Cargando…

Safety and Efficacy of Achilles Repair Using the Mini-Open Approach in Supine Versus Prone Position: A Retrospective Study

Purpose Surgical repair of the Achilles tendon is a common procedure in cases of acute rupture. Open Achilles tendon surgery with a traditional extensile approach is most often performed in the prone position, but this can lead to numerous complications. The mini-open approach for repair in the supi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: McKissack, Haley, McLynn, Ryan, Pitts, Charles, Alexander, Bradley, Jones, James, Andrews, Nicholas A, Littlefield, Zachary L, Shah, Ashish
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Cureus 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8480360/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34646620
http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.17564
_version_ 1784576451436085248
author McKissack, Haley
McLynn, Ryan
Pitts, Charles
Alexander, Bradley
Jones, James
Andrews, Nicholas A
Littlefield, Zachary L
Shah, Ashish
author_facet McKissack, Haley
McLynn, Ryan
Pitts, Charles
Alexander, Bradley
Jones, James
Andrews, Nicholas A
Littlefield, Zachary L
Shah, Ashish
author_sort McKissack, Haley
collection PubMed
description Purpose Surgical repair of the Achilles tendon is a common procedure in cases of acute rupture. Open Achilles tendon surgery with a traditional extensile approach is most often performed in the prone position, but this can lead to numerous complications. The mini-open approach for repair in the supine position may avoid the risks of the prone position. The purpose of this study is to compare perioperative outcomes and differences in cost between patients undergoing acute Achilles rupture repair with mini-open approach, incision of approximately 3 cm, in the supine position versus traditional approach in the prone position. Methods Patients who underwent surgical repair of acute Achilles rupture at a single institution were retrospectively identified using Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) code 27650. Complication rates and the total cost charged to the insurance companies of both the supine and prone groups were calculated. Results A total of 80 patients were included for analysis, 26 supine and 54 prone. The difference in average total time in the operating room was statistically significant. The prone position took approximately 15% more time (118.7 minutes) compared to the supine position (100 minutes) (p = 0.001). While not statistically significant, the total cost for the supine group ($19,889) was less than the for the prone group ($21,722) (p = 0.153) Average postoperative pain score, infection rate, dehiscence rate, sepsis rate, and deep vein thrombosis (DVT) rate were also similar between the two groups. No patient in either group experienced re-rupture of the Achilles tendon within the first year of primary repair. Conclusion The mini-open approach in the supine position may be advantageous in the repair of acute Achilles rupture in that it reduces total time in the operating room and total cost while maintaining positive patient outcomes. Prospective clinical studies are warranted to validate these assessments.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8480360
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Cureus
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-84803602021-10-12 Safety and Efficacy of Achilles Repair Using the Mini-Open Approach in Supine Versus Prone Position: A Retrospective Study McKissack, Haley McLynn, Ryan Pitts, Charles Alexander, Bradley Jones, James Andrews, Nicholas A Littlefield, Zachary L Shah, Ashish Cureus Orthopedics Purpose Surgical repair of the Achilles tendon is a common procedure in cases of acute rupture. Open Achilles tendon surgery with a traditional extensile approach is most often performed in the prone position, but this can lead to numerous complications. The mini-open approach for repair in the supine position may avoid the risks of the prone position. The purpose of this study is to compare perioperative outcomes and differences in cost between patients undergoing acute Achilles rupture repair with mini-open approach, incision of approximately 3 cm, in the supine position versus traditional approach in the prone position. Methods Patients who underwent surgical repair of acute Achilles rupture at a single institution were retrospectively identified using Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) code 27650. Complication rates and the total cost charged to the insurance companies of both the supine and prone groups were calculated. Results A total of 80 patients were included for analysis, 26 supine and 54 prone. The difference in average total time in the operating room was statistically significant. The prone position took approximately 15% more time (118.7 minutes) compared to the supine position (100 minutes) (p = 0.001). While not statistically significant, the total cost for the supine group ($19,889) was less than the for the prone group ($21,722) (p = 0.153) Average postoperative pain score, infection rate, dehiscence rate, sepsis rate, and deep vein thrombosis (DVT) rate were also similar between the two groups. No patient in either group experienced re-rupture of the Achilles tendon within the first year of primary repair. Conclusion The mini-open approach in the supine position may be advantageous in the repair of acute Achilles rupture in that it reduces total time in the operating room and total cost while maintaining positive patient outcomes. Prospective clinical studies are warranted to validate these assessments. Cureus 2021-08-30 /pmc/articles/PMC8480360/ /pubmed/34646620 http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.17564 Text en Copyright © 2021, McKissack et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Orthopedics
McKissack, Haley
McLynn, Ryan
Pitts, Charles
Alexander, Bradley
Jones, James
Andrews, Nicholas A
Littlefield, Zachary L
Shah, Ashish
Safety and Efficacy of Achilles Repair Using the Mini-Open Approach in Supine Versus Prone Position: A Retrospective Study
title Safety and Efficacy of Achilles Repair Using the Mini-Open Approach in Supine Versus Prone Position: A Retrospective Study
title_full Safety and Efficacy of Achilles Repair Using the Mini-Open Approach in Supine Versus Prone Position: A Retrospective Study
title_fullStr Safety and Efficacy of Achilles Repair Using the Mini-Open Approach in Supine Versus Prone Position: A Retrospective Study
title_full_unstemmed Safety and Efficacy of Achilles Repair Using the Mini-Open Approach in Supine Versus Prone Position: A Retrospective Study
title_short Safety and Efficacy of Achilles Repair Using the Mini-Open Approach in Supine Versus Prone Position: A Retrospective Study
title_sort safety and efficacy of achilles repair using the mini-open approach in supine versus prone position: a retrospective study
topic Orthopedics
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8480360/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34646620
http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.17564
work_keys_str_mv AT mckissackhaley safetyandefficacyofachillesrepairusingtheminiopenapproachinsupineversuspronepositionaretrospectivestudy
AT mclynnryan safetyandefficacyofachillesrepairusingtheminiopenapproachinsupineversuspronepositionaretrospectivestudy
AT pittscharles safetyandefficacyofachillesrepairusingtheminiopenapproachinsupineversuspronepositionaretrospectivestudy
AT alexanderbradley safetyandefficacyofachillesrepairusingtheminiopenapproachinsupineversuspronepositionaretrospectivestudy
AT jonesjames safetyandefficacyofachillesrepairusingtheminiopenapproachinsupineversuspronepositionaretrospectivestudy
AT andrewsnicholasa safetyandefficacyofachillesrepairusingtheminiopenapproachinsupineversuspronepositionaretrospectivestudy
AT littlefieldzacharyl safetyandefficacyofachillesrepairusingtheminiopenapproachinsupineversuspronepositionaretrospectivestudy
AT shahashish safetyandefficacyofachillesrepairusingtheminiopenapproachinsupineversuspronepositionaretrospectivestudy