Cargando…

No evidence for loss of natalizumab effectiveness with every-6-week dosing: a propensity score–matched comparison with every-4-week dosing in patients enrolled in the Tysabri Observational Program (TOP)

BACKGROUND: Extended interval dosing of natalizumab is associated with significantly lower progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy risk compared with every-4-week (Q4W) dosing in patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis. Previous studies have suggested that natalizumab effectiveness i...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Butzkueven, Helmut, Kappos, Ludwig, Spelman, Tim, Trojano, Maria, Wiendl, Heinz, Su, Ray, Liao, Shirley, Hyde, Robert, Licata, Stephanie, Ho, Pei-Ran, Campbell, Nolan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8481711/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34603507
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/17562864211042458
_version_ 1784576738358984704
author Butzkueven, Helmut
Kappos, Ludwig
Spelman, Tim
Trojano, Maria
Wiendl, Heinz
Su, Ray
Liao, Shirley
Hyde, Robert
Licata, Stephanie
Ho, Pei-Ran
Campbell, Nolan
author_facet Butzkueven, Helmut
Kappos, Ludwig
Spelman, Tim
Trojano, Maria
Wiendl, Heinz
Su, Ray
Liao, Shirley
Hyde, Robert
Licata, Stephanie
Ho, Pei-Ran
Campbell, Nolan
author_sort Butzkueven, Helmut
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Extended interval dosing of natalizumab is associated with significantly lower progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy risk compared with every-4-week (Q4W) dosing in patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis. Previous studies have suggested that natalizumab effectiveness is maintained in patients who switch from Q4W to extended interval dosing but have been limited by a lack of well-matched patient cohorts. METHODS: Tysabri Observational Program (TOP) data as of November 2019 were used to identify patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis treated with natalizumab Q4W and those with a single physician-indicated dosing change from Q4W to every-6-week (Q6W) dosing after ⩾1 year of Q4W treatment. Patients were propensity score matched at the time of the switch from Q4W to Q6W dosing. Clinical outcomes (annualized relapse rate and probability of remaining relapse free or free of 24-week confirmed disability worsening) and safety outcomes were assessed for the two cohorts. RESULTS: This study included 219 pairs of propensity score–matched Q6W and Q4W patients. Annualized relapse rates were similar for Q6W (0.150) and Q4W (0.157) patients. The probability of remaining relapse free [hazard ratio = 1.243 (95% confidence interval = 0.819–1.888); p = 0.307] and of remaining free of 24-week confirmed disability worsening [hazard ratio = 0.786 (95% confidence interval = 0.284–2.176); p = 0.644] did not differ significantly between Q6W and Q4W patients. Summarized safety results for the matched Q6W and Q4W patients are also presented. CONCLUSION: These real-world findings in well-matched patient cohorts from TOP demonstrate that natalizumab effectiveness is maintained in patients who switch to Q6W dosing after ⩾1 year of Q4W dosing. CLINICALTRIALS.GOV IDENTIFIER: NCT00493298
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8481711
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-84817112021-10-01 No evidence for loss of natalizumab effectiveness with every-6-week dosing: a propensity score–matched comparison with every-4-week dosing in patients enrolled in the Tysabri Observational Program (TOP) Butzkueven, Helmut Kappos, Ludwig Spelman, Tim Trojano, Maria Wiendl, Heinz Su, Ray Liao, Shirley Hyde, Robert Licata, Stephanie Ho, Pei-Ran Campbell, Nolan Ther Adv Neurol Disord Original Research BACKGROUND: Extended interval dosing of natalizumab is associated with significantly lower progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy risk compared with every-4-week (Q4W) dosing in patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis. Previous studies have suggested that natalizumab effectiveness is maintained in patients who switch from Q4W to extended interval dosing but have been limited by a lack of well-matched patient cohorts. METHODS: Tysabri Observational Program (TOP) data as of November 2019 were used to identify patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis treated with natalizumab Q4W and those with a single physician-indicated dosing change from Q4W to every-6-week (Q6W) dosing after ⩾1 year of Q4W treatment. Patients were propensity score matched at the time of the switch from Q4W to Q6W dosing. Clinical outcomes (annualized relapse rate and probability of remaining relapse free or free of 24-week confirmed disability worsening) and safety outcomes were assessed for the two cohorts. RESULTS: This study included 219 pairs of propensity score–matched Q6W and Q4W patients. Annualized relapse rates were similar for Q6W (0.150) and Q4W (0.157) patients. The probability of remaining relapse free [hazard ratio = 1.243 (95% confidence interval = 0.819–1.888); p = 0.307] and of remaining free of 24-week confirmed disability worsening [hazard ratio = 0.786 (95% confidence interval = 0.284–2.176); p = 0.644] did not differ significantly between Q6W and Q4W patients. Summarized safety results for the matched Q6W and Q4W patients are also presented. CONCLUSION: These real-world findings in well-matched patient cohorts from TOP demonstrate that natalizumab effectiveness is maintained in patients who switch to Q6W dosing after ⩾1 year of Q4W dosing. CLINICALTRIALS.GOV IDENTIFIER: NCT00493298 SAGE Publications 2021-09-27 /pmc/articles/PMC8481711/ /pubmed/34603507 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/17562864211042458 Text en © The Author(s), 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access page(https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle Original Research
Butzkueven, Helmut
Kappos, Ludwig
Spelman, Tim
Trojano, Maria
Wiendl, Heinz
Su, Ray
Liao, Shirley
Hyde, Robert
Licata, Stephanie
Ho, Pei-Ran
Campbell, Nolan
No evidence for loss of natalizumab effectiveness with every-6-week dosing: a propensity score–matched comparison with every-4-week dosing in patients enrolled in the Tysabri Observational Program (TOP)
title No evidence for loss of natalizumab effectiveness with every-6-week dosing: a propensity score–matched comparison with every-4-week dosing in patients enrolled in the Tysabri Observational Program (TOP)
title_full No evidence for loss of natalizumab effectiveness with every-6-week dosing: a propensity score–matched comparison with every-4-week dosing in patients enrolled in the Tysabri Observational Program (TOP)
title_fullStr No evidence for loss of natalizumab effectiveness with every-6-week dosing: a propensity score–matched comparison with every-4-week dosing in patients enrolled in the Tysabri Observational Program (TOP)
title_full_unstemmed No evidence for loss of natalizumab effectiveness with every-6-week dosing: a propensity score–matched comparison with every-4-week dosing in patients enrolled in the Tysabri Observational Program (TOP)
title_short No evidence for loss of natalizumab effectiveness with every-6-week dosing: a propensity score–matched comparison with every-4-week dosing in patients enrolled in the Tysabri Observational Program (TOP)
title_sort no evidence for loss of natalizumab effectiveness with every-6-week dosing: a propensity score–matched comparison with every-4-week dosing in patients enrolled in the tysabri observational program (top)
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8481711/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34603507
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/17562864211042458
work_keys_str_mv AT butzkuevenhelmut noevidenceforlossofnatalizumabeffectivenesswithevery6weekdosingapropensityscorematchedcomparisonwithevery4weekdosinginpatientsenrolledinthetysabriobservationalprogramtop
AT kapposludwig noevidenceforlossofnatalizumabeffectivenesswithevery6weekdosingapropensityscorematchedcomparisonwithevery4weekdosinginpatientsenrolledinthetysabriobservationalprogramtop
AT spelmantim noevidenceforlossofnatalizumabeffectivenesswithevery6weekdosingapropensityscorematchedcomparisonwithevery4weekdosinginpatientsenrolledinthetysabriobservationalprogramtop
AT trojanomaria noevidenceforlossofnatalizumabeffectivenesswithevery6weekdosingapropensityscorematchedcomparisonwithevery4weekdosinginpatientsenrolledinthetysabriobservationalprogramtop
AT wiendlheinz noevidenceforlossofnatalizumabeffectivenesswithevery6weekdosingapropensityscorematchedcomparisonwithevery4weekdosinginpatientsenrolledinthetysabriobservationalprogramtop
AT suray noevidenceforlossofnatalizumabeffectivenesswithevery6weekdosingapropensityscorematchedcomparisonwithevery4weekdosinginpatientsenrolledinthetysabriobservationalprogramtop
AT liaoshirley noevidenceforlossofnatalizumabeffectivenesswithevery6weekdosingapropensityscorematchedcomparisonwithevery4weekdosinginpatientsenrolledinthetysabriobservationalprogramtop
AT hyderobert noevidenceforlossofnatalizumabeffectivenesswithevery6weekdosingapropensityscorematchedcomparisonwithevery4weekdosinginpatientsenrolledinthetysabriobservationalprogramtop
AT licatastephanie noevidenceforlossofnatalizumabeffectivenesswithevery6weekdosingapropensityscorematchedcomparisonwithevery4weekdosinginpatientsenrolledinthetysabriobservationalprogramtop
AT hopeiran noevidenceforlossofnatalizumabeffectivenesswithevery6weekdosingapropensityscorematchedcomparisonwithevery4weekdosinginpatientsenrolledinthetysabriobservationalprogramtop
AT campbellnolan noevidenceforlossofnatalizumabeffectivenesswithevery6weekdosingapropensityscorematchedcomparisonwithevery4weekdosinginpatientsenrolledinthetysabriobservationalprogramtop