Cargando…

An item analysis according to the Rasch model of the German 12-item WHO Disability Assessment Schedule (WHODAS 2.0)

PURPOSE: The World Health Organization Disability Assessent Schedule 2.0 (WHODAS 2.0) assesses disability in individuals irrespective of their health condition. Previous studies validated the usefulness of the WHODAS 2.0 using classical test theory. This study is the first investigating the psychome...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Vaganian, Lusine, Bussmann, Sonja, Boecker, Maren, Kusch, Michael, Labouvie, Hildegard, Gerlach, Alexander L., Cwik, Jan C.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8481170/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34014444
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11136-021-02872-8
_version_ 1784576626433982464
author Vaganian, Lusine
Bussmann, Sonja
Boecker, Maren
Kusch, Michael
Labouvie, Hildegard
Gerlach, Alexander L.
Cwik, Jan C.
author_facet Vaganian, Lusine
Bussmann, Sonja
Boecker, Maren
Kusch, Michael
Labouvie, Hildegard
Gerlach, Alexander L.
Cwik, Jan C.
author_sort Vaganian, Lusine
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: The World Health Organization Disability Assessent Schedule 2.0 (WHODAS 2.0) assesses disability in individuals irrespective of their health condition. Previous studies validated the usefulness of the WHODAS 2.0 using classical test theory. This study is the first investigating the psychometric properties of the 12-items WHODAS 2.0 in patients with cancer using item analysis according to the Rasch model. METHODS: In total, 350 cancer patients participated in the study. Rasch analysis of the 12-items version of the WHODAS 2.0 was conducted and included testing unidimensionality, local independence, and testing for differential item functioning (DIF) with regard to age, gender, type of cancer, presence of metastases, psycho-oncological support, and duration of disease. RESULTS: After accounting for local dependence, which was mainly found across items of the same WHODAS domain, satisfactory overall fit to the Rasch model was established (χ(2) = 36.14, p = 0.07) with good reliability (PSI = 0.82) and unidimensionality of the scale. DIF was found for gender (testlet ‘Life activities’) and age (testlet ‘Getting around/Self-care’), but the size of DIF was not substantial. CONCLUSION: Overall, the analysis results according to the Rasch model support the use of the WHODAS 2.0 12-item version as a measure of disability in cancer patients.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8481170
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Springer International Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-84811702021-10-08 An item analysis according to the Rasch model of the German 12-item WHO Disability Assessment Schedule (WHODAS 2.0) Vaganian, Lusine Bussmann, Sonja Boecker, Maren Kusch, Michael Labouvie, Hildegard Gerlach, Alexander L. Cwik, Jan C. Qual Life Res Article PURPOSE: The World Health Organization Disability Assessent Schedule 2.0 (WHODAS 2.0) assesses disability in individuals irrespective of their health condition. Previous studies validated the usefulness of the WHODAS 2.0 using classical test theory. This study is the first investigating the psychometric properties of the 12-items WHODAS 2.0 in patients with cancer using item analysis according to the Rasch model. METHODS: In total, 350 cancer patients participated in the study. Rasch analysis of the 12-items version of the WHODAS 2.0 was conducted and included testing unidimensionality, local independence, and testing for differential item functioning (DIF) with regard to age, gender, type of cancer, presence of metastases, psycho-oncological support, and duration of disease. RESULTS: After accounting for local dependence, which was mainly found across items of the same WHODAS domain, satisfactory overall fit to the Rasch model was established (χ(2) = 36.14, p = 0.07) with good reliability (PSI = 0.82) and unidimensionality of the scale. DIF was found for gender (testlet ‘Life activities’) and age (testlet ‘Getting around/Self-care’), but the size of DIF was not substantial. CONCLUSION: Overall, the analysis results according to the Rasch model support the use of the WHODAS 2.0 12-item version as a measure of disability in cancer patients. Springer International Publishing 2021-05-20 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC8481170/ /pubmed/34014444 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11136-021-02872-8 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Article
Vaganian, Lusine
Bussmann, Sonja
Boecker, Maren
Kusch, Michael
Labouvie, Hildegard
Gerlach, Alexander L.
Cwik, Jan C.
An item analysis according to the Rasch model of the German 12-item WHO Disability Assessment Schedule (WHODAS 2.0)
title An item analysis according to the Rasch model of the German 12-item WHO Disability Assessment Schedule (WHODAS 2.0)
title_full An item analysis according to the Rasch model of the German 12-item WHO Disability Assessment Schedule (WHODAS 2.0)
title_fullStr An item analysis according to the Rasch model of the German 12-item WHO Disability Assessment Schedule (WHODAS 2.0)
title_full_unstemmed An item analysis according to the Rasch model of the German 12-item WHO Disability Assessment Schedule (WHODAS 2.0)
title_short An item analysis according to the Rasch model of the German 12-item WHO Disability Assessment Schedule (WHODAS 2.0)
title_sort item analysis according to the rasch model of the german 12-item who disability assessment schedule (whodas 2.0)
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8481170/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34014444
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11136-021-02872-8
work_keys_str_mv AT vaganianlusine anitemanalysisaccordingtotheraschmodelofthegerman12itemwhodisabilityassessmentschedulewhodas20
AT bussmannsonja anitemanalysisaccordingtotheraschmodelofthegerman12itemwhodisabilityassessmentschedulewhodas20
AT boeckermaren anitemanalysisaccordingtotheraschmodelofthegerman12itemwhodisabilityassessmentschedulewhodas20
AT kuschmichael anitemanalysisaccordingtotheraschmodelofthegerman12itemwhodisabilityassessmentschedulewhodas20
AT labouviehildegard anitemanalysisaccordingtotheraschmodelofthegerman12itemwhodisabilityassessmentschedulewhodas20
AT gerlachalexanderl anitemanalysisaccordingtotheraschmodelofthegerman12itemwhodisabilityassessmentschedulewhodas20
AT cwikjanc anitemanalysisaccordingtotheraschmodelofthegerman12itemwhodisabilityassessmentschedulewhodas20
AT vaganianlusine itemanalysisaccordingtotheraschmodelofthegerman12itemwhodisabilityassessmentschedulewhodas20
AT bussmannsonja itemanalysisaccordingtotheraschmodelofthegerman12itemwhodisabilityassessmentschedulewhodas20
AT boeckermaren itemanalysisaccordingtotheraschmodelofthegerman12itemwhodisabilityassessmentschedulewhodas20
AT kuschmichael itemanalysisaccordingtotheraschmodelofthegerman12itemwhodisabilityassessmentschedulewhodas20
AT labouviehildegard itemanalysisaccordingtotheraschmodelofthegerman12itemwhodisabilityassessmentschedulewhodas20
AT gerlachalexanderl itemanalysisaccordingtotheraschmodelofthegerman12itemwhodisabilityassessmentschedulewhodas20
AT cwikjanc itemanalysisaccordingtotheraschmodelofthegerman12itemwhodisabilityassessmentschedulewhodas20