Cargando…
No evidence for loss of natalizumab effectiveness with every-6-week dosing: a propensity score–matched comparison with every-4-week dosing in patients enrolled in the Tysabri Observational Program (TOP)
BACKGROUND: Extended interval dosing of natalizumab is associated with significantly lower progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy risk compared with every-4-week (Q4W) dosing in patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis. Previous studies have suggested that natalizumab effectiveness i...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
SAGE Publications
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8481711/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34603507 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/17562864211042458 |
_version_ | 1784576738358984704 |
---|---|
author | Butzkueven, Helmut Kappos, Ludwig Spelman, Tim Trojano, Maria Wiendl, Heinz Su, Ray Liao, Shirley Hyde, Robert Licata, Stephanie Ho, Pei-Ran Campbell, Nolan |
author_facet | Butzkueven, Helmut Kappos, Ludwig Spelman, Tim Trojano, Maria Wiendl, Heinz Su, Ray Liao, Shirley Hyde, Robert Licata, Stephanie Ho, Pei-Ran Campbell, Nolan |
author_sort | Butzkueven, Helmut |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Extended interval dosing of natalizumab is associated with significantly lower progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy risk compared with every-4-week (Q4W) dosing in patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis. Previous studies have suggested that natalizumab effectiveness is maintained in patients who switch from Q4W to extended interval dosing but have been limited by a lack of well-matched patient cohorts. METHODS: Tysabri Observational Program (TOP) data as of November 2019 were used to identify patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis treated with natalizumab Q4W and those with a single physician-indicated dosing change from Q4W to every-6-week (Q6W) dosing after ⩾1 year of Q4W treatment. Patients were propensity score matched at the time of the switch from Q4W to Q6W dosing. Clinical outcomes (annualized relapse rate and probability of remaining relapse free or free of 24-week confirmed disability worsening) and safety outcomes were assessed for the two cohorts. RESULTS: This study included 219 pairs of propensity score–matched Q6W and Q4W patients. Annualized relapse rates were similar for Q6W (0.150) and Q4W (0.157) patients. The probability of remaining relapse free [hazard ratio = 1.243 (95% confidence interval = 0.819–1.888); p = 0.307] and of remaining free of 24-week confirmed disability worsening [hazard ratio = 0.786 (95% confidence interval = 0.284–2.176); p = 0.644] did not differ significantly between Q6W and Q4W patients. Summarized safety results for the matched Q6W and Q4W patients are also presented. CONCLUSION: These real-world findings in well-matched patient cohorts from TOP demonstrate that natalizumab effectiveness is maintained in patients who switch to Q6W dosing after ⩾1 year of Q4W dosing. CLINICALTRIALS.GOV IDENTIFIER: NCT00493298 |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8481711 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | SAGE Publications |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-84817112021-10-01 No evidence for loss of natalizumab effectiveness with every-6-week dosing: a propensity score–matched comparison with every-4-week dosing in patients enrolled in the Tysabri Observational Program (TOP) Butzkueven, Helmut Kappos, Ludwig Spelman, Tim Trojano, Maria Wiendl, Heinz Su, Ray Liao, Shirley Hyde, Robert Licata, Stephanie Ho, Pei-Ran Campbell, Nolan Ther Adv Neurol Disord Original Research BACKGROUND: Extended interval dosing of natalizumab is associated with significantly lower progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy risk compared with every-4-week (Q4W) dosing in patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis. Previous studies have suggested that natalizumab effectiveness is maintained in patients who switch from Q4W to extended interval dosing but have been limited by a lack of well-matched patient cohorts. METHODS: Tysabri Observational Program (TOP) data as of November 2019 were used to identify patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis treated with natalizumab Q4W and those with a single physician-indicated dosing change from Q4W to every-6-week (Q6W) dosing after ⩾1 year of Q4W treatment. Patients were propensity score matched at the time of the switch from Q4W to Q6W dosing. Clinical outcomes (annualized relapse rate and probability of remaining relapse free or free of 24-week confirmed disability worsening) and safety outcomes were assessed for the two cohorts. RESULTS: This study included 219 pairs of propensity score–matched Q6W and Q4W patients. Annualized relapse rates were similar for Q6W (0.150) and Q4W (0.157) patients. The probability of remaining relapse free [hazard ratio = 1.243 (95% confidence interval = 0.819–1.888); p = 0.307] and of remaining free of 24-week confirmed disability worsening [hazard ratio = 0.786 (95% confidence interval = 0.284–2.176); p = 0.644] did not differ significantly between Q6W and Q4W patients. Summarized safety results for the matched Q6W and Q4W patients are also presented. CONCLUSION: These real-world findings in well-matched patient cohorts from TOP demonstrate that natalizumab effectiveness is maintained in patients who switch to Q6W dosing after ⩾1 year of Q4W dosing. CLINICALTRIALS.GOV IDENTIFIER: NCT00493298 SAGE Publications 2021-09-27 /pmc/articles/PMC8481711/ /pubmed/34603507 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/17562864211042458 Text en © The Author(s), 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access page(https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage). |
spellingShingle | Original Research Butzkueven, Helmut Kappos, Ludwig Spelman, Tim Trojano, Maria Wiendl, Heinz Su, Ray Liao, Shirley Hyde, Robert Licata, Stephanie Ho, Pei-Ran Campbell, Nolan No evidence for loss of natalizumab effectiveness with every-6-week dosing: a propensity score–matched comparison with every-4-week dosing in patients enrolled in the Tysabri Observational Program (TOP) |
title | No evidence for loss of natalizumab effectiveness with every-6-week dosing: a propensity score–matched comparison with every-4-week dosing in patients enrolled in the Tysabri Observational Program (TOP) |
title_full | No evidence for loss of natalizumab effectiveness with every-6-week dosing: a propensity score–matched comparison with every-4-week dosing in patients enrolled in the Tysabri Observational Program (TOP) |
title_fullStr | No evidence for loss of natalizumab effectiveness with every-6-week dosing: a propensity score–matched comparison with every-4-week dosing in patients enrolled in the Tysabri Observational Program (TOP) |
title_full_unstemmed | No evidence for loss of natalizumab effectiveness with every-6-week dosing: a propensity score–matched comparison with every-4-week dosing in patients enrolled in the Tysabri Observational Program (TOP) |
title_short | No evidence for loss of natalizumab effectiveness with every-6-week dosing: a propensity score–matched comparison with every-4-week dosing in patients enrolled in the Tysabri Observational Program (TOP) |
title_sort | no evidence for loss of natalizumab effectiveness with every-6-week dosing: a propensity score–matched comparison with every-4-week dosing in patients enrolled in the tysabri observational program (top) |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8481711/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34603507 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/17562864211042458 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT butzkuevenhelmut noevidenceforlossofnatalizumabeffectivenesswithevery6weekdosingapropensityscorematchedcomparisonwithevery4weekdosinginpatientsenrolledinthetysabriobservationalprogramtop AT kapposludwig noevidenceforlossofnatalizumabeffectivenesswithevery6weekdosingapropensityscorematchedcomparisonwithevery4weekdosinginpatientsenrolledinthetysabriobservationalprogramtop AT spelmantim noevidenceforlossofnatalizumabeffectivenesswithevery6weekdosingapropensityscorematchedcomparisonwithevery4weekdosinginpatientsenrolledinthetysabriobservationalprogramtop AT trojanomaria noevidenceforlossofnatalizumabeffectivenesswithevery6weekdosingapropensityscorematchedcomparisonwithevery4weekdosinginpatientsenrolledinthetysabriobservationalprogramtop AT wiendlheinz noevidenceforlossofnatalizumabeffectivenesswithevery6weekdosingapropensityscorematchedcomparisonwithevery4weekdosinginpatientsenrolledinthetysabriobservationalprogramtop AT suray noevidenceforlossofnatalizumabeffectivenesswithevery6weekdosingapropensityscorematchedcomparisonwithevery4weekdosinginpatientsenrolledinthetysabriobservationalprogramtop AT liaoshirley noevidenceforlossofnatalizumabeffectivenesswithevery6weekdosingapropensityscorematchedcomparisonwithevery4weekdosinginpatientsenrolledinthetysabriobservationalprogramtop AT hyderobert noevidenceforlossofnatalizumabeffectivenesswithevery6weekdosingapropensityscorematchedcomparisonwithevery4weekdosinginpatientsenrolledinthetysabriobservationalprogramtop AT licatastephanie noevidenceforlossofnatalizumabeffectivenesswithevery6weekdosingapropensityscorematchedcomparisonwithevery4weekdosinginpatientsenrolledinthetysabriobservationalprogramtop AT hopeiran noevidenceforlossofnatalizumabeffectivenesswithevery6weekdosingapropensityscorematchedcomparisonwithevery4weekdosinginpatientsenrolledinthetysabriobservationalprogramtop AT campbellnolan noevidenceforlossofnatalizumabeffectivenesswithevery6weekdosingapropensityscorematchedcomparisonwithevery4weekdosinginpatientsenrolledinthetysabriobservationalprogramtop |