Cargando…

Tissue Fillers for the Nasolabial Fold Area: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Clinical Trials

ABSTRACT: Tissue fillers injections remain to be one of the most commonly performed cosmetic procedures. The aim of this meta-analysis was to systematize and present available data on the aesthetic outcomes and safety of treating the nasolabial fold area with tissue fillers. We conducted a systemati...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Stefura, Tomasz, Kacprzyk, Artur, Droś, Jakub, Krzysztofik, Marta, Skomarovska, Oksana, Fijałkowska, Marta, Koziej, Mateusz
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer US 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8481177/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34255156
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00266-021-02439-5
_version_ 1784576627943931904
author Stefura, Tomasz
Kacprzyk, Artur
Droś, Jakub
Krzysztofik, Marta
Skomarovska, Oksana
Fijałkowska, Marta
Koziej, Mateusz
author_facet Stefura, Tomasz
Kacprzyk, Artur
Droś, Jakub
Krzysztofik, Marta
Skomarovska, Oksana
Fijałkowska, Marta
Koziej, Mateusz
author_sort Stefura, Tomasz
collection PubMed
description ABSTRACT: Tissue fillers injections remain to be one of the most commonly performed cosmetic procedures. The aim of this meta-analysis was to systematize and present available data on the aesthetic outcomes and safety of treating the nasolabial fold area with tissue fillers. We conducted a systematic review of randomized clinical trials that report outcomes concerning treatment of nasolabial fold area with tissue fillers. We searched the MEDLINE/PubMed, ScienceDirect, EMBASE, BIOSIS, SciELO, Scopus, Cochrane Controlled Register of Trials, CNKI and Web of Science databases. Primary outcomes included aesthetic improvement measured using the Wrinkle Severity Rating Scale score and Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale. Secondary outcomes were incidence rates of complications occurring after the procedure. At baseline, the pooled mean WSRS score was 3.23 (95% CI: 3.20–3.26). One month after the procedure, the pooled WSRS score had reached 1.79 (95% CI: 1.74–1.83). After six months it was 2.02 (95% CI: 1.99–2.05) and after 12 months it was 2.46 (95% CI: 2.4–2.52). One month after the procedure, the pooled GAIS score had reached 2.21 (95% CI: 2.14–2.28). After six months, it was 2.32 (95% CI: 2.26–2.37), and after 12 months, it was 1.27 (95% CI: 1.12–1.42). Overall, the pooled incidence of all complications was 0.58 (95% CI: 0.46–0.7). Most common included lumpiness (43%), tenderness (41%), swelling (34%) and bruising (29%). Tissue fillers used for nasolabial fold area treatment allow achieving a satisfying and sustainable improvement. Most common complications include tenderness, lumpiness, swelling, and bruising. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE II: "This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors  www.springer.com/00266." SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00266-021-02439-5.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8481177
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Springer US
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-84811772021-10-08 Tissue Fillers for the Nasolabial Fold Area: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Clinical Trials Stefura, Tomasz Kacprzyk, Artur Droś, Jakub Krzysztofik, Marta Skomarovska, Oksana Fijałkowska, Marta Koziej, Mateusz Aesthetic Plast Surg Review ABSTRACT: Tissue fillers injections remain to be one of the most commonly performed cosmetic procedures. The aim of this meta-analysis was to systematize and present available data on the aesthetic outcomes and safety of treating the nasolabial fold area with tissue fillers. We conducted a systematic review of randomized clinical trials that report outcomes concerning treatment of nasolabial fold area with tissue fillers. We searched the MEDLINE/PubMed, ScienceDirect, EMBASE, BIOSIS, SciELO, Scopus, Cochrane Controlled Register of Trials, CNKI and Web of Science databases. Primary outcomes included aesthetic improvement measured using the Wrinkle Severity Rating Scale score and Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale. Secondary outcomes were incidence rates of complications occurring after the procedure. At baseline, the pooled mean WSRS score was 3.23 (95% CI: 3.20–3.26). One month after the procedure, the pooled WSRS score had reached 1.79 (95% CI: 1.74–1.83). After six months it was 2.02 (95% CI: 1.99–2.05) and after 12 months it was 2.46 (95% CI: 2.4–2.52). One month after the procedure, the pooled GAIS score had reached 2.21 (95% CI: 2.14–2.28). After six months, it was 2.32 (95% CI: 2.26–2.37), and after 12 months, it was 1.27 (95% CI: 1.12–1.42). Overall, the pooled incidence of all complications was 0.58 (95% CI: 0.46–0.7). Most common included lumpiness (43%), tenderness (41%), swelling (34%) and bruising (29%). Tissue fillers used for nasolabial fold area treatment allow achieving a satisfying and sustainable improvement. Most common complications include tenderness, lumpiness, swelling, and bruising. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE II: "This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors  www.springer.com/00266." SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00266-021-02439-5. Springer US 2021-07-13 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC8481177/ /pubmed/34255156 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00266-021-02439-5 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Review
Stefura, Tomasz
Kacprzyk, Artur
Droś, Jakub
Krzysztofik, Marta
Skomarovska, Oksana
Fijałkowska, Marta
Koziej, Mateusz
Tissue Fillers for the Nasolabial Fold Area: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Clinical Trials
title Tissue Fillers for the Nasolabial Fold Area: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Clinical Trials
title_full Tissue Fillers for the Nasolabial Fold Area: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Clinical Trials
title_fullStr Tissue Fillers for the Nasolabial Fold Area: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Clinical Trials
title_full_unstemmed Tissue Fillers for the Nasolabial Fold Area: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Clinical Trials
title_short Tissue Fillers for the Nasolabial Fold Area: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Clinical Trials
title_sort tissue fillers for the nasolabial fold area: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8481177/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34255156
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00266-021-02439-5
work_keys_str_mv AT stefuratomasz tissuefillersforthenasolabialfoldareaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomizedclinicaltrials
AT kacprzykartur tissuefillersforthenasolabialfoldareaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomizedclinicaltrials
AT drosjakub tissuefillersforthenasolabialfoldareaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomizedclinicaltrials
AT krzysztofikmarta tissuefillersforthenasolabialfoldareaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomizedclinicaltrials
AT skomarovskaoksana tissuefillersforthenasolabialfoldareaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomizedclinicaltrials
AT fijałkowskamarta tissuefillersforthenasolabialfoldareaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomizedclinicaltrials
AT koziejmateusz tissuefillersforthenasolabialfoldareaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomizedclinicaltrials