Cargando…

Role of fibrinogen–erythrocyte and erythrocyte–erythrocyte adhesion on cardiovascular pathologies

Cardiovascular pathologies are the major cause of death worldwide. Erythrocyte aggregation is an indicator of cardiovascular risk, which is influenced by high plasma fibrinogen levels. Our main goals were to understand how fibrinogen–erythrocyte binding influences erythrocyte aggregation and how it...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Carvalho, Filomena A., Guedes, Ana Filipa, Sargento, Luís, Nogueira, J. Braz, Lousada, Nuno, Moreira, Carlos, Santos, Nuno C.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Taylor & Francis 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8480739/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/07853890.2021.1896875
_version_ 1784576523996495872
author Carvalho, Filomena A.
Guedes, Ana Filipa
Sargento, Luís
Nogueira, J. Braz
Lousada, Nuno
Moreira, Carlos
Santos, Nuno C.
author_facet Carvalho, Filomena A.
Guedes, Ana Filipa
Sargento, Luís
Nogueira, J. Braz
Lousada, Nuno
Moreira, Carlos
Santos, Nuno C.
author_sort Carvalho, Filomena A.
collection PubMed
description Cardiovascular pathologies are the major cause of death worldwide. Erythrocyte aggregation is an indicator of cardiovascular risk, which is influenced by high plasma fibrinogen levels. Our main goals were to understand how fibrinogen–erythrocyte binding influences erythrocyte aggregation and how it constitutes a cardiovascular risk factor in essential arterial hypertension (EAH) and chronic heart failure (CHF). Differences on cell stiffness, protein-cell interaction and cell–cell adhesion forces were evaluated by AFM-based force spectroscopy with cells from 31 EAH patients, 30 CHF patients and 15 healthy blood donors. The main procedures used were previously described by us [1–3]. Results were correlated with patients’ clinical profiles. From cell–cell adhesion studies, we concluded that, upon increasing fibrinogen concentration (from 0 to 1 mg/mL), there was an increase in the work and force necessary for erythrocyte–erythrocyte detachment on EAH patients and healthy donors. Nevertheless, higher values from both parameters were obtained for EAH patients, when comparing to healthy donors, at each fibrinogen concentration [4]. Fibrinogen-erythrocyte (un)binding forces were higher in EAH and in CHF patients, when compared with the control group, despite a lower binding frequency [5,6]. Ischaemic CHF patients showed increased binding forces compared to non-ischaemic patients. A 12-month clinical follow-up shows that CHF patients with higher fibrinogen–erythrocyte binding forces, probed by AFM at the beginning of the assessment, had a significantly higher probability of being hospitalised due to cardiovascular complications, pointing out the value of AFM for clinical prognosis [5]. Erythrocyte stiffness studies revealed differences between patients and healthy donors, in terms of erythrocyte elasticity (Young’s modulus) and AFM tip penetration depth into the cells [5,6]. Erythrocytes from non-ischaemic CHF patients presented a higher average stiffness than those from the other groups (ischaemic CHF and control). Nevertheless, a significantly higher cell penetration depth at the same applied force was observed for ischaemic CHF patients [5]. In conclusion, fibrinogen promotes erythrocyte adhesion, leading to its aggregation, probably by transient simultaneous binding of the protein to two cells, bridging them. Our results may be relevant for potential future drug interventions to reduce aggregation and enhance microcirculatory flow conditions in cardiovascular patients.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8480739
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Taylor & Francis
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-84807392022-03-03 Role of fibrinogen–erythrocyte and erythrocyte–erythrocyte adhesion on cardiovascular pathologies Carvalho, Filomena A. Guedes, Ana Filipa Sargento, Luís Nogueira, J. Braz Lousada, Nuno Moreira, Carlos Santos, Nuno C. Ann Med Abstract K10 Cardiovascular pathologies are the major cause of death worldwide. Erythrocyte aggregation is an indicator of cardiovascular risk, which is influenced by high plasma fibrinogen levels. Our main goals were to understand how fibrinogen–erythrocyte binding influences erythrocyte aggregation and how it constitutes a cardiovascular risk factor in essential arterial hypertension (EAH) and chronic heart failure (CHF). Differences on cell stiffness, protein-cell interaction and cell–cell adhesion forces were evaluated by AFM-based force spectroscopy with cells from 31 EAH patients, 30 CHF patients and 15 healthy blood donors. The main procedures used were previously described by us [1–3]. Results were correlated with patients’ clinical profiles. From cell–cell adhesion studies, we concluded that, upon increasing fibrinogen concentration (from 0 to 1 mg/mL), there was an increase in the work and force necessary for erythrocyte–erythrocyte detachment on EAH patients and healthy donors. Nevertheless, higher values from both parameters were obtained for EAH patients, when comparing to healthy donors, at each fibrinogen concentration [4]. Fibrinogen-erythrocyte (un)binding forces were higher in EAH and in CHF patients, when compared with the control group, despite a lower binding frequency [5,6]. Ischaemic CHF patients showed increased binding forces compared to non-ischaemic patients. A 12-month clinical follow-up shows that CHF patients with higher fibrinogen–erythrocyte binding forces, probed by AFM at the beginning of the assessment, had a significantly higher probability of being hospitalised due to cardiovascular complications, pointing out the value of AFM for clinical prognosis [5]. Erythrocyte stiffness studies revealed differences between patients and healthy donors, in terms of erythrocyte elasticity (Young’s modulus) and AFM tip penetration depth into the cells [5,6]. Erythrocytes from non-ischaemic CHF patients presented a higher average stiffness than those from the other groups (ischaemic CHF and control). Nevertheless, a significantly higher cell penetration depth at the same applied force was observed for ischaemic CHF patients [5]. In conclusion, fibrinogen promotes erythrocyte adhesion, leading to its aggregation, probably by transient simultaneous binding of the protein to two cells, bridging them. Our results may be relevant for potential future drug interventions to reduce aggregation and enhance microcirculatory flow conditions in cardiovascular patients. Taylor & Francis 2021-09-28 /pmc/articles/PMC8480739/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/07853890.2021.1896875 Text en © 2021 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Abstract K10
Carvalho, Filomena A.
Guedes, Ana Filipa
Sargento, Luís
Nogueira, J. Braz
Lousada, Nuno
Moreira, Carlos
Santos, Nuno C.
Role of fibrinogen–erythrocyte and erythrocyte–erythrocyte adhesion on cardiovascular pathologies
title Role of fibrinogen–erythrocyte and erythrocyte–erythrocyte adhesion on cardiovascular pathologies
title_full Role of fibrinogen–erythrocyte and erythrocyte–erythrocyte adhesion on cardiovascular pathologies
title_fullStr Role of fibrinogen–erythrocyte and erythrocyte–erythrocyte adhesion on cardiovascular pathologies
title_full_unstemmed Role of fibrinogen–erythrocyte and erythrocyte–erythrocyte adhesion on cardiovascular pathologies
title_short Role of fibrinogen–erythrocyte and erythrocyte–erythrocyte adhesion on cardiovascular pathologies
title_sort role of fibrinogen–erythrocyte and erythrocyte–erythrocyte adhesion on cardiovascular pathologies
topic Abstract K10
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8480739/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/07853890.2021.1896875
work_keys_str_mv AT carvalhofilomenaa roleoffibrinogenerythrocyteanderythrocyteerythrocyteadhesiononcardiovascularpathologies
AT guedesanafilipa roleoffibrinogenerythrocyteanderythrocyteerythrocyteadhesiononcardiovascularpathologies
AT sargentoluis roleoffibrinogenerythrocyteanderythrocyteerythrocyteadhesiononcardiovascularpathologies
AT nogueirajbraz roleoffibrinogenerythrocyteanderythrocyteerythrocyteadhesiononcardiovascularpathologies
AT lousadanuno roleoffibrinogenerythrocyteanderythrocyteerythrocyteadhesiononcardiovascularpathologies
AT moreiracarlos roleoffibrinogenerythrocyteanderythrocyteerythrocyteadhesiononcardiovascularpathologies
AT santosnunoc roleoffibrinogenerythrocyteanderythrocyteerythrocyteadhesiononcardiovascularpathologies