Cargando…
Adhesion prevention after endometriosis surgery — results of a randomized, controlled clinical trial with second-look laparoscopy
PURPOSE: Adhesion formation after endometriosis surgery is a severe problem affecting up to 90% of patients. Possible complications include chronic pain, ileus, and secondary infertility. Therefore, effective adhesion prophylaxis is desirable, for which the adhesion barrier 4DryField(®) PH is evalua...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8481146/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34036409 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00423-021-02193-x |
_version_ | 1784576620761186304 |
---|---|
author | Krämer, Bernhard Andress, Jürgen Neis, Felix Hoffmann, Sascha Brucker, Sara Kommoss, Stefan Höller, Alice |
author_facet | Krämer, Bernhard Andress, Jürgen Neis, Felix Hoffmann, Sascha Brucker, Sara Kommoss, Stefan Höller, Alice |
author_sort | Krämer, Bernhard |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: Adhesion formation after endometriosis surgery is a severe problem affecting up to 90% of patients. Possible complications include chronic pain, ileus, and secondary infertility. Therefore, effective adhesion prophylaxis is desirable, for which the adhesion barrier 4DryField(®) PH is evaluated in the present clinical study. It is a starch-based powder that forms a gel after irrigation with saline solution and thus separates surgical sites as physical barrier for adhesion prevention. METHODS: Fifty patients with extensive and deep infiltrating endometriosis were included in this prospective, randomized, controlled clinical trial with two-staged laparoscopic approach. The patients were randomized into two groups, one receiving 4DryField(®) PH and the other irrigation with saline solution for adhesion prevention. Adhesion formation was directly scored during second-look interventions considering incidence, extent, and severity. Adhesion prevention treatment in the second surgery was performed corresponding to the first intervention to evaluate the long-term outcome in the later course. RESULTS: Both groups were comparable with respect to relevant patient parameters. Severity and extent of adhesions were significantly reduced by 85% in the 4DryField(®) PH group compared to the control group (mean total adhesion score 2.2 vs. 14.2; p = 0.004). Incidence of adhesion formation based on the number of affected sites was significantly reduced by 53% in the intervention vs. control group (mean 1.1 vs. 2.3 sites; p = 0.004). Follow-up of secondary endpoints is not yet completed; results will become available at a later stage. CONCLUSION: Adhesion formation could be reduced significantly by 85% by application of the adhesion barrier 4DryField(®) PH. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Trial registration main ID: DRKS00014720, secondary ID: U1111-1213-4142; date of registration 09th May 2018. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8481146 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Springer Berlin Heidelberg |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-84811462021-10-08 Adhesion prevention after endometriosis surgery — results of a randomized, controlled clinical trial with second-look laparoscopy Krämer, Bernhard Andress, Jürgen Neis, Felix Hoffmann, Sascha Brucker, Sara Kommoss, Stefan Höller, Alice Langenbecks Arch Surg Controlled Clinical Trials PURPOSE: Adhesion formation after endometriosis surgery is a severe problem affecting up to 90% of patients. Possible complications include chronic pain, ileus, and secondary infertility. Therefore, effective adhesion prophylaxis is desirable, for which the adhesion barrier 4DryField(®) PH is evaluated in the present clinical study. It is a starch-based powder that forms a gel after irrigation with saline solution and thus separates surgical sites as physical barrier for adhesion prevention. METHODS: Fifty patients with extensive and deep infiltrating endometriosis were included in this prospective, randomized, controlled clinical trial with two-staged laparoscopic approach. The patients were randomized into two groups, one receiving 4DryField(®) PH and the other irrigation with saline solution for adhesion prevention. Adhesion formation was directly scored during second-look interventions considering incidence, extent, and severity. Adhesion prevention treatment in the second surgery was performed corresponding to the first intervention to evaluate the long-term outcome in the later course. RESULTS: Both groups were comparable with respect to relevant patient parameters. Severity and extent of adhesions were significantly reduced by 85% in the 4DryField(®) PH group compared to the control group (mean total adhesion score 2.2 vs. 14.2; p = 0.004). Incidence of adhesion formation based on the number of affected sites was significantly reduced by 53% in the intervention vs. control group (mean 1.1 vs. 2.3 sites; p = 0.004). Follow-up of secondary endpoints is not yet completed; results will become available at a later stage. CONCLUSION: Adhesion formation could be reduced significantly by 85% by application of the adhesion barrier 4DryField(®) PH. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Trial registration main ID: DRKS00014720, secondary ID: U1111-1213-4142; date of registration 09th May 2018. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2021-05-26 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC8481146/ /pubmed/34036409 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00423-021-02193-x Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Controlled Clinical Trials Krämer, Bernhard Andress, Jürgen Neis, Felix Hoffmann, Sascha Brucker, Sara Kommoss, Stefan Höller, Alice Adhesion prevention after endometriosis surgery — results of a randomized, controlled clinical trial with second-look laparoscopy |
title | Adhesion prevention after endometriosis surgery — results of a randomized, controlled clinical trial with second-look laparoscopy |
title_full | Adhesion prevention after endometriosis surgery — results of a randomized, controlled clinical trial with second-look laparoscopy |
title_fullStr | Adhesion prevention after endometriosis surgery — results of a randomized, controlled clinical trial with second-look laparoscopy |
title_full_unstemmed | Adhesion prevention after endometriosis surgery — results of a randomized, controlled clinical trial with second-look laparoscopy |
title_short | Adhesion prevention after endometriosis surgery — results of a randomized, controlled clinical trial with second-look laparoscopy |
title_sort | adhesion prevention after endometriosis surgery — results of a randomized, controlled clinical trial with second-look laparoscopy |
topic | Controlled Clinical Trials |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8481146/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34036409 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00423-021-02193-x |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kramerbernhard adhesionpreventionafterendometriosissurgeryresultsofarandomizedcontrolledclinicaltrialwithsecondlooklaparoscopy AT andressjurgen adhesionpreventionafterendometriosissurgeryresultsofarandomizedcontrolledclinicaltrialwithsecondlooklaparoscopy AT neisfelix adhesionpreventionafterendometriosissurgeryresultsofarandomizedcontrolledclinicaltrialwithsecondlooklaparoscopy AT hoffmannsascha adhesionpreventionafterendometriosissurgeryresultsofarandomizedcontrolledclinicaltrialwithsecondlooklaparoscopy AT bruckersara adhesionpreventionafterendometriosissurgeryresultsofarandomizedcontrolledclinicaltrialwithsecondlooklaparoscopy AT kommossstefan adhesionpreventionafterendometriosissurgeryresultsofarandomizedcontrolledclinicaltrialwithsecondlooklaparoscopy AT holleralice adhesionpreventionafterendometriosissurgeryresultsofarandomizedcontrolledclinicaltrialwithsecondlooklaparoscopy |