emission factors for feedlots and grazing cattle need review, possibly requiring an increase for Queensland's conditions. In some subregions, the BU estimate for gathering and boosting stations is potentially too high. The results from our iterative BU inventory process, which feeds into TD data, illustrate how global characterization of CH(4) emissions could be improved by incorporating empirical TD verification surveys into national reporting. This article is part of a discussion meeting issue ‘Rising methane: is warming feeding warming? (part 1)’.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8480229
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher The Royal Society
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-84802292022-02-02 Coal seam gas industry methane emissions in the Surat Basin, Australia: comparing airborne measurements with inventories Neininger, Bruno G. Kelly, Bryce F. J. Hacker, Jorg M. LU, Xinyi Schwietzke, Stefan Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci Articles Coal seam gas (CSG) accounts for about one-quarter of natural gas production in Australia and rapidly increasing amounts globally. This is the first study worldwide using airborne measurement techniques to quantify methane (CH(4)) emissions from a producing CSG field: the Surat Basin, Queensland, Australia. Spatially resolved CH(4) emissions were quantified from all major sources based on top-down (TD) and bottom-up (BU) approaches, the latter using Australia's UNFCCC reporting workflow. Based on our TD-validated BU inventory, CSG sources emit about 0.4% of the produced gas, comparable to onshore dry gas fields in the USA and The Netherlands, but substantially smaller than in other onshore regions, especially those where oil is co-produced (wet gas). The CSG CH(4) emission per unit of gas production determined in this study is two to three times higher than existing inventories for the region. Our results indicate that the BU emission factors for feedlots and grazing cattle need review, possibly requiring an increase for Queensland's conditions. In some subregions, the BU estimate for gathering and boosting stations is potentially too high. The results from our iterative BU inventory process, which feeds into TD data, illustrate how global characterization of CH(4) emissions could be improved by incorporating empirical TD verification surveys into national reporting. This article is part of a discussion meeting issue ‘Rising methane: is warming feeding warming? (part 1)’. The Royal Society 2021-11-15 2021-09-27 /pmc/articles/PMC8480229/ /pubmed/34565226 http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2020.0458 Text en © 2021 The Authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Published by the Royal Society under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Articles
Neininger, Bruno G.
Kelly, Bryce F. J.
Hacker, Jorg M.
LU, Xinyi
Schwietzke, Stefan
Coal seam gas industry methane emissions in the Surat Basin, Australia: comparing airborne measurements with inventories
title Coal seam gas industry methane emissions in the Surat Basin, Australia: comparing airborne measurements with inventories
title_full Coal seam gas industry methane emissions in the Surat Basin, Australia: comparing airborne measurements with inventories
title_fullStr Coal seam gas industry methane emissions in the Surat Basin, Australia: comparing airborne measurements with inventories
title_full_unstemmed Coal seam gas industry methane emissions in the Surat Basin, Australia: comparing airborne measurements with inventories
title_short Coal seam gas industry methane emissions in the Surat Basin, Australia: comparing airborne measurements with inventories
title_sort coal seam gas industry methane emissions in the surat basin, australia: comparing airborne measurements with inventories
topic Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8480229/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34565226
http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2020.0458
work_keys_str_mv AT neiningerbrunog coalseamgasindustrymethaneemissionsinthesuratbasinaustraliacomparingairbornemeasurementswithinventories
AT kellybrycefj coalseamgasindustrymethaneemissionsinthesuratbasinaustraliacomparingairbornemeasurementswithinventories
AT hackerjorgm coalseamgasindustrymethaneemissionsinthesuratbasinaustraliacomparingairbornemeasurementswithinventories
AT luxinyi coalseamgasindustrymethaneemissionsinthesuratbasinaustraliacomparingairbornemeasurementswithinventories
AT schwietzkestefan coalseamgasindustrymethaneemissionsinthesuratbasinaustraliacomparingairbornemeasurementswithinventories