Cargando…

Adhesion prevention after endometriosis surgery — results of a randomized, controlled clinical trial with second-look laparoscopy

PURPOSE: Adhesion formation after endometriosis surgery is a severe problem affecting up to 90% of patients. Possible complications include chronic pain, ileus, and secondary infertility. Therefore, effective adhesion prophylaxis is desirable, for which the adhesion barrier 4DryField(®) PH is evalua...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Krämer, Bernhard, Andress, Jürgen, Neis, Felix, Hoffmann, Sascha, Brucker, Sara, Kommoss, Stefan, Höller, Alice
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8481146/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34036409
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00423-021-02193-x
_version_ 1784576620761186304
author Krämer, Bernhard
Andress, Jürgen
Neis, Felix
Hoffmann, Sascha
Brucker, Sara
Kommoss, Stefan
Höller, Alice
author_facet Krämer, Bernhard
Andress, Jürgen
Neis, Felix
Hoffmann, Sascha
Brucker, Sara
Kommoss, Stefan
Höller, Alice
author_sort Krämer, Bernhard
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: Adhesion formation after endometriosis surgery is a severe problem affecting up to 90% of patients. Possible complications include chronic pain, ileus, and secondary infertility. Therefore, effective adhesion prophylaxis is desirable, for which the adhesion barrier 4DryField(®) PH is evaluated in the present clinical study. It is a starch-based powder that forms a gel after irrigation with saline solution and thus separates surgical sites as physical barrier for adhesion prevention. METHODS: Fifty patients with extensive and deep infiltrating endometriosis were included in this prospective, randomized, controlled clinical trial with two-staged laparoscopic approach. The patients were randomized into two groups, one receiving 4DryField(®) PH and the other irrigation with saline solution for adhesion prevention. Adhesion formation was directly scored during second-look interventions considering incidence, extent, and severity. Adhesion prevention treatment in the second surgery was performed corresponding to the first intervention to evaluate the long-term outcome in the later course. RESULTS: Both groups were comparable with respect to relevant patient parameters. Severity and extent of adhesions were significantly reduced by 85% in the 4DryField(®) PH group compared to the control group (mean total adhesion score 2.2 vs. 14.2; p = 0.004). Incidence of adhesion formation based on the number of affected sites was significantly reduced by 53% in the intervention vs. control group (mean 1.1 vs. 2.3 sites; p = 0.004). Follow-up of secondary endpoints is not yet completed; results will become available at a later stage. CONCLUSION: Adhesion formation could be reduced significantly by 85% by application of the adhesion barrier 4DryField(®) PH. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Trial registration main ID: DRKS00014720, secondary ID: U1111-1213-4142; date of registration 09th May 2018.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8481146
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-84811462021-10-08 Adhesion prevention after endometriosis surgery — results of a randomized, controlled clinical trial with second-look laparoscopy Krämer, Bernhard Andress, Jürgen Neis, Felix Hoffmann, Sascha Brucker, Sara Kommoss, Stefan Höller, Alice Langenbecks Arch Surg Controlled Clinical Trials PURPOSE: Adhesion formation after endometriosis surgery is a severe problem affecting up to 90% of patients. Possible complications include chronic pain, ileus, and secondary infertility. Therefore, effective adhesion prophylaxis is desirable, for which the adhesion barrier 4DryField(®) PH is evaluated in the present clinical study. It is a starch-based powder that forms a gel after irrigation with saline solution and thus separates surgical sites as physical barrier for adhesion prevention. METHODS: Fifty patients with extensive and deep infiltrating endometriosis were included in this prospective, randomized, controlled clinical trial with two-staged laparoscopic approach. The patients were randomized into two groups, one receiving 4DryField(®) PH and the other irrigation with saline solution for adhesion prevention. Adhesion formation was directly scored during second-look interventions considering incidence, extent, and severity. Adhesion prevention treatment in the second surgery was performed corresponding to the first intervention to evaluate the long-term outcome in the later course. RESULTS: Both groups were comparable with respect to relevant patient parameters. Severity and extent of adhesions were significantly reduced by 85% in the 4DryField(®) PH group compared to the control group (mean total adhesion score 2.2 vs. 14.2; p = 0.004). Incidence of adhesion formation based on the number of affected sites was significantly reduced by 53% in the intervention vs. control group (mean 1.1 vs. 2.3 sites; p = 0.004). Follow-up of secondary endpoints is not yet completed; results will become available at a later stage. CONCLUSION: Adhesion formation could be reduced significantly by 85% by application of the adhesion barrier 4DryField(®) PH. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Trial registration main ID: DRKS00014720, secondary ID: U1111-1213-4142; date of registration 09th May 2018. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2021-05-26 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC8481146/ /pubmed/34036409 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00423-021-02193-x Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Controlled Clinical Trials
Krämer, Bernhard
Andress, Jürgen
Neis, Felix
Hoffmann, Sascha
Brucker, Sara
Kommoss, Stefan
Höller, Alice
Adhesion prevention after endometriosis surgery — results of a randomized, controlled clinical trial with second-look laparoscopy
title Adhesion prevention after endometriosis surgery — results of a randomized, controlled clinical trial with second-look laparoscopy
title_full Adhesion prevention after endometriosis surgery — results of a randomized, controlled clinical trial with second-look laparoscopy
title_fullStr Adhesion prevention after endometriosis surgery — results of a randomized, controlled clinical trial with second-look laparoscopy
title_full_unstemmed Adhesion prevention after endometriosis surgery — results of a randomized, controlled clinical trial with second-look laparoscopy
title_short Adhesion prevention after endometriosis surgery — results of a randomized, controlled clinical trial with second-look laparoscopy
title_sort adhesion prevention after endometriosis surgery — results of a randomized, controlled clinical trial with second-look laparoscopy
topic Controlled Clinical Trials
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8481146/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34036409
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00423-021-02193-x
work_keys_str_mv AT kramerbernhard adhesionpreventionafterendometriosissurgeryresultsofarandomizedcontrolledclinicaltrialwithsecondlooklaparoscopy
AT andressjurgen adhesionpreventionafterendometriosissurgeryresultsofarandomizedcontrolledclinicaltrialwithsecondlooklaparoscopy
AT neisfelix adhesionpreventionafterendometriosissurgeryresultsofarandomizedcontrolledclinicaltrialwithsecondlooklaparoscopy
AT hoffmannsascha adhesionpreventionafterendometriosissurgeryresultsofarandomizedcontrolledclinicaltrialwithsecondlooklaparoscopy
AT bruckersara adhesionpreventionafterendometriosissurgeryresultsofarandomizedcontrolledclinicaltrialwithsecondlooklaparoscopy
AT kommossstefan adhesionpreventionafterendometriosissurgeryresultsofarandomizedcontrolledclinicaltrialwithsecondlooklaparoscopy
AT holleralice adhesionpreventionafterendometriosissurgeryresultsofarandomizedcontrolledclinicaltrialwithsecondlooklaparoscopy