Cargando…
Tissue Fillers for the Nasolabial Fold Area: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Clinical Trials
ABSTRACT: Tissue fillers injections remain to be one of the most commonly performed cosmetic procedures. The aim of this meta-analysis was to systematize and present available data on the aesthetic outcomes and safety of treating the nasolabial fold area with tissue fillers. We conducted a systemati...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer US
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8481177/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34255156 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00266-021-02439-5 |
_version_ | 1784576627943931904 |
---|---|
author | Stefura, Tomasz Kacprzyk, Artur Droś, Jakub Krzysztofik, Marta Skomarovska, Oksana Fijałkowska, Marta Koziej, Mateusz |
author_facet | Stefura, Tomasz Kacprzyk, Artur Droś, Jakub Krzysztofik, Marta Skomarovska, Oksana Fijałkowska, Marta Koziej, Mateusz |
author_sort | Stefura, Tomasz |
collection | PubMed |
description | ABSTRACT: Tissue fillers injections remain to be one of the most commonly performed cosmetic procedures. The aim of this meta-analysis was to systematize and present available data on the aesthetic outcomes and safety of treating the nasolabial fold area with tissue fillers. We conducted a systematic review of randomized clinical trials that report outcomes concerning treatment of nasolabial fold area with tissue fillers. We searched the MEDLINE/PubMed, ScienceDirect, EMBASE, BIOSIS, SciELO, Scopus, Cochrane Controlled Register of Trials, CNKI and Web of Science databases. Primary outcomes included aesthetic improvement measured using the Wrinkle Severity Rating Scale score and Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale. Secondary outcomes were incidence rates of complications occurring after the procedure. At baseline, the pooled mean WSRS score was 3.23 (95% CI: 3.20–3.26). One month after the procedure, the pooled WSRS score had reached 1.79 (95% CI: 1.74–1.83). After six months it was 2.02 (95% CI: 1.99–2.05) and after 12 months it was 2.46 (95% CI: 2.4–2.52). One month after the procedure, the pooled GAIS score had reached 2.21 (95% CI: 2.14–2.28). After six months, it was 2.32 (95% CI: 2.26–2.37), and after 12 months, it was 1.27 (95% CI: 1.12–1.42). Overall, the pooled incidence of all complications was 0.58 (95% CI: 0.46–0.7). Most common included lumpiness (43%), tenderness (41%), swelling (34%) and bruising (29%). Tissue fillers used for nasolabial fold area treatment allow achieving a satisfying and sustainable improvement. Most common complications include tenderness, lumpiness, swelling, and bruising. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE II: "This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266." SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00266-021-02439-5. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8481177 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Springer US |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-84811772021-10-08 Tissue Fillers for the Nasolabial Fold Area: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Clinical Trials Stefura, Tomasz Kacprzyk, Artur Droś, Jakub Krzysztofik, Marta Skomarovska, Oksana Fijałkowska, Marta Koziej, Mateusz Aesthetic Plast Surg Review ABSTRACT: Tissue fillers injections remain to be one of the most commonly performed cosmetic procedures. The aim of this meta-analysis was to systematize and present available data on the aesthetic outcomes and safety of treating the nasolabial fold area with tissue fillers. We conducted a systematic review of randomized clinical trials that report outcomes concerning treatment of nasolabial fold area with tissue fillers. We searched the MEDLINE/PubMed, ScienceDirect, EMBASE, BIOSIS, SciELO, Scopus, Cochrane Controlled Register of Trials, CNKI and Web of Science databases. Primary outcomes included aesthetic improvement measured using the Wrinkle Severity Rating Scale score and Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale. Secondary outcomes were incidence rates of complications occurring after the procedure. At baseline, the pooled mean WSRS score was 3.23 (95% CI: 3.20–3.26). One month after the procedure, the pooled WSRS score had reached 1.79 (95% CI: 1.74–1.83). After six months it was 2.02 (95% CI: 1.99–2.05) and after 12 months it was 2.46 (95% CI: 2.4–2.52). One month after the procedure, the pooled GAIS score had reached 2.21 (95% CI: 2.14–2.28). After six months, it was 2.32 (95% CI: 2.26–2.37), and after 12 months, it was 1.27 (95% CI: 1.12–1.42). Overall, the pooled incidence of all complications was 0.58 (95% CI: 0.46–0.7). Most common included lumpiness (43%), tenderness (41%), swelling (34%) and bruising (29%). Tissue fillers used for nasolabial fold area treatment allow achieving a satisfying and sustainable improvement. Most common complications include tenderness, lumpiness, swelling, and bruising. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE II: "This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266." SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00266-021-02439-5. Springer US 2021-07-13 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC8481177/ /pubmed/34255156 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00266-021-02439-5 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Review Stefura, Tomasz Kacprzyk, Artur Droś, Jakub Krzysztofik, Marta Skomarovska, Oksana Fijałkowska, Marta Koziej, Mateusz Tissue Fillers for the Nasolabial Fold Area: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Clinical Trials |
title | Tissue Fillers for the Nasolabial Fold Area: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Clinical Trials |
title_full | Tissue Fillers for the Nasolabial Fold Area: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Clinical Trials |
title_fullStr | Tissue Fillers for the Nasolabial Fold Area: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Clinical Trials |
title_full_unstemmed | Tissue Fillers for the Nasolabial Fold Area: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Clinical Trials |
title_short | Tissue Fillers for the Nasolabial Fold Area: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Clinical Trials |
title_sort | tissue fillers for the nasolabial fold area: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8481177/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34255156 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00266-021-02439-5 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT stefuratomasz tissuefillersforthenasolabialfoldareaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomizedclinicaltrials AT kacprzykartur tissuefillersforthenasolabialfoldareaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomizedclinicaltrials AT drosjakub tissuefillersforthenasolabialfoldareaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomizedclinicaltrials AT krzysztofikmarta tissuefillersforthenasolabialfoldareaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomizedclinicaltrials AT skomarovskaoksana tissuefillersforthenasolabialfoldareaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomizedclinicaltrials AT fijałkowskamarta tissuefillersforthenasolabialfoldareaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomizedclinicaltrials AT koziejmateusz tissuefillersforthenasolabialfoldareaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomizedclinicaltrials |