Cargando…
Estimating the minimum important difference in the DEMQOL instrument in people with dementia
PURPOSE: The Dementia-Related Quality of Life (DEMQOL) measure and the DEMQOL-Utility Score (DEMQOL-U) are validated tools for measuring quality of life (QOL) in people with dementia. What score changes translate to a clinically significant impact on patients’ lives was unknown. This study establish...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer International Publishing
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8481142/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34114132 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11136-021-02900-7 |
_version_ | 1784576619659132928 |
---|---|
author | Lee, Ellen C. Wright, Jessica Walters, Stephen J. Cooper, Cindy L. Mountain, Gail A. |
author_facet | Lee, Ellen C. Wright, Jessica Walters, Stephen J. Cooper, Cindy L. Mountain, Gail A. |
author_sort | Lee, Ellen C. |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: The Dementia-Related Quality of Life (DEMQOL) measure and the DEMQOL-Utility Score (DEMQOL-U) are validated tools for measuring quality of life (QOL) in people with dementia. What score changes translate to a clinically significant impact on patients’ lives was unknown. This study establishes the minimal important differences (MID) for these two instruments. METHODS: Anchor-based and distribution-based methods were used to estimate the MID scores from patients enrolled in a randomised controlled trial. For the anchor-based method, the global QOL (Q29) item from the DEMQOL was chosen as the anchor for DEMQOL and both Q29 and EQ-5D for DEMQOL-U. A one category difference in Q29, and a 0.07 point difference in EQ-5D score, were used to classify improvement and deterioration, and the MID scores were calculated for each category. These results were compared with scores obtained by the distribution-based methods. RESULTS: A total of 490 people with dementia had baseline DEMQOL data, of these 386 had 8-month data, and 344 had 12-month DEMQOL data. The absolute change in DEMQOL for a combined 1-point increase or decrease in the Q29 anchor was 5.2 at 8 months and 6.0 at 12 months. For the DEMQOL-U, the average absolute change at 8 and 12 months was 0.032 and 0.046 for the Q29 anchor and 0.020 and 0.024 for EQ-5D anchor. CONCLUSION: We present MID scores for the DEMQOL and DEMQOL-U instruments obtained from a large cohort of patients with dementia. An anchored-based estimate of the MID for the DEMQOL is around 5 to 6 points; and 0.02 to 0.05 points for the DEMQOL-U. The results of this study can guide clinicians and researchers in the interpretation of these instruments comparisons between groups or within groups of people with dementia. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER AND DATE OF REGISTRATION: ISRCTN17993825 on 11th October 2016. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s11136-021-02900-7. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8481142 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Springer International Publishing |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-84811422021-10-08 Estimating the minimum important difference in the DEMQOL instrument in people with dementia Lee, Ellen C. Wright, Jessica Walters, Stephen J. Cooper, Cindy L. Mountain, Gail A. Qual Life Res Article PURPOSE: The Dementia-Related Quality of Life (DEMQOL) measure and the DEMQOL-Utility Score (DEMQOL-U) are validated tools for measuring quality of life (QOL) in people with dementia. What score changes translate to a clinically significant impact on patients’ lives was unknown. This study establishes the minimal important differences (MID) for these two instruments. METHODS: Anchor-based and distribution-based methods were used to estimate the MID scores from patients enrolled in a randomised controlled trial. For the anchor-based method, the global QOL (Q29) item from the DEMQOL was chosen as the anchor for DEMQOL and both Q29 and EQ-5D for DEMQOL-U. A one category difference in Q29, and a 0.07 point difference in EQ-5D score, were used to classify improvement and deterioration, and the MID scores were calculated for each category. These results were compared with scores obtained by the distribution-based methods. RESULTS: A total of 490 people with dementia had baseline DEMQOL data, of these 386 had 8-month data, and 344 had 12-month DEMQOL data. The absolute change in DEMQOL for a combined 1-point increase or decrease in the Q29 anchor was 5.2 at 8 months and 6.0 at 12 months. For the DEMQOL-U, the average absolute change at 8 and 12 months was 0.032 and 0.046 for the Q29 anchor and 0.020 and 0.024 for EQ-5D anchor. CONCLUSION: We present MID scores for the DEMQOL and DEMQOL-U instruments obtained from a large cohort of patients with dementia. An anchored-based estimate of the MID for the DEMQOL is around 5 to 6 points; and 0.02 to 0.05 points for the DEMQOL-U. The results of this study can guide clinicians and researchers in the interpretation of these instruments comparisons between groups or within groups of people with dementia. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER AND DATE OF REGISTRATION: ISRCTN17993825 on 11th October 2016. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s11136-021-02900-7. Springer International Publishing 2021-06-10 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC8481142/ /pubmed/34114132 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11136-021-02900-7 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Article Lee, Ellen C. Wright, Jessica Walters, Stephen J. Cooper, Cindy L. Mountain, Gail A. Estimating the minimum important difference in the DEMQOL instrument in people with dementia |
title | Estimating the minimum important difference in the DEMQOL instrument in people with dementia |
title_full | Estimating the minimum important difference in the DEMQOL instrument in people with dementia |
title_fullStr | Estimating the minimum important difference in the DEMQOL instrument in people with dementia |
title_full_unstemmed | Estimating the minimum important difference in the DEMQOL instrument in people with dementia |
title_short | Estimating the minimum important difference in the DEMQOL instrument in people with dementia |
title_sort | estimating the minimum important difference in the demqol instrument in people with dementia |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8481142/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34114132 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11136-021-02900-7 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT leeellenc estimatingtheminimumimportantdifferenceinthedemqolinstrumentinpeoplewithdementia AT wrightjessica estimatingtheminimumimportantdifferenceinthedemqolinstrumentinpeoplewithdementia AT waltersstephenj estimatingtheminimumimportantdifferenceinthedemqolinstrumentinpeoplewithdementia AT coopercindyl estimatingtheminimumimportantdifferenceinthedemqolinstrumentinpeoplewithdementia AT mountaingaila estimatingtheminimumimportantdifferenceinthedemqolinstrumentinpeoplewithdementia |