Cargando…

Support for the higher-order factor structure of the WHODAS 2.0 self-report version in a Dutch outpatient psychiatric setting

PURPOSE: Previous studies of the World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0 (WHODAS 2.0) interview version suggested a second-order model, with a general disability factor and six factors on a lower level. The goal of this study is to investigate if we can find support for a simila...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales:	Williams, Guido L., de Beurs, Edwin, Spinhoven, Philip, Flens, Gerard, Paap, Muirne C. S.
Formato:	Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:	English
Publicado:	Springer International Publishing 2021
Materias:	Article
Acceso en línea:	https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8481147/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34117613 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11136-021-02880-8

Ejemplares similares

Psychometric properties and validation of the polish version of the 12-item WHODAS 2.0
por: Ćwirlej-Sozańska, Agnieszka, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Is WHODAS 2.0 Useful for Colorectal Cancer Survivors?
por: Lee, Hyun Haeng, et al.
Publicado: (2017)

Measuring disability in multiple sclerosis: the WHODAS 2.0
por: Young, Carolyn A., et al.
Publicado: (2023)

Clinical validity of the 12-item WHODAS-2.0 in a naturalistic sample of outpatients with psychotic disorders
por: Holmberg, Christopher, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Psychometric Properties of the Polish Version of the 36-Item WHODAS 2.0 in Patients with Low Back Pain
por: Ćwirlej-Sozańska, Agnieszka, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Psychometric properties of the Polish version of the 36-item WHODAS 2.0 in patients with hip and knee osteoarthritis
por: Bejer, Agnieszka, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Performance of the 12-item WHODAS 2.0 in prodromal Huntington disease
por: Kim, Ji-In, et al.
Publicado: (2015)

Towards standardization of measuring anxiety and depression: Differential item functioning for language and Dutch reference values of PROMIS item banks
por: Elsman, Ellen B. M., et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Validation of the 36-item version of the WHO Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0 (WHODAS 2.0) for assessing women's disability and functioning associated with maternal morbidity
por: Silveira, Carla, et al.
Publicado: (2017)

Measurement Invariance of the WHODAS 2.0 in a Population-Based Sample of Youth
por: Kimber, Melissa, et al.
Publicado: (2015)

WHODAS 2.0 in prodromal Huntington disease: measures of functioning in neuropsychiatric disease
por: Downing, Nancy R, et al.
Publicado: (2014)

WHODAS 2.0-BO: normative data for the assessment of disability in older adults
por: Ferrer, Michele Lacerda Pereira, et al.
Publicado: (2019)

Effects of Hearing Disability on the Employment Status Using WHODAS 2.0 in Taiwan
por: Chao, Pin-Zhir, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

WHODAS 2.0 as a Measure of Severity of Illness: Results of a FLDA Analysis
por: Sedano-Capdevila, Alba, et al.
Publicado: (2018)

WHODAS 2.0 Can Predict Institutionalization among Patients with Traumatic Brain Injury
por: Huang, Shih-Wei, et al.
Publicado: (2019)

Psychometric evaluation of the WHODAS 2.0 and prevalence of disability in a Swedish general population
por: Norén, Paulina, et al.
Publicado: (2023)

Construct Validity of the Dutch Version of the 12-Item Partners in Health Scale: Measuring Patient Self-Management Behaviour and Knowledge in Patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
por: Lenferink, Anke, et al.
Publicado: (2016)

Comparison of Three Quality of Life Instruments in Lymphatic Filariasis: DLQI, WHODAS 2.0, and LFSQQ
por: Thomas, Cristina, et al.
Publicado: (2014)

Comparison of the responsiveness of the WOMAC and the 12-item WHODAS 2.0 in patients with Kashin–Beck disease
por: Yang, Lei, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

World Health Organisation Disability Assessment Schedule (WHODAS 2.0): development and validation of the Nigerian Igbo version in patients with chronic low back pain
por: Igwesi-Chidobe, Chinonso Nwamaka, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Using the World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0 (WHODAS 2.0) for Predicting Institutionalization of Patients With Dementia in Taiwan
por: Huang, Shih-Wei, et al.
Publicado: (2015)

Measurement of patient reported disability using WHODAS 2.0 before and after surgical intervention in Madagascar
por: White, Michelle C., et al.
Publicado: (2018)

Using WHODAS 2.0 to Assess Functional Impairment in People with Depression: Should Employment Receive More Attention?
por: Chiang, Yu-Chen, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

WHODAS measurement properties for women with dysmenorrhea
por: de Arruda, Guilherme Tavares, et al.
Publicado: (2023)

Reference ranges of the WHO Disability Assessment Schedule (WHODAS 2.0) score and diagnostic validity of its 12‐item version in identifying altered functioning in healthy postpartum women
por: Mayrink, Jussara, et al.
Publicado: (2018)

An item analysis according to the Rasch model of the German 12-item WHO Disability Assessment Schedule (WHODAS 2.0)
por: Vaganian, Lusine, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

The psychometric properties and minimal clinically important difference for disability assessment using WHODAS 2.0 in critically ill patients
por: Higgins, Alisa M., et al.
Publicado: (2023)

The World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule-2.0 (WHODAS 2.0) in a chronic pain population being considered for chronic opioid therapy
por: Wawrzyniak, Kelly M, et al.
Publicado: (2019)

Making Fixed-Precision Between-Item Multidimensional Computerized Adaptive Tests Even Shorter by Reducing the Asymmetry Between Selection and Stopping Rules
por: Braeken, Johan, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

The impact of hypertension, hemorrhage, and other maternal morbidities on functioning in the postpartum period as assessed by the WHODAS 2.0 36‐item tool
por: Guida, José P., et al.
Publicado: (2018)

Validation of the WHO Disability Assessment Schedule (WHODAS 2.0) 12‐item tool against the 36‐item version for measuring functioning and disability associated with pregnancy and history of severe maternal morbidity
por: Silveira, Carla, et al.
Publicado: (2018)

The 10-item Adverse Childhood Experience International Questionnaire (ACE-IQ-10): psychometric properties of the Dutch version in two clinical samples
por: Van der Feltz-Cornelis, Christina M., et al.
Publicado: (2023)

Higher Order Thinking by Setting and Debriefing Tasks in Dutch Geography Lessons
por: Krause, Uwe, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Evidence for validity of the Swedish self-rated 36-item version of the World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0 (WHODAS 2.0) in patients with mental disorders: a multi-centre cross-sectional study using Rasch analysis
por: Svanborg, Cecilia, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Measurement Efficiency for Fixed-Precision Multidimensional Computerized Adaptive Tests: Comparing Health Measurement and Educational Testing Using Example Banks
por: Paap, Muirne C. S., et al.
Publicado: (2018)

Minimal clinically important difference and minimal detectable change of the World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0 (WHODAS 2.0) amongst patients with chronic musculoskeletal pain
por: Katajapuu, Niina, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Some recommendations for developing multidimensional computerized adaptive tests for patient-reported outcomes
por: Smits, Niels, et al.
Publicado: (2018)

A comparison between WHODAS 2.0 and Modified Barthel Index: which tool is more suitable for assessing the disability and the recovery rate in orthopedic rehabilitation?
por: Galli, Tiziana, et al.
Publicado: (2018)

Comparing Activity and Participation between Acquired Brain Injury and Spinal-Cord Injury in Community-Dwelling People with Severe Disability Using WHODAS 2.0
por: Yoon, Seo Yeon, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Mapping the World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule (WHODAS 2.0) onto SF-6D Using Swedish General Population Data
por: Philipson, Anna, et al.
Publicado: (2023)

Cannot write session to /tmp/vufind_sessions/sess_uuhcpclc19ur9guvbr6gclbt8b