Cargando…

An examination of physical violence against women and its justification in development settings in Uganda

This paper uses data from a community cross-sectional survey to examine the factors that are associated with justification of physical violence against women. Results indicate that respondents who were married at the time of the survey were less likely (OR = 0.29; CI = 0.17–0.52) to agree that it is...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bukuluki, Paul, Kisaakye, Peter, Wandiembe, Symon Peter, Musuya, Tina, Letiyo, Evelyn, Bazira, Dan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8480831/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34587182
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0255281
_version_ 1784576548500668416
author Bukuluki, Paul
Kisaakye, Peter
Wandiembe, Symon Peter
Musuya, Tina
Letiyo, Evelyn
Bazira, Dan
author_facet Bukuluki, Paul
Kisaakye, Peter
Wandiembe, Symon Peter
Musuya, Tina
Letiyo, Evelyn
Bazira, Dan
author_sort Bukuluki, Paul
collection PubMed
description This paper uses data from a community cross-sectional survey to examine the factors that are associated with justification of physical violence against women. Results indicate that respondents who were married at the time of the survey were less likely (OR = 0.29; CI = 0.17–0.52) to agree that it is justified for a man to physically assault his partner that their counterparts who were single. The likelihood to justify physical violence was less likely to happen among respondents with primary education (OR = 0.49; CI = 0.39–0.62), secondary education (OR = 0.40; CI = 0.31–0.53) and vocation or tertiary education (OR = 0.28; CI = 0.19–0.41) than among respondents with no education. Protestants were less likely (OR = 0.77; CI = 0.64–0.94) to justify physical violence than the Catholics. Respondents who were not formally employed were more likely (OR = 1.66; CI = 1.32–2.08) to justify physical violence than their counterparts who were in formal employment in the last three months preceding the survey. Respondents who agreed that it is okay for a man to control his partner’s movements (OR = 1.27; CI = 1.04–1.55), it is okay for a man to have sex with his wife anytime (OR = 2.28; CI = 1.87–2.78), alcohol is the main reason for violence against women (OR = 1.67; CI = 1.33–2.10), men need sex more than women (OR = 1.57; CI = 1.23–1.99) and women know where to obtain support in case of violence (OR = 1.42; CI = 1.00–2.02) were more likely to justify physical violence than respondents who disagreed. The likelihood to justify physical violence was less among respondents who agreed that: violence is not the only way to deal with disagreements (OR = 0.54; CI = 0.33–0.86), it is possible for men to stop violence (OR = 0.62; CI = 0.47–0.82) and it is acceptable for a woman to ask her partner to use a condom (OR = 0.61; CI = 0.51–0.73) than their counterparts who disagreed. There is need to increase investment in social norms change programmes in order to strengthen contestation of tolerance of physical violence among men and women in Uganda.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8480831
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-84808312021-09-30 An examination of physical violence against women and its justification in development settings in Uganda Bukuluki, Paul Kisaakye, Peter Wandiembe, Symon Peter Musuya, Tina Letiyo, Evelyn Bazira, Dan PLoS One Research Article This paper uses data from a community cross-sectional survey to examine the factors that are associated with justification of physical violence against women. Results indicate that respondents who were married at the time of the survey were less likely (OR = 0.29; CI = 0.17–0.52) to agree that it is justified for a man to physically assault his partner that their counterparts who were single. The likelihood to justify physical violence was less likely to happen among respondents with primary education (OR = 0.49; CI = 0.39–0.62), secondary education (OR = 0.40; CI = 0.31–0.53) and vocation or tertiary education (OR = 0.28; CI = 0.19–0.41) than among respondents with no education. Protestants were less likely (OR = 0.77; CI = 0.64–0.94) to justify physical violence than the Catholics. Respondents who were not formally employed were more likely (OR = 1.66; CI = 1.32–2.08) to justify physical violence than their counterparts who were in formal employment in the last three months preceding the survey. Respondents who agreed that it is okay for a man to control his partner’s movements (OR = 1.27; CI = 1.04–1.55), it is okay for a man to have sex with his wife anytime (OR = 2.28; CI = 1.87–2.78), alcohol is the main reason for violence against women (OR = 1.67; CI = 1.33–2.10), men need sex more than women (OR = 1.57; CI = 1.23–1.99) and women know where to obtain support in case of violence (OR = 1.42; CI = 1.00–2.02) were more likely to justify physical violence than respondents who disagreed. The likelihood to justify physical violence was less among respondents who agreed that: violence is not the only way to deal with disagreements (OR = 0.54; CI = 0.33–0.86), it is possible for men to stop violence (OR = 0.62; CI = 0.47–0.82) and it is acceptable for a woman to ask her partner to use a condom (OR = 0.61; CI = 0.51–0.73) than their counterparts who disagreed. There is need to increase investment in social norms change programmes in order to strengthen contestation of tolerance of physical violence among men and women in Uganda. Public Library of Science 2021-09-29 /pmc/articles/PMC8480831/ /pubmed/34587182 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0255281 Text en © 2021 Bukuluki et al https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Bukuluki, Paul
Kisaakye, Peter
Wandiembe, Symon Peter
Musuya, Tina
Letiyo, Evelyn
Bazira, Dan
An examination of physical violence against women and its justification in development settings in Uganda
title An examination of physical violence against women and its justification in development settings in Uganda
title_full An examination of physical violence against women and its justification in development settings in Uganda
title_fullStr An examination of physical violence against women and its justification in development settings in Uganda
title_full_unstemmed An examination of physical violence against women and its justification in development settings in Uganda
title_short An examination of physical violence against women and its justification in development settings in Uganda
title_sort examination of physical violence against women and its justification in development settings in uganda
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8480831/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34587182
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0255281
work_keys_str_mv AT bukulukipaul anexaminationofphysicalviolenceagainstwomenanditsjustificationindevelopmentsettingsinuganda
AT kisaakyepeter anexaminationofphysicalviolenceagainstwomenanditsjustificationindevelopmentsettingsinuganda
AT wandiembesymonpeter anexaminationofphysicalviolenceagainstwomenanditsjustificationindevelopmentsettingsinuganda
AT musuyatina anexaminationofphysicalviolenceagainstwomenanditsjustificationindevelopmentsettingsinuganda
AT letiyoevelyn anexaminationofphysicalviolenceagainstwomenanditsjustificationindevelopmentsettingsinuganda
AT baziradan anexaminationofphysicalviolenceagainstwomenanditsjustificationindevelopmentsettingsinuganda
AT bukulukipaul examinationofphysicalviolenceagainstwomenanditsjustificationindevelopmentsettingsinuganda
AT kisaakyepeter examinationofphysicalviolenceagainstwomenanditsjustificationindevelopmentsettingsinuganda
AT wandiembesymonpeter examinationofphysicalviolenceagainstwomenanditsjustificationindevelopmentsettingsinuganda
AT musuyatina examinationofphysicalviolenceagainstwomenanditsjustificationindevelopmentsettingsinuganda
AT letiyoevelyn examinationofphysicalviolenceagainstwomenanditsjustificationindevelopmentsettingsinuganda
AT baziradan examinationofphysicalviolenceagainstwomenanditsjustificationindevelopmentsettingsinuganda