Cargando…
Minimal important change (MIC): a conceptual clarification and systematic review of MIC estimates of PROMIS measures
We define the minimal important change (MIC) as a threshold for a minimal within-person change over time above which patients perceive themselves importantly changed. There is a lot of confusion about the concept of MIC, particularly about the concepts of minimal important change and minimal detecta...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer International Publishing
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8481206/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34247326 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11136-021-02925-y |
_version_ | 1784576634348634112 |
---|---|
author | Terwee, Caroline B. Peipert, John Devin Chapman, Robert Lai, Jin-Shei Terluin, Berend Cella, David Griffiths, Pip Mokkink, Lidwine B. |
author_facet | Terwee, Caroline B. Peipert, John Devin Chapman, Robert Lai, Jin-Shei Terluin, Berend Cella, David Griffiths, Pip Mokkink, Lidwine B. |
author_sort | Terwee, Caroline B. |
collection | PubMed |
description | We define the minimal important change (MIC) as a threshold for a minimal within-person change over time above which patients perceive themselves importantly changed. There is a lot of confusion about the concept of MIC, particularly about the concepts of minimal important change and minimal detectable change, which questions the validity of published MIC values. The aims of this study were: (1) to clarify the concept of MIC and how to use it; (2) to provide practical guidance for estimating methodologically sound MIC values; and (3) to improve the applicability of PROMIS by summarizing the available evidence on plausible PROMIS MIC values. We discuss the concept of MIC and how to use it and provide practical guidance for estimating MIC values. In addition, we performed a systematic review in PubMed on MIC values of any PROMIS measure from studies using recommended approaches. A total of 50 studies estimated the MIC of a PROMIS measure, of which 19 studies used less appropriate methods. MIC values of the remaining 31 studies ranged from 0.1 to 12.7 T-score points. We recommend to use the predictive modeling method, possibly supplemented with the vignette-based method, in future MIC studies. We consider a MIC value of 2–6 T-score points for PROMIS measures reasonable to assume at this point. For surgical interventions a higher MIC value might be appropriate. We recommend more high-quality studies estimating MIC values for PROMIS. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s11136-021-02925-y. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8481206 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Springer International Publishing |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-84812062021-10-08 Minimal important change (MIC): a conceptual clarification and systematic review of MIC estimates of PROMIS measures Terwee, Caroline B. Peipert, John Devin Chapman, Robert Lai, Jin-Shei Terluin, Berend Cella, David Griffiths, Pip Mokkink, Lidwine B. Qual Life Res Review We define the minimal important change (MIC) as a threshold for a minimal within-person change over time above which patients perceive themselves importantly changed. There is a lot of confusion about the concept of MIC, particularly about the concepts of minimal important change and minimal detectable change, which questions the validity of published MIC values. The aims of this study were: (1) to clarify the concept of MIC and how to use it; (2) to provide practical guidance for estimating methodologically sound MIC values; and (3) to improve the applicability of PROMIS by summarizing the available evidence on plausible PROMIS MIC values. We discuss the concept of MIC and how to use it and provide practical guidance for estimating MIC values. In addition, we performed a systematic review in PubMed on MIC values of any PROMIS measure from studies using recommended approaches. A total of 50 studies estimated the MIC of a PROMIS measure, of which 19 studies used less appropriate methods. MIC values of the remaining 31 studies ranged from 0.1 to 12.7 T-score points. We recommend to use the predictive modeling method, possibly supplemented with the vignette-based method, in future MIC studies. We consider a MIC value of 2–6 T-score points for PROMIS measures reasonable to assume at this point. For surgical interventions a higher MIC value might be appropriate. We recommend more high-quality studies estimating MIC values for PROMIS. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s11136-021-02925-y. Springer International Publishing 2021-07-10 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC8481206/ /pubmed/34247326 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11136-021-02925-y Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Review Terwee, Caroline B. Peipert, John Devin Chapman, Robert Lai, Jin-Shei Terluin, Berend Cella, David Griffiths, Pip Mokkink, Lidwine B. Minimal important change (MIC): a conceptual clarification and systematic review of MIC estimates of PROMIS measures |
title | Minimal important change (MIC): a conceptual clarification and systematic review of MIC estimates of PROMIS measures |
title_full | Minimal important change (MIC): a conceptual clarification and systematic review of MIC estimates of PROMIS measures |
title_fullStr | Minimal important change (MIC): a conceptual clarification and systematic review of MIC estimates of PROMIS measures |
title_full_unstemmed | Minimal important change (MIC): a conceptual clarification and systematic review of MIC estimates of PROMIS measures |
title_short | Minimal important change (MIC): a conceptual clarification and systematic review of MIC estimates of PROMIS measures |
title_sort | minimal important change (mic): a conceptual clarification and systematic review of mic estimates of promis measures |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8481206/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34247326 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11136-021-02925-y |
work_keys_str_mv | AT terweecarolineb minimalimportantchangemicaconceptualclarificationandsystematicreviewofmicestimatesofpromismeasures AT peipertjohndevin minimalimportantchangemicaconceptualclarificationandsystematicreviewofmicestimatesofpromismeasures AT chapmanrobert minimalimportantchangemicaconceptualclarificationandsystematicreviewofmicestimatesofpromismeasures AT laijinshei minimalimportantchangemicaconceptualclarificationandsystematicreviewofmicestimatesofpromismeasures AT terluinberend minimalimportantchangemicaconceptualclarificationandsystematicreviewofmicestimatesofpromismeasures AT celladavid minimalimportantchangemicaconceptualclarificationandsystematicreviewofmicestimatesofpromismeasures AT griffithspip minimalimportantchangemicaconceptualclarificationandsystematicreviewofmicestimatesofpromismeasures AT mokkinklidwineb minimalimportantchangemicaconceptualclarificationandsystematicreviewofmicestimatesofpromismeasures |