Cargando…

An item analysis according to the Rasch model of the German 12-item WHO Disability Assessment Schedule (WHODAS 2.0)

PURPOSE: The World Health Organization Disability Assessent Schedule 2.0 (WHODAS 2.0) assesses disability in individuals irrespective of their health condition. Previous studies validated the usefulness of the WHODAS 2.0 using classical test theory. This study is the first investigating the psychome...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales:	Vaganian, Lusine, Bussmann, Sonja, Boecker, Maren, Kusch, Michael, Labouvie, Hildegard, Gerlach, Alexander L., Cwik, Jan C.
Formato:	Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:	English
Publicado:	Springer International Publishing 2021
Materias:	Article
Acceso en línea:	https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8481170/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34014444 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11136-021-02872-8

Ejemplares similares

Psychometric evaluation of the Positive Mental Health (PMH) scale using item response theory
por: Vaganian, Lusine, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Critical consideration of assessment methods for clinically significant changes of mental distress after psycho‐oncological interventions
por: Vaganian, Lusine, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Psychometric evaluation of the Interpersonal Needs Questionnaire (INQ) using item analysis according to the Rasch model
por: Upegui-Arango, Luz Dary, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Validation of the WHO Disability Assessment Schedule (WHODAS 2.0) 12‐item tool against the 36‐item version for measuring functioning and disability associated with pregnancy and history of severe maternal morbidity
por: Silveira, Carla, et al.
Publicado: (2018)

Validation of the 36-item version of the WHO Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0 (WHODAS 2.0) for assessing women's disability and functioning associated with maternal morbidity
por: Silveira, Carla, et al.
Publicado: (2017)

Development and calibration of an item bank for the assessment of activities of daily living in cardiovascular patients using Rasch analysis
por: Baumeister, Harald, et al.
Publicado: (2013)

Minimal important difference of the 12-item World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule (WHODAS) 2.0 in persons with chronic low back pain
por: Wong, Jessica J., et al.
Publicado: (2023)

Performance of the 12-item WHODAS 2.0 in prodromal Huntington disease
por: Kim, Ji-In, et al.
Publicado: (2015)

Psychometric properties and validation of the polish version of the 12-item WHODAS 2.0
por: Ćwirlej-Sozańska, Agnieszka, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis of the 12-item Arabic World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule (WHODAS 2.0) as a screening tool for Syrian refugees
por: Akhtar, Aemal, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Evidence for validity of the Swedish self-rated 36-item version of the World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0 (WHODAS 2.0) in patients with mental disorders: a multi-centre cross-sectional study using Rasch analysis
por: Svanborg, Cecilia, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Development of the German social attitude barriers and facilitators to participation-scales: an analysis according to the Rasch model
por: Upegui-Arango, Luz Dary, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Reference ranges of the WHO Disability Assessment Schedule (WHODAS 2.0) score and diagnostic validity of its 12‐item version in identifying altered functioning in healthy postpartum women
por: Mayrink, Jussara, et al.
Publicado: (2018)

Item analysis of the KIDSCREEN-10 using Rasch modelling
por: Müller, Marianne, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Semi-automated Rasch analysis with differential item functioning
por: Wijayanto, Feri, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Comparison of the responsiveness of the WOMAC and the 12-item WHODAS 2.0 in patients with Kashin–Beck disease
por: Yang, Lei, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Validation of the “World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule for Children, WHODAS-Child” in Rwanda
por: Scorza, Pamela, et al.
Publicado: (2013)

Psychometric Properties of the Polish Version of the 36-Item WHODAS 2.0 in Patients with Low Back Pain
por: Ćwirlej-Sozańska, Agnieszka, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Clinical validity of the 12-item WHODAS-2.0 in a naturalistic sample of outpatients with psychotic disorders
por: Holmberg, Christopher, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Psychometric properties of the Polish version of the 36-item WHODAS 2.0 in patients with hip and knee osteoarthritis
por: Bejer, Agnieszka, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Psychometric properties of the 12-item WHODAS applied through phone survey: an experience in PERSIAN Traffic Cohort
por: Shahedifar, Nasrin, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

The 12 items Amharic version WHODAS-2 showed cultural adaptation and used to measure disability among road traffic trauma victims in Ethiopia
por: Denu, Zewditu Abdissa, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Test of Gross Motor Development-3: Item Difficulty and Item Differential Functioning by Gender and Age with Rasch Analysis
por: Valentini, Nadia Cristina, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Validation of the "World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule, WHODAS-2" in patients with chronic diseases
por: Garin, Olatz, et al.
Publicado: (2010)

Normative Data for the 12 Item WHO Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0
por: Andrews, Gavin, et al.
Publicado: (2009)

Development and Rasch Analysis of the 18-Item Health Resilience Profile (HRP)
por: Papini, Natalie M., et al.
Publicado: (2023)

The 12-item World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule II (WHO-DAS II): a nonparametric item response analysis
por: Luciano, Juan V, et al.
Publicado: (2010)

Psychometric performance of the PROMIS® depression item bank: a comparison of the 28- and 51-item versions using Rasch measurement theory
por: Cleanthous, Sophie, et al.
Publicado: (2019)

Validation of the Rasch-based Depression Screening in a large scale German general population sample
por: Forkmann, Thomas, et al.
Publicado: (2010)

Psychometric limitations of the 13-item Sense of Coherence Scale assessed by Rasch analysis
por: Lerdal, Anners, et al.
Publicado: (2017)

Linking of Rasch-Scaled Tests: Consequences of Limited Item Pools and Model Misfit
por: Fischer, Luise, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

The 12-item Self-Report World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule (WHODAS) 2.0 Administered Via the Internet to Individuals With Anxiety and Stress Disorders: A Psychometric Investigation Based on Data From Two Clinical Trials
por: Axelsson, Erland, et al.
Publicado: (2017)

The impact of hypertension, hemorrhage, and other maternal morbidities on functioning in the postpartum period as assessed by the WHODAS 2.0 36‐item tool
por: Guida, José P., et al.
Publicado: (2018)

Measuring disability in multiple sclerosis: the WHODAS 2.0
por: Young, Carolyn A., et al.
Publicado: (2023)

Applying Rasch analysis to the SF-36 physical function scale: effect of dependent items
por: Horton, Mike, et al.
Publicado: (2011)

Recent advances in analysis of differential item functioning in health research using the Rasch model
por: Hagquist, Curt, et al.
Publicado: (2017)

Development of the 8-Item Phlegm Pattern Questionnaire (PPQ-8) Using Rasch Analysis
por: Park, Young-Jae
Publicado: (2021)

Differential Item Functioning of the Mini-BESTest Balance Measure: A Rasch Analysis Study
por: Caronni, Antonio, et al.
Publicado: (2023)

The 12-item WHO Disability Assessment Schedule II as an outcome measure for treatment of common mental disorders
por: Thomas, C.C., et al.
Publicado: (2016)

Rasch analysis of the Persian version of PedsQL(TM) Oral Health Scale: further psychometric evaluation on item validity including differential item functioning
por: Lin, Chung-Ying, et al.
Publicado: (2016)

Cannot write session to /tmp/vufind_sessions/sess_67ig7brct5q9n26oajca9d7oul