Cargando…

Powered air-purifying respirators used during the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic significantly reduce speech perception

BACKGROUND: Due to the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, interventions in the upper airways are considered high-risk procedures for otolaryngologists and their colleagues. The purpose of this study was to evaluate limitations in hearing and communication when using a powered air-purifyin...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Weiss, Roxanne, Guchlerner, Leon, Weissgerber, Tobias, Filmann, Natalie, Haake, Birgit, Zacharowski, Kai, Wolf, Timo, Wicker, Sabine, Kempf, Volkhard A. J., Ciesek, Sandra, Stöver, Timo, Diensthuber, Marc
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8481762/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34592994
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12995-021-00334-y
_version_ 1784576751150563328
author Weiss, Roxanne
Guchlerner, Leon
Weissgerber, Tobias
Filmann, Natalie
Haake, Birgit
Zacharowski, Kai
Wolf, Timo
Wicker, Sabine
Kempf, Volkhard A. J.
Ciesek, Sandra
Stöver, Timo
Diensthuber, Marc
author_facet Weiss, Roxanne
Guchlerner, Leon
Weissgerber, Tobias
Filmann, Natalie
Haake, Birgit
Zacharowski, Kai
Wolf, Timo
Wicker, Sabine
Kempf, Volkhard A. J.
Ciesek, Sandra
Stöver, Timo
Diensthuber, Marc
author_sort Weiss, Roxanne
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Due to the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, interventions in the upper airways are considered high-risk procedures for otolaryngologists and their colleagues. The purpose of this study was to evaluate limitations in hearing and communication when using a powered air-purifying respirator (PAPR) system to protect against severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus type 2 (SARS-CoV-2) transmission and to assess the benefit of a headset. METHODS: Acoustic properties of the PAPR system were measured using a head and torso simulator. Audiological tests (tone audiometry, Freiburg speech test, Oldenburg sentence test (OLSA)) were performed in normal-hearing subjects (n = 10) to assess hearing with PAPR. The audiological test setup also included simulation of conditions in which the target speaker used either a PAPR, a filtering face piece (FFP) 3 respirator, or a surgical face mask. RESULTS: Audiological measurements revealed that sound insulation by the PAPR headtop and noise, generated by the blower-assisted respiratory protection system, resulted in significantly deteriorated hearing thresholds (4.0 ± 7.2 dB hearing level (HL) vs. 49.2 ± 11.0 dB HL, p < 0.001) and speech recognition scores in quiet (100.0 ± 0.0% vs. 2.5 ± 4.2%, p < 0.001; OLSA: 20.8 ± 1.8 dB vs. 61.0 ± 3.3 dB SPL, p < 0.001) when compared to hearing without PAPR. Hearing with PAPR was significantly improved when the subjects were equipped with an in-ear headset (p < 0.001). Sound attenuation by FFP3 respirators and surgical face masks had no clinically relevant impact on speech perception. CONCLUSIONS: The PAPR system evaluated here can be considered for high-risk procedures in SARS-CoV-2-positive patients, provided that hearing and communication of the surgical team are optimized by the additional use of a headset. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12995-021-00334-y.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8481762
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-84817622021-09-30 Powered air-purifying respirators used during the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic significantly reduce speech perception Weiss, Roxanne Guchlerner, Leon Weissgerber, Tobias Filmann, Natalie Haake, Birgit Zacharowski, Kai Wolf, Timo Wicker, Sabine Kempf, Volkhard A. J. Ciesek, Sandra Stöver, Timo Diensthuber, Marc J Occup Med Toxicol Research BACKGROUND: Due to the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, interventions in the upper airways are considered high-risk procedures for otolaryngologists and their colleagues. The purpose of this study was to evaluate limitations in hearing and communication when using a powered air-purifying respirator (PAPR) system to protect against severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus type 2 (SARS-CoV-2) transmission and to assess the benefit of a headset. METHODS: Acoustic properties of the PAPR system were measured using a head and torso simulator. Audiological tests (tone audiometry, Freiburg speech test, Oldenburg sentence test (OLSA)) were performed in normal-hearing subjects (n = 10) to assess hearing with PAPR. The audiological test setup also included simulation of conditions in which the target speaker used either a PAPR, a filtering face piece (FFP) 3 respirator, or a surgical face mask. RESULTS: Audiological measurements revealed that sound insulation by the PAPR headtop and noise, generated by the blower-assisted respiratory protection system, resulted in significantly deteriorated hearing thresholds (4.0 ± 7.2 dB hearing level (HL) vs. 49.2 ± 11.0 dB HL, p < 0.001) and speech recognition scores in quiet (100.0 ± 0.0% vs. 2.5 ± 4.2%, p < 0.001; OLSA: 20.8 ± 1.8 dB vs. 61.0 ± 3.3 dB SPL, p < 0.001) when compared to hearing without PAPR. Hearing with PAPR was significantly improved when the subjects were equipped with an in-ear headset (p < 0.001). Sound attenuation by FFP3 respirators and surgical face masks had no clinically relevant impact on speech perception. CONCLUSIONS: The PAPR system evaluated here can be considered for high-risk procedures in SARS-CoV-2-positive patients, provided that hearing and communication of the surgical team are optimized by the additional use of a headset. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12995-021-00334-y. BioMed Central 2021-09-30 /pmc/articles/PMC8481762/ /pubmed/34592994 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12995-021-00334-y Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Weiss, Roxanne
Guchlerner, Leon
Weissgerber, Tobias
Filmann, Natalie
Haake, Birgit
Zacharowski, Kai
Wolf, Timo
Wicker, Sabine
Kempf, Volkhard A. J.
Ciesek, Sandra
Stöver, Timo
Diensthuber, Marc
Powered air-purifying respirators used during the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic significantly reduce speech perception
title Powered air-purifying respirators used during the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic significantly reduce speech perception
title_full Powered air-purifying respirators used during the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic significantly reduce speech perception
title_fullStr Powered air-purifying respirators used during the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic significantly reduce speech perception
title_full_unstemmed Powered air-purifying respirators used during the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic significantly reduce speech perception
title_short Powered air-purifying respirators used during the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic significantly reduce speech perception
title_sort powered air-purifying respirators used during the sars-cov-2 pandemic significantly reduce speech perception
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8481762/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34592994
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12995-021-00334-y
work_keys_str_mv AT weissroxanne poweredairpurifyingrespiratorsusedduringthesarscov2pandemicsignificantlyreducespeechperception
AT guchlernerleon poweredairpurifyingrespiratorsusedduringthesarscov2pandemicsignificantlyreducespeechperception
AT weissgerbertobias poweredairpurifyingrespiratorsusedduringthesarscov2pandemicsignificantlyreducespeechperception
AT filmannnatalie poweredairpurifyingrespiratorsusedduringthesarscov2pandemicsignificantlyreducespeechperception
AT haakebirgit poweredairpurifyingrespiratorsusedduringthesarscov2pandemicsignificantlyreducespeechperception
AT zacharowskikai poweredairpurifyingrespiratorsusedduringthesarscov2pandemicsignificantlyreducespeechperception
AT wolftimo poweredairpurifyingrespiratorsusedduringthesarscov2pandemicsignificantlyreducespeechperception
AT wickersabine poweredairpurifyingrespiratorsusedduringthesarscov2pandemicsignificantlyreducespeechperception
AT kempfvolkhardaj poweredairpurifyingrespiratorsusedduringthesarscov2pandemicsignificantlyreducespeechperception
AT cieseksandra poweredairpurifyingrespiratorsusedduringthesarscov2pandemicsignificantlyreducespeechperception
AT stovertimo poweredairpurifyingrespiratorsusedduringthesarscov2pandemicsignificantlyreducespeechperception
AT diensthubermarc poweredairpurifyingrespiratorsusedduringthesarscov2pandemicsignificantlyreducespeechperception