Cargando…

Evidence-based vs. social media based high-intensity interval training protocols: Physiological and perceptual responses

OBJECTIVE: High intensity interval training (HIIT) is a time-efficient exercise modality to improve cardiorespiratory fitness, and has recently been popularised by social media influencers. However, little is known regarding acute physiological and perceptual responses to these online protocols comp...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hesketh, Katie L., Church, Hannah, Kinnafick, Florence, Shepherd, Sam O., Wagenmakers, Anton J. M., Cocks, Matthew, Strauss, Juliette A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8480907/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34587217
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0257685
_version_ 1784576568359649280
author Hesketh, Katie L.
Church, Hannah
Kinnafick, Florence
Shepherd, Sam O.
Wagenmakers, Anton J. M.
Cocks, Matthew
Strauss, Juliette A.
author_facet Hesketh, Katie L.
Church, Hannah
Kinnafick, Florence
Shepherd, Sam O.
Wagenmakers, Anton J. M.
Cocks, Matthew
Strauss, Juliette A.
author_sort Hesketh, Katie L.
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: High intensity interval training (HIIT) is a time-efficient exercise modality to improve cardiorespiratory fitness, and has recently been popularised by social media influencers. However, little is known regarding acute physiological and perceptual responses to these online protocols compared to HIIT protocols used within research. The aim was to investigate acute physiological, perceptual and motivational responses to two HIIT protocols popular on social media, and compare these to two evidence-based protocols. METHODS: Twenty-seven recreationally active (>1 exercise session /week) participants (Age: 22±3y, BMI: 24.3±2.4) completed a randomised cross-over study, whereby each participant completed four HIIT protocols, two already established in research (Ergo-60:60 (cycling 10x60s at 100%W(max)with 60s rest), BW-60:60 (body-weight exercises 10x60swith 60s rest)) and two promoted on social media (SM-20:10 (body-weight exercises 20x20swith 10s rest) and SM-40:20 (body-weight exercises 15x40s with 20s rest)). Blood lactate, heart rate (HR), feeling scale (FS), felt arousal scale (FSA), enjoyment and perceived competence were measured in response to each protocol. RESULTS: Significant differences were observed between BW-60:60 and SM-20:10 for the proportion of intervals meeting the ACSM high-intensity exercise criterion (>80% of HR(max)) (BW-60:60 93±10%, SM-20:10 74±20%, P = 0.039) and change in lactate (BW-60:60 +7.8±3.7mmol/L, SM-20:10 +5.5±2.6mmol/L, P = 0.001). The percentage of time spent above the criterion HR was also significantly lower in SM-20:10 compared to all other protocols (Ergo-60:60 13.9±4.9min, BW-60:60 13.5±3.5min, SM-40:20 12.1±2.4min, SM-20:10 7.7±3.1, P<0.05). No differences were observed in lowest reported FS between protocols (P = 0.268), but FS decreased linearly throughout Ergo-60:60 and BW-60:60 (first vs. last interval P<0.05), but not in SM-20:10 or SM-40:20 (P>0.05). Enjoyment was higher upon completion of BW-60:60 compared to Ergo-60:60 and SM-40:20 (P<0.05). CONCLUSIONS: This study shows that HIIT protocols available on social media offer an interesting real-world alternative for promoting exercise participation. Future studies should continue to investigate these highly popular and practical HIIT protocols.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8480907
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-84809072021-09-30 Evidence-based vs. social media based high-intensity interval training protocols: Physiological and perceptual responses Hesketh, Katie L. Church, Hannah Kinnafick, Florence Shepherd, Sam O. Wagenmakers, Anton J. M. Cocks, Matthew Strauss, Juliette A. PLoS One Research Article OBJECTIVE: High intensity interval training (HIIT) is a time-efficient exercise modality to improve cardiorespiratory fitness, and has recently been popularised by social media influencers. However, little is known regarding acute physiological and perceptual responses to these online protocols compared to HIIT protocols used within research. The aim was to investigate acute physiological, perceptual and motivational responses to two HIIT protocols popular on social media, and compare these to two evidence-based protocols. METHODS: Twenty-seven recreationally active (>1 exercise session /week) participants (Age: 22±3y, BMI: 24.3±2.4) completed a randomised cross-over study, whereby each participant completed four HIIT protocols, two already established in research (Ergo-60:60 (cycling 10x60s at 100%W(max)with 60s rest), BW-60:60 (body-weight exercises 10x60swith 60s rest)) and two promoted on social media (SM-20:10 (body-weight exercises 20x20swith 10s rest) and SM-40:20 (body-weight exercises 15x40s with 20s rest)). Blood lactate, heart rate (HR), feeling scale (FS), felt arousal scale (FSA), enjoyment and perceived competence were measured in response to each protocol. RESULTS: Significant differences were observed between BW-60:60 and SM-20:10 for the proportion of intervals meeting the ACSM high-intensity exercise criterion (>80% of HR(max)) (BW-60:60 93±10%, SM-20:10 74±20%, P = 0.039) and change in lactate (BW-60:60 +7.8±3.7mmol/L, SM-20:10 +5.5±2.6mmol/L, P = 0.001). The percentage of time spent above the criterion HR was also significantly lower in SM-20:10 compared to all other protocols (Ergo-60:60 13.9±4.9min, BW-60:60 13.5±3.5min, SM-40:20 12.1±2.4min, SM-20:10 7.7±3.1, P<0.05). No differences were observed in lowest reported FS between protocols (P = 0.268), but FS decreased linearly throughout Ergo-60:60 and BW-60:60 (first vs. last interval P<0.05), but not in SM-20:10 or SM-40:20 (P>0.05). Enjoyment was higher upon completion of BW-60:60 compared to Ergo-60:60 and SM-40:20 (P<0.05). CONCLUSIONS: This study shows that HIIT protocols available on social media offer an interesting real-world alternative for promoting exercise participation. Future studies should continue to investigate these highly popular and practical HIIT protocols. Public Library of Science 2021-09-29 /pmc/articles/PMC8480907/ /pubmed/34587217 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0257685 Text en © 2021 Hesketh et al https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Hesketh, Katie L.
Church, Hannah
Kinnafick, Florence
Shepherd, Sam O.
Wagenmakers, Anton J. M.
Cocks, Matthew
Strauss, Juliette A.
Evidence-based vs. social media based high-intensity interval training protocols: Physiological and perceptual responses
title Evidence-based vs. social media based high-intensity interval training protocols: Physiological and perceptual responses
title_full Evidence-based vs. social media based high-intensity interval training protocols: Physiological and perceptual responses
title_fullStr Evidence-based vs. social media based high-intensity interval training protocols: Physiological and perceptual responses
title_full_unstemmed Evidence-based vs. social media based high-intensity interval training protocols: Physiological and perceptual responses
title_short Evidence-based vs. social media based high-intensity interval training protocols: Physiological and perceptual responses
title_sort evidence-based vs. social media based high-intensity interval training protocols: physiological and perceptual responses
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8480907/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34587217
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0257685
work_keys_str_mv AT heskethkatiel evidencebasedvssocialmediabasedhighintensityintervaltrainingprotocolsphysiologicalandperceptualresponses
AT churchhannah evidencebasedvssocialmediabasedhighintensityintervaltrainingprotocolsphysiologicalandperceptualresponses
AT kinnafickflorence evidencebasedvssocialmediabasedhighintensityintervaltrainingprotocolsphysiologicalandperceptualresponses
AT shepherdsamo evidencebasedvssocialmediabasedhighintensityintervaltrainingprotocolsphysiologicalandperceptualresponses
AT wagenmakersantonjm evidencebasedvssocialmediabasedhighintensityintervaltrainingprotocolsphysiologicalandperceptualresponses
AT cocksmatthew evidencebasedvssocialmediabasedhighintensityintervaltrainingprotocolsphysiologicalandperceptualresponses
AT straussjuliettea evidencebasedvssocialmediabasedhighintensityintervaltrainingprotocolsphysiologicalandperceptualresponses