Cargando…
A scoping review of patient engagement activities during COVID-19: More consultation, less partnership
BACKGROUND: The COVID-19 pandemic has had a devastating impact on healthcare systems and care delivery, changing the context for patient and family engagement activities. Given the critical contribution of such activities in achieving health system quality goals, we undertook to address the question...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8480845/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34587175 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0257880 |
_version_ | 1784576552545026048 |
---|---|
author | Cadel, Lauren Marcinow, Michelle Sandercock, Jane Dowedoff, Penny Guilcher, Sara J. T. Maybee, Alies Law, Susan Kuluski, Kerry |
author_facet | Cadel, Lauren Marcinow, Michelle Sandercock, Jane Dowedoff, Penny Guilcher, Sara J. T. Maybee, Alies Law, Susan Kuluski, Kerry |
author_sort | Cadel, Lauren |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The COVID-19 pandemic has had a devastating impact on healthcare systems and care delivery, changing the context for patient and family engagement activities. Given the critical contribution of such activities in achieving health system quality goals, we undertook to address the question: What is known about work that has been done on patient engagement activities during the pandemic? OBJECTIVE: To examine peer-reviewed and grey literature to identify the range of patient engagement activities, broadly defined (inclusive of engagement to support clinical care to partnerships in decision-making), occurring within health systems internationally during the first six months of the COVID-19 pandemic, as well as key barriers and facilitators for sustaining patient engagement activities during the pandemic. METHODS: The following databases were searched: Medline, Embase and LitCOVID; a search for grey literature focused on the websites of professional organizations. Articles were required to be specific to COVID-19, describe patient engagement activities, involve a healthcare organization and be published from March 2020 to September 2020. Data were extracted and managed using Microsoft Excel. A content analysis of findings was conducted. RESULTS: Twenty-nine articles were included. Few examples of more genuine partnership with patients were identified (such as co-design and organizational level decision making); most activities related to clinical level interactions (e.g. virtual consultations, remote appointments, family visits using technology and community outreach). Technology was leveraged in almost all reported studies to interact or connect with patients and families. Five main descriptive categories were identified: (1) Engagement through Virtual Care; (2) Engagement through Other Technology; (3) Engagement for Service Improvements/ Recommendations; (4) Factors Impacting Patient Engagement; and (5) Lessons Learned though Patient Engagement. CONCLUSIONS: Evidence of how healthcare systems and organizations stayed connected to patients and families during the pandemic was identified; the majority of activities involved direct care consultations via technology. Since this review was conducted over the first six months of the pandemic, more work is needed to unpack the spectrum of patient engagement activities, including how they may evolve over time and to explore the barriers and facilitators for sustaining activities during major disruptions like pandemics. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8480845 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-84808452021-09-30 A scoping review of patient engagement activities during COVID-19: More consultation, less partnership Cadel, Lauren Marcinow, Michelle Sandercock, Jane Dowedoff, Penny Guilcher, Sara J. T. Maybee, Alies Law, Susan Kuluski, Kerry PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: The COVID-19 pandemic has had a devastating impact on healthcare systems and care delivery, changing the context for patient and family engagement activities. Given the critical contribution of such activities in achieving health system quality goals, we undertook to address the question: What is known about work that has been done on patient engagement activities during the pandemic? OBJECTIVE: To examine peer-reviewed and grey literature to identify the range of patient engagement activities, broadly defined (inclusive of engagement to support clinical care to partnerships in decision-making), occurring within health systems internationally during the first six months of the COVID-19 pandemic, as well as key barriers and facilitators for sustaining patient engagement activities during the pandemic. METHODS: The following databases were searched: Medline, Embase and LitCOVID; a search for grey literature focused on the websites of professional organizations. Articles were required to be specific to COVID-19, describe patient engagement activities, involve a healthcare organization and be published from March 2020 to September 2020. Data were extracted and managed using Microsoft Excel. A content analysis of findings was conducted. RESULTS: Twenty-nine articles were included. Few examples of more genuine partnership with patients were identified (such as co-design and organizational level decision making); most activities related to clinical level interactions (e.g. virtual consultations, remote appointments, family visits using technology and community outreach). Technology was leveraged in almost all reported studies to interact or connect with patients and families. Five main descriptive categories were identified: (1) Engagement through Virtual Care; (2) Engagement through Other Technology; (3) Engagement for Service Improvements/ Recommendations; (4) Factors Impacting Patient Engagement; and (5) Lessons Learned though Patient Engagement. CONCLUSIONS: Evidence of how healthcare systems and organizations stayed connected to patients and families during the pandemic was identified; the majority of activities involved direct care consultations via technology. Since this review was conducted over the first six months of the pandemic, more work is needed to unpack the spectrum of patient engagement activities, including how they may evolve over time and to explore the barriers and facilitators for sustaining activities during major disruptions like pandemics. Public Library of Science 2021-09-29 /pmc/articles/PMC8480845/ /pubmed/34587175 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0257880 Text en © 2021 Cadel et al https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Cadel, Lauren Marcinow, Michelle Sandercock, Jane Dowedoff, Penny Guilcher, Sara J. T. Maybee, Alies Law, Susan Kuluski, Kerry A scoping review of patient engagement activities during COVID-19: More consultation, less partnership |
title | A scoping review of patient engagement activities during COVID-19: More consultation, less partnership |
title_full | A scoping review of patient engagement activities during COVID-19: More consultation, less partnership |
title_fullStr | A scoping review of patient engagement activities during COVID-19: More consultation, less partnership |
title_full_unstemmed | A scoping review of patient engagement activities during COVID-19: More consultation, less partnership |
title_short | A scoping review of patient engagement activities during COVID-19: More consultation, less partnership |
title_sort | scoping review of patient engagement activities during covid-19: more consultation, less partnership |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8480845/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34587175 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0257880 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT cadellauren ascopingreviewofpatientengagementactivitiesduringcovid19moreconsultationlesspartnership AT marcinowmichelle ascopingreviewofpatientengagementactivitiesduringcovid19moreconsultationlesspartnership AT sandercockjane ascopingreviewofpatientengagementactivitiesduringcovid19moreconsultationlesspartnership AT dowedoffpenny ascopingreviewofpatientengagementactivitiesduringcovid19moreconsultationlesspartnership AT guilchersarajt ascopingreviewofpatientengagementactivitiesduringcovid19moreconsultationlesspartnership AT maybeealies ascopingreviewofpatientengagementactivitiesduringcovid19moreconsultationlesspartnership AT lawsusan ascopingreviewofpatientengagementactivitiesduringcovid19moreconsultationlesspartnership AT kuluskikerry ascopingreviewofpatientengagementactivitiesduringcovid19moreconsultationlesspartnership AT cadellauren scopingreviewofpatientengagementactivitiesduringcovid19moreconsultationlesspartnership AT marcinowmichelle scopingreviewofpatientengagementactivitiesduringcovid19moreconsultationlesspartnership AT sandercockjane scopingreviewofpatientengagementactivitiesduringcovid19moreconsultationlesspartnership AT dowedoffpenny scopingreviewofpatientengagementactivitiesduringcovid19moreconsultationlesspartnership AT guilchersarajt scopingreviewofpatientengagementactivitiesduringcovid19moreconsultationlesspartnership AT maybeealies scopingreviewofpatientengagementactivitiesduringcovid19moreconsultationlesspartnership AT lawsusan scopingreviewofpatientengagementactivitiesduringcovid19moreconsultationlesspartnership AT kuluskikerry scopingreviewofpatientengagementactivitiesduringcovid19moreconsultationlesspartnership |