Cargando…

Diagnostic Evaluation of Visual Snow

Introduction: To determine which patients with visual snow (VS) and VS syndrome (VSS) require standard ophthalmologic testing including automated visual field and which patients require further testing such as macular spectral domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT), electrophysiology, and neur...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Vaphiades, Michael S., Grondines, Brendan, Cooper, Kasey, Gratton, Sean, Doyle, Jennifer
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8481612/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34603194
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2021.743608
_version_ 1784576713328427008
author Vaphiades, Michael S.
Grondines, Brendan
Cooper, Kasey
Gratton, Sean
Doyle, Jennifer
author_facet Vaphiades, Michael S.
Grondines, Brendan
Cooper, Kasey
Gratton, Sean
Doyle, Jennifer
author_sort Vaphiades, Michael S.
collection PubMed
description Introduction: To determine which patients with visual snow (VS) and VS syndrome (VSS) require standard ophthalmologic testing including automated visual field and which patients require further testing such as macular spectral domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT), electrophysiology, and neuroimaging. Materials and Methods: We retrospectively reviewed 52 consecutive patients at three institutions with VS and VSS including the University of Alabama, Callahan Eye Hospital, the University of Missouri-Kansas City School of Medicine, and the Little Rock Eye Clinic from the years 2015 to 2021. We collected historical information, examination findings, ophthalmic testing, electrophysiology, and neuroimaging. Results: Of the 52 patients with VS and VSS, eight of the 52 cases met the clinical criteria for VSS. The ages ranged from 7 to 79 years, with a mean age of 25 years (SD = 14.0). There were 22 males and 30 females. Color vision was tested in 51 cases and was normal in 47 cases (92%). A funduscopic exam was performed in all 52 cases and was normal in 46 cases (88%). The macular SD-OCT was normal in all of the 19 cases that it was performed (100%). A Humphrey visual field was performed in 50 cases and was normal in 43 (86%). A visually evoked potential (VEP) was normal in 18 of the 19 cases where it was obtained (95%). The full-field electroretinography (ffERG) was obtained in 28 cases and was normal in 25 (89%). The multifocal electroretinography (mfERG) was normal in 11 of 12 cases (92%). Only four patients accounted for all of the abnormal electrophysiological tests. In the 37 cases that had an MRI, 29 were normal (78%). Only one patient revealed a lesion in the visual pathway (right optic nerve enhancement in an optic neuritis patient). Conclusions: Patients with VS and VSS, if typical in presentation and with normal testing, do not require a workup beyond a thorough history, neuro-ophthalmologic examination, and automated perimetry. If this testing is abnormal, then ancillary testing is required.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8481612
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-84816122021-10-01 Diagnostic Evaluation of Visual Snow Vaphiades, Michael S. Grondines, Brendan Cooper, Kasey Gratton, Sean Doyle, Jennifer Front Neurol Neurology Introduction: To determine which patients with visual snow (VS) and VS syndrome (VSS) require standard ophthalmologic testing including automated visual field and which patients require further testing such as macular spectral domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT), electrophysiology, and neuroimaging. Materials and Methods: We retrospectively reviewed 52 consecutive patients at three institutions with VS and VSS including the University of Alabama, Callahan Eye Hospital, the University of Missouri-Kansas City School of Medicine, and the Little Rock Eye Clinic from the years 2015 to 2021. We collected historical information, examination findings, ophthalmic testing, electrophysiology, and neuroimaging. Results: Of the 52 patients with VS and VSS, eight of the 52 cases met the clinical criteria for VSS. The ages ranged from 7 to 79 years, with a mean age of 25 years (SD = 14.0). There were 22 males and 30 females. Color vision was tested in 51 cases and was normal in 47 cases (92%). A funduscopic exam was performed in all 52 cases and was normal in 46 cases (88%). The macular SD-OCT was normal in all of the 19 cases that it was performed (100%). A Humphrey visual field was performed in 50 cases and was normal in 43 (86%). A visually evoked potential (VEP) was normal in 18 of the 19 cases where it was obtained (95%). The full-field electroretinography (ffERG) was obtained in 28 cases and was normal in 25 (89%). The multifocal electroretinography (mfERG) was normal in 11 of 12 cases (92%). Only four patients accounted for all of the abnormal electrophysiological tests. In the 37 cases that had an MRI, 29 were normal (78%). Only one patient revealed a lesion in the visual pathway (right optic nerve enhancement in an optic neuritis patient). Conclusions: Patients with VS and VSS, if typical in presentation and with normal testing, do not require a workup beyond a thorough history, neuro-ophthalmologic examination, and automated perimetry. If this testing is abnormal, then ancillary testing is required. Frontiers Media S.A. 2021-09-16 /pmc/articles/PMC8481612/ /pubmed/34603194 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2021.743608 Text en Copyright © 2021 Vaphiades, Grondines, Cooper, Gratton and Doyle. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Neurology
Vaphiades, Michael S.
Grondines, Brendan
Cooper, Kasey
Gratton, Sean
Doyle, Jennifer
Diagnostic Evaluation of Visual Snow
title Diagnostic Evaluation of Visual Snow
title_full Diagnostic Evaluation of Visual Snow
title_fullStr Diagnostic Evaluation of Visual Snow
title_full_unstemmed Diagnostic Evaluation of Visual Snow
title_short Diagnostic Evaluation of Visual Snow
title_sort diagnostic evaluation of visual snow
topic Neurology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8481612/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34603194
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2021.743608
work_keys_str_mv AT vaphiadesmichaels diagnosticevaluationofvisualsnow
AT grondinesbrendan diagnosticevaluationofvisualsnow
AT cooperkasey diagnosticevaluationofvisualsnow
AT grattonsean diagnosticevaluationofvisualsnow
AT doylejennifer diagnosticevaluationofvisualsnow