Cargando…
Does Overfilling Smooth Inflatable Saline-Filled Breast Implants Decrease the Deflation Rate? Experience with 4761 Augmentation Mammaplasty Patients
BACKGROUND: Research suggests that overfilling saline inflatable breast implants may decrease their deflation rates. To date, there has been no large-scale study comparing breast implants filled within vs. beyond the manufacturer’s recommended fill volumes. METHODS: A retrospective comparative study...
Autor principal: | |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer US
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8481168/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33712871 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00266-021-02198-3 |
_version_ | 1784576625923325952 |
---|---|
author | Eisenberg, Ted |
author_facet | Eisenberg, Ted |
author_sort | Eisenberg, Ted |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Research suggests that overfilling saline inflatable breast implants may decrease their deflation rates. To date, there has been no large-scale study comparing breast implants filled within vs. beyond the manufacturer’s recommended fill volumes. METHODS: A retrospective comparative study was conducted for 4761 women who underwent aesthetic augmentation mammaplasty by the author. Patients were divided into two groups: Group 1 includes 2960 patients who had breast augmentation between 2002 and 2009 with implants filled within the manufacturer’s recommended fill volumes. Group 2 includes 1801 patients who had breast augmentation between 2011 and 2018. Their implants were overfilled with an average volume between 42 and 50 cc, or 10–13%, respectively. All surgeries were performed with Mentor Style 1600 saline breast implants (smooth, round moderate profile) through an inframammary incision; implants were placed in the subpectoral (dual) plane. Also evaluated was the yearly increase in deflation rates. RESULTS: Group I had 119 deflations, representing a deflation rate of 4.02%. Group 2 had 33 deflations, providing a deflation rate of 1.83%. The author found a protective effect in overfilling the device (p < 0.00001 and Z-score of 4.17). Fold failure was the major reason for deflation in both groups. The implants filled within the manufacturer’s recommended volume had a yearly increase in deflation rate of 0.41%, not 1% as is commonly reported. The overfilled implants did not have a yearly increase in deflation rate. CONCLUSION: Overfilling Mentor Style 1600 saline breast implants (smooth, round moderate profile) 10–13% significantly reduced the deflation rate. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE III: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8481168 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Springer US |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-84811682021-10-08 Does Overfilling Smooth Inflatable Saline-Filled Breast Implants Decrease the Deflation Rate? Experience with 4761 Augmentation Mammaplasty Patients Eisenberg, Ted Aesthetic Plast Surg Original Article BACKGROUND: Research suggests that overfilling saline inflatable breast implants may decrease their deflation rates. To date, there has been no large-scale study comparing breast implants filled within vs. beyond the manufacturer’s recommended fill volumes. METHODS: A retrospective comparative study was conducted for 4761 women who underwent aesthetic augmentation mammaplasty by the author. Patients were divided into two groups: Group 1 includes 2960 patients who had breast augmentation between 2002 and 2009 with implants filled within the manufacturer’s recommended fill volumes. Group 2 includes 1801 patients who had breast augmentation between 2011 and 2018. Their implants were overfilled with an average volume between 42 and 50 cc, or 10–13%, respectively. All surgeries were performed with Mentor Style 1600 saline breast implants (smooth, round moderate profile) through an inframammary incision; implants were placed in the subpectoral (dual) plane. Also evaluated was the yearly increase in deflation rates. RESULTS: Group I had 119 deflations, representing a deflation rate of 4.02%. Group 2 had 33 deflations, providing a deflation rate of 1.83%. The author found a protective effect in overfilling the device (p < 0.00001 and Z-score of 4.17). Fold failure was the major reason for deflation in both groups. The implants filled within the manufacturer’s recommended volume had a yearly increase in deflation rate of 0.41%, not 1% as is commonly reported. The overfilled implants did not have a yearly increase in deflation rate. CONCLUSION: Overfilling Mentor Style 1600 saline breast implants (smooth, round moderate profile) 10–13% significantly reduced the deflation rate. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE III: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266. Springer US 2021-03-12 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC8481168/ /pubmed/33712871 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00266-021-02198-3 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Original Article Eisenberg, Ted Does Overfilling Smooth Inflatable Saline-Filled Breast Implants Decrease the Deflation Rate? Experience with 4761 Augmentation Mammaplasty Patients |
title | Does Overfilling Smooth Inflatable Saline-Filled Breast Implants Decrease the Deflation Rate? Experience with 4761 Augmentation Mammaplasty Patients |
title_full | Does Overfilling Smooth Inflatable Saline-Filled Breast Implants Decrease the Deflation Rate? Experience with 4761 Augmentation Mammaplasty Patients |
title_fullStr | Does Overfilling Smooth Inflatable Saline-Filled Breast Implants Decrease the Deflation Rate? Experience with 4761 Augmentation Mammaplasty Patients |
title_full_unstemmed | Does Overfilling Smooth Inflatable Saline-Filled Breast Implants Decrease the Deflation Rate? Experience with 4761 Augmentation Mammaplasty Patients |
title_short | Does Overfilling Smooth Inflatable Saline-Filled Breast Implants Decrease the Deflation Rate? Experience with 4761 Augmentation Mammaplasty Patients |
title_sort | does overfilling smooth inflatable saline-filled breast implants decrease the deflation rate? experience with 4761 augmentation mammaplasty patients |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8481168/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33712871 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00266-021-02198-3 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT eisenbergted doesoverfillingsmoothinflatablesalinefilledbreastimplantsdecreasethedeflationrateexperiencewith4761augmentationmammaplastypatients |