Cargando…

Immunization Against Poliomyelitis and the Challenges to Worldwide Poliomyelitis Eradication

Both inactivated poliovirus vaccine (IPV) and oral poliovirus vaccine (OPV) have contributed to the rapid disappearance of paralytic poliomyelitis from developed countries despite possessing different vaccine properties. Due to cost, ease of use, and other properties, the Expanded Programme on Immun...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Modlin, John F, Bandyopadhyay, Ananda S, Sutter, Roland
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8482017/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34590135
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/infdis/jiaa622
_version_ 1784576805761449984
author Modlin, John F
Bandyopadhyay, Ananda S
Sutter, Roland
author_facet Modlin, John F
Bandyopadhyay, Ananda S
Sutter, Roland
author_sort Modlin, John F
collection PubMed
description Both inactivated poliovirus vaccine (IPV) and oral poliovirus vaccine (OPV) have contributed to the rapid disappearance of paralytic poliomyelitis from developed countries despite possessing different vaccine properties. Due to cost, ease of use, and other properties, the Expanded Programme on Immunization added OPV to the routine infant immunization schedule for low-income countries in 1974, but variable vaccine uptake and impaired immune responses due to poor sanitation limited the impact. Following launch of the Global Polio Eradication Initiative in 1988, poliomyelitis incidence has been reduced by >99% and types 2 and 3 wild polioviruses are now eradicated, but progress against type 1 polioviruses which are now confined to Afghanistan and Pakistan has slowed due to insecurity, poor access, and other problems. A strategic, globally coordinated replacement of trivalent OPV with bivalent 1, 3 OPV in 2016 reduced the incidence of vaccine-associated paralytic poliomyelitis (VAPP) but allowed the escape of type 2 vaccine–derived polioviruses (VDPV2) in areas with low immunization rates and use of monovalent OPV2 in response seeded new VDPV2 outbreaks and reestablishment of type 2 endemicity. A novel, more genetically stable type 2 OPV vaccine is undergoing clinical evaluation and may soon be deployed prevent or reduce VDPV2 emergences.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8482017
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-84820172021-09-30 Immunization Against Poliomyelitis and the Challenges to Worldwide Poliomyelitis Eradication Modlin, John F Bandyopadhyay, Ananda S Sutter, Roland J Infect Dis Supplement Articles Both inactivated poliovirus vaccine (IPV) and oral poliovirus vaccine (OPV) have contributed to the rapid disappearance of paralytic poliomyelitis from developed countries despite possessing different vaccine properties. Due to cost, ease of use, and other properties, the Expanded Programme on Immunization added OPV to the routine infant immunization schedule for low-income countries in 1974, but variable vaccine uptake and impaired immune responses due to poor sanitation limited the impact. Following launch of the Global Polio Eradication Initiative in 1988, poliomyelitis incidence has been reduced by >99% and types 2 and 3 wild polioviruses are now eradicated, but progress against type 1 polioviruses which are now confined to Afghanistan and Pakistan has slowed due to insecurity, poor access, and other problems. A strategic, globally coordinated replacement of trivalent OPV with bivalent 1, 3 OPV in 2016 reduced the incidence of vaccine-associated paralytic poliomyelitis (VAPP) but allowed the escape of type 2 vaccine–derived polioviruses (VDPV2) in areas with low immunization rates and use of monovalent OPV2 in response seeded new VDPV2 outbreaks and reestablishment of type 2 endemicity. A novel, more genetically stable type 2 OPV vaccine is undergoing clinical evaluation and may soon be deployed prevent or reduce VDPV2 emergences. Oxford University Press 2021-09-30 /pmc/articles/PMC8482017/ /pubmed/34590135 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/infdis/jiaa622 Text en © The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press for the Infectious Diseases Society of America. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Supplement Articles
Modlin, John F
Bandyopadhyay, Ananda S
Sutter, Roland
Immunization Against Poliomyelitis and the Challenges to Worldwide Poliomyelitis Eradication
title Immunization Against Poliomyelitis and the Challenges to Worldwide Poliomyelitis Eradication
title_full Immunization Against Poliomyelitis and the Challenges to Worldwide Poliomyelitis Eradication
title_fullStr Immunization Against Poliomyelitis and the Challenges to Worldwide Poliomyelitis Eradication
title_full_unstemmed Immunization Against Poliomyelitis and the Challenges to Worldwide Poliomyelitis Eradication
title_short Immunization Against Poliomyelitis and the Challenges to Worldwide Poliomyelitis Eradication
title_sort immunization against poliomyelitis and the challenges to worldwide poliomyelitis eradication
topic Supplement Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8482017/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34590135
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/infdis/jiaa622
work_keys_str_mv AT modlinjohnf immunizationagainstpoliomyelitisandthechallengestoworldwidepoliomyelitiseradication
AT bandyopadhyayanandas immunizationagainstpoliomyelitisandthechallengestoworldwidepoliomyelitiseradication
AT sutterroland immunizationagainstpoliomyelitisandthechallengestoworldwidepoliomyelitiseradication