Cargando…
An item analysis according to the Rasch model of the German 12-item WHO Disability Assessment Schedule (WHODAS 2.0)
PURPOSE: The World Health Organization Disability Assessent Schedule 2.0 (WHODAS 2.0) assesses disability in individuals irrespective of their health condition. Previous studies validated the usefulness of the WHODAS 2.0 using classical test theory. This study is the first investigating the psychome...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer International Publishing
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8481170/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34014444 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11136-021-02872-8 |
_version_ | 1784576626433982464 |
---|---|
author | Vaganian, Lusine Bussmann, Sonja Boecker, Maren Kusch, Michael Labouvie, Hildegard Gerlach, Alexander L. Cwik, Jan C. |
author_facet | Vaganian, Lusine Bussmann, Sonja Boecker, Maren Kusch, Michael Labouvie, Hildegard Gerlach, Alexander L. Cwik, Jan C. |
author_sort | Vaganian, Lusine |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: The World Health Organization Disability Assessent Schedule 2.0 (WHODAS 2.0) assesses disability in individuals irrespective of their health condition. Previous studies validated the usefulness of the WHODAS 2.0 using classical test theory. This study is the first investigating the psychometric properties of the 12-items WHODAS 2.0 in patients with cancer using item analysis according to the Rasch model. METHODS: In total, 350 cancer patients participated in the study. Rasch analysis of the 12-items version of the WHODAS 2.0 was conducted and included testing unidimensionality, local independence, and testing for differential item functioning (DIF) with regard to age, gender, type of cancer, presence of metastases, psycho-oncological support, and duration of disease. RESULTS: After accounting for local dependence, which was mainly found across items of the same WHODAS domain, satisfactory overall fit to the Rasch model was established (χ(2) = 36.14, p = 0.07) with good reliability (PSI = 0.82) and unidimensionality of the scale. DIF was found for gender (testlet ‘Life activities’) and age (testlet ‘Getting around/Self-care’), but the size of DIF was not substantial. CONCLUSION: Overall, the analysis results according to the Rasch model support the use of the WHODAS 2.0 12-item version as a measure of disability in cancer patients. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8481170 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Springer International Publishing |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-84811702021-10-08 An item analysis according to the Rasch model of the German 12-item WHO Disability Assessment Schedule (WHODAS 2.0) Vaganian, Lusine Bussmann, Sonja Boecker, Maren Kusch, Michael Labouvie, Hildegard Gerlach, Alexander L. Cwik, Jan C. Qual Life Res Article PURPOSE: The World Health Organization Disability Assessent Schedule 2.0 (WHODAS 2.0) assesses disability in individuals irrespective of their health condition. Previous studies validated the usefulness of the WHODAS 2.0 using classical test theory. This study is the first investigating the psychometric properties of the 12-items WHODAS 2.0 in patients with cancer using item analysis according to the Rasch model. METHODS: In total, 350 cancer patients participated in the study. Rasch analysis of the 12-items version of the WHODAS 2.0 was conducted and included testing unidimensionality, local independence, and testing for differential item functioning (DIF) with regard to age, gender, type of cancer, presence of metastases, psycho-oncological support, and duration of disease. RESULTS: After accounting for local dependence, which was mainly found across items of the same WHODAS domain, satisfactory overall fit to the Rasch model was established (χ(2) = 36.14, p = 0.07) with good reliability (PSI = 0.82) and unidimensionality of the scale. DIF was found for gender (testlet ‘Life activities’) and age (testlet ‘Getting around/Self-care’), but the size of DIF was not substantial. CONCLUSION: Overall, the analysis results according to the Rasch model support the use of the WHODAS 2.0 12-item version as a measure of disability in cancer patients. Springer International Publishing 2021-05-20 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC8481170/ /pubmed/34014444 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11136-021-02872-8 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Article Vaganian, Lusine Bussmann, Sonja Boecker, Maren Kusch, Michael Labouvie, Hildegard Gerlach, Alexander L. Cwik, Jan C. An item analysis according to the Rasch model of the German 12-item WHO Disability Assessment Schedule (WHODAS 2.0) |
title | An item analysis according to the Rasch model of the German 12-item WHO Disability Assessment Schedule (WHODAS 2.0) |
title_full | An item analysis according to the Rasch model of the German 12-item WHO Disability Assessment Schedule (WHODAS 2.0) |
title_fullStr | An item analysis according to the Rasch model of the German 12-item WHO Disability Assessment Schedule (WHODAS 2.0) |
title_full_unstemmed | An item analysis according to the Rasch model of the German 12-item WHO Disability Assessment Schedule (WHODAS 2.0) |
title_short | An item analysis according to the Rasch model of the German 12-item WHO Disability Assessment Schedule (WHODAS 2.0) |
title_sort | item analysis according to the rasch model of the german 12-item who disability assessment schedule (whodas 2.0) |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8481170/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34014444 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11136-021-02872-8 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT vaganianlusine anitemanalysisaccordingtotheraschmodelofthegerman12itemwhodisabilityassessmentschedulewhodas20 AT bussmannsonja anitemanalysisaccordingtotheraschmodelofthegerman12itemwhodisabilityassessmentschedulewhodas20 AT boeckermaren anitemanalysisaccordingtotheraschmodelofthegerman12itemwhodisabilityassessmentschedulewhodas20 AT kuschmichael anitemanalysisaccordingtotheraschmodelofthegerman12itemwhodisabilityassessmentschedulewhodas20 AT labouviehildegard anitemanalysisaccordingtotheraschmodelofthegerman12itemwhodisabilityassessmentschedulewhodas20 AT gerlachalexanderl anitemanalysisaccordingtotheraschmodelofthegerman12itemwhodisabilityassessmentschedulewhodas20 AT cwikjanc anitemanalysisaccordingtotheraschmodelofthegerman12itemwhodisabilityassessmentschedulewhodas20 AT vaganianlusine itemanalysisaccordingtotheraschmodelofthegerman12itemwhodisabilityassessmentschedulewhodas20 AT bussmannsonja itemanalysisaccordingtotheraschmodelofthegerman12itemwhodisabilityassessmentschedulewhodas20 AT boeckermaren itemanalysisaccordingtotheraschmodelofthegerman12itemwhodisabilityassessmentschedulewhodas20 AT kuschmichael itemanalysisaccordingtotheraschmodelofthegerman12itemwhodisabilityassessmentschedulewhodas20 AT labouviehildegard itemanalysisaccordingtotheraschmodelofthegerman12itemwhodisabilityassessmentschedulewhodas20 AT gerlachalexanderl itemanalysisaccordingtotheraschmodelofthegerman12itemwhodisabilityassessmentschedulewhodas20 AT cwikjanc itemanalysisaccordingtotheraschmodelofthegerman12itemwhodisabilityassessmentschedulewhodas20 |