Cargando…

Evaluation of the SARS-CoV-2 Inactivation Efficacy Associated With Buffers From Three Kits Used on High-Throughput RNA Extraction Platforms

Rapid and demonstrable inactivation of SARS-CoV-2 is crucial to ensure operator safety during high-throughput testing of clinical samples. The inactivation efficacy of SARS-CoV-2 was evaluated using commercially available lysis buffers from three viral RNA extraction kits used on two high-throughput...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Thom, Ruth E., Eastaugh, Lin S., O’Brien, Lyn M., Ulaeto, David O., Findlay, James S., Smither, Sophie J., Phelps, Amanda L., Stapleton, Helen L., Hamblin, Karleigh A., Weller, Simon A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8481894/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34604108
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fcimb.2021.716436
_version_ 1784576784188047360
author Thom, Ruth E.
Eastaugh, Lin S.
O’Brien, Lyn M.
Ulaeto, David O.
Findlay, James S.
Smither, Sophie J.
Phelps, Amanda L.
Stapleton, Helen L.
Hamblin, Karleigh A.
Weller, Simon A.
author_facet Thom, Ruth E.
Eastaugh, Lin S.
O’Brien, Lyn M.
Ulaeto, David O.
Findlay, James S.
Smither, Sophie J.
Phelps, Amanda L.
Stapleton, Helen L.
Hamblin, Karleigh A.
Weller, Simon A.
author_sort Thom, Ruth E.
collection PubMed
description Rapid and demonstrable inactivation of SARS-CoV-2 is crucial to ensure operator safety during high-throughput testing of clinical samples. The inactivation efficacy of SARS-CoV-2 was evaluated using commercially available lysis buffers from three viral RNA extraction kits used on two high-throughput (96-well) RNA extraction platforms (Qiagen QIAcube HT and the Thermo Fisher KingFisher Flex) in combination with thermal treatment. Buffer volumes and sample ratios were chosen for their optimised suitability for RNA extraction rather than inactivation efficacy and tested against a representative sample type: SARS-CoV-2 spiked into viral transport medium (VTM). A lysis buffer mix from the MagMAX Pathogen RNA/DNA kit (Thermo Fisher), used on the KingFisher Flex, which included guanidinium isothiocyanate (GITC), a detergent, and isopropanol, demonstrated a minimum inactivation efficacy of 1 × 10(5) tissue culture infectious dose (TCID)(50)/ml. Alternative lysis buffer mixes from the MagMAX Viral/Pathogen Nucleic Acid kit (Thermo Fisher) also used on the KingFisher Flex and from the QIAamp 96 Virus QIAcube HT Kit (Qiagen) used on the QIAcube HT (both of which contained GITC and a detergent) reduced titres by 1 × 10(4) TCID(50)/ml but did not completely inactivate the virus. Heat treatment alone (15 min, 68°C) did not completely inactivate the virus, demonstrating a reduction of 1 × 10(3) TCID(50)/ml. When inactivation methods included both heat treatment and addition of lysis buffer, all methods were shown to completely inactivate SARS-CoV-2 inactivation against the viral titres tested. Results are discussed in the context of the operation of a high-throughput diagnostic laboratory.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8481894
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-84818942021-10-01 Evaluation of the SARS-CoV-2 Inactivation Efficacy Associated With Buffers From Three Kits Used on High-Throughput RNA Extraction Platforms Thom, Ruth E. Eastaugh, Lin S. O’Brien, Lyn M. Ulaeto, David O. Findlay, James S. Smither, Sophie J. Phelps, Amanda L. Stapleton, Helen L. Hamblin, Karleigh A. Weller, Simon A. Front Cell Infect Microbiol Cellular and Infection Microbiology Rapid and demonstrable inactivation of SARS-CoV-2 is crucial to ensure operator safety during high-throughput testing of clinical samples. The inactivation efficacy of SARS-CoV-2 was evaluated using commercially available lysis buffers from three viral RNA extraction kits used on two high-throughput (96-well) RNA extraction platforms (Qiagen QIAcube HT and the Thermo Fisher KingFisher Flex) in combination with thermal treatment. Buffer volumes and sample ratios were chosen for their optimised suitability for RNA extraction rather than inactivation efficacy and tested against a representative sample type: SARS-CoV-2 spiked into viral transport medium (VTM). A lysis buffer mix from the MagMAX Pathogen RNA/DNA kit (Thermo Fisher), used on the KingFisher Flex, which included guanidinium isothiocyanate (GITC), a detergent, and isopropanol, demonstrated a minimum inactivation efficacy of 1 × 10(5) tissue culture infectious dose (TCID)(50)/ml. Alternative lysis buffer mixes from the MagMAX Viral/Pathogen Nucleic Acid kit (Thermo Fisher) also used on the KingFisher Flex and from the QIAamp 96 Virus QIAcube HT Kit (Qiagen) used on the QIAcube HT (both of which contained GITC and a detergent) reduced titres by 1 × 10(4) TCID(50)/ml but did not completely inactivate the virus. Heat treatment alone (15 min, 68°C) did not completely inactivate the virus, demonstrating a reduction of 1 × 10(3) TCID(50)/ml. When inactivation methods included both heat treatment and addition of lysis buffer, all methods were shown to completely inactivate SARS-CoV-2 inactivation against the viral titres tested. Results are discussed in the context of the operation of a high-throughput diagnostic laboratory. Frontiers Media S.A. 2021-09-16 /pmc/articles/PMC8481894/ /pubmed/34604108 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fcimb.2021.716436 Text en Crown copyright © 2021 Dstl. Authors: Thom, Eastaugh, O’Brien, Ulaeto, Findlay, Smither, Phelps, Stapleton, Hamblin and Weller https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Cellular and Infection Microbiology
Thom, Ruth E.
Eastaugh, Lin S.
O’Brien, Lyn M.
Ulaeto, David O.
Findlay, James S.
Smither, Sophie J.
Phelps, Amanda L.
Stapleton, Helen L.
Hamblin, Karleigh A.
Weller, Simon A.
Evaluation of the SARS-CoV-2 Inactivation Efficacy Associated With Buffers From Three Kits Used on High-Throughput RNA Extraction Platforms
title Evaluation of the SARS-CoV-2 Inactivation Efficacy Associated With Buffers From Three Kits Used on High-Throughput RNA Extraction Platforms
title_full Evaluation of the SARS-CoV-2 Inactivation Efficacy Associated With Buffers From Three Kits Used on High-Throughput RNA Extraction Platforms
title_fullStr Evaluation of the SARS-CoV-2 Inactivation Efficacy Associated With Buffers From Three Kits Used on High-Throughput RNA Extraction Platforms
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of the SARS-CoV-2 Inactivation Efficacy Associated With Buffers From Three Kits Used on High-Throughput RNA Extraction Platforms
title_short Evaluation of the SARS-CoV-2 Inactivation Efficacy Associated With Buffers From Three Kits Used on High-Throughput RNA Extraction Platforms
title_sort evaluation of the sars-cov-2 inactivation efficacy associated with buffers from three kits used on high-throughput rna extraction platforms
topic Cellular and Infection Microbiology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8481894/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34604108
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fcimb.2021.716436
work_keys_str_mv AT thomruthe evaluationofthesarscov2inactivationefficacyassociatedwithbuffersfromthreekitsusedonhighthroughputrnaextractionplatforms
AT eastaughlins evaluationofthesarscov2inactivationefficacyassociatedwithbuffersfromthreekitsusedonhighthroughputrnaextractionplatforms
AT obrienlynm evaluationofthesarscov2inactivationefficacyassociatedwithbuffersfromthreekitsusedonhighthroughputrnaextractionplatforms
AT ulaetodavido evaluationofthesarscov2inactivationefficacyassociatedwithbuffersfromthreekitsusedonhighthroughputrnaextractionplatforms
AT findlayjamess evaluationofthesarscov2inactivationefficacyassociatedwithbuffersfromthreekitsusedonhighthroughputrnaextractionplatforms
AT smithersophiej evaluationofthesarscov2inactivationefficacyassociatedwithbuffersfromthreekitsusedonhighthroughputrnaextractionplatforms
AT phelpsamandal evaluationofthesarscov2inactivationefficacyassociatedwithbuffersfromthreekitsusedonhighthroughputrnaextractionplatforms
AT stapletonhelenl evaluationofthesarscov2inactivationefficacyassociatedwithbuffersfromthreekitsusedonhighthroughputrnaextractionplatforms
AT hamblinkarleigha evaluationofthesarscov2inactivationefficacyassociatedwithbuffersfromthreekitsusedonhighthroughputrnaextractionplatforms
AT wellersimona evaluationofthesarscov2inactivationefficacyassociatedwithbuffersfromthreekitsusedonhighthroughputrnaextractionplatforms