Cargando…

The Effect of Bright Light Treatment on Rest–Activity Rhythms in People with Dementia: A 24-Week Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial

Bright light treatment is an effective way to influence circadian rhythms in healthy adults, but previous research with dementia patients has yielded mixed results. The present study presents a primary outcome of the DEM.LIGHT trial, a 24-week randomized controlled trial conducted at nursing homes i...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kolberg, Eirin, Pallesen, Ståle, Hjetland, Gunnhild Johnsen, Nordhus, Inger Hilde, Flo-Groeneboom, Elisabeth
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8482074/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34563054
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/clockssleep3030032
_version_ 1784576818790006784
author Kolberg, Eirin
Pallesen, Ståle
Hjetland, Gunnhild Johnsen
Nordhus, Inger Hilde
Flo-Groeneboom, Elisabeth
author_facet Kolberg, Eirin
Pallesen, Ståle
Hjetland, Gunnhild Johnsen
Nordhus, Inger Hilde
Flo-Groeneboom, Elisabeth
author_sort Kolberg, Eirin
collection PubMed
description Bright light treatment is an effective way to influence circadian rhythms in healthy adults, but previous research with dementia patients has yielded mixed results. The present study presents a primary outcome of the DEM.LIGHT trial, a 24-week randomized controlled trial conducted at nursing homes in Bergen, Norway, investigating the effects of a bright light intervention. The intervention consisted of ceiling-mounted LED panels providing varying illuminance and correlated color temperature throughout the day, with a peak of 1000 lx, 6000 K between 10 a.m. and 3 p.m. Activity was recorded using actigraphs at baseline and after 8, 16, and 24 weeks. Non-parametric indicators and extended cosine models were used to investigate rest–activity rhythms, and outcomes were analyzed with multi-level regression models. Sixty-one patients with severe dementia (median MMSE = 4) were included. After 16 weeks, the acrophase was advanced from baseline in the intervention group compared to the control group (B = −1.02, 95%; CI = −2.00, −0.05). There was no significant difference between the groups on any other rest–activity measures. When comparing parametric and non-parametric indicators of rest–activity rhythms, 25 out of 35 comparisons were significantly correlated. The present results indicate that ambient bright light treatment did not improve rest–activity rhythms for people with dementia.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8482074
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-84820742021-10-01 The Effect of Bright Light Treatment on Rest–Activity Rhythms in People with Dementia: A 24-Week Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial Kolberg, Eirin Pallesen, Ståle Hjetland, Gunnhild Johnsen Nordhus, Inger Hilde Flo-Groeneboom, Elisabeth Clocks Sleep Article Bright light treatment is an effective way to influence circadian rhythms in healthy adults, but previous research with dementia patients has yielded mixed results. The present study presents a primary outcome of the DEM.LIGHT trial, a 24-week randomized controlled trial conducted at nursing homes in Bergen, Norway, investigating the effects of a bright light intervention. The intervention consisted of ceiling-mounted LED panels providing varying illuminance and correlated color temperature throughout the day, with a peak of 1000 lx, 6000 K between 10 a.m. and 3 p.m. Activity was recorded using actigraphs at baseline and after 8, 16, and 24 weeks. Non-parametric indicators and extended cosine models were used to investigate rest–activity rhythms, and outcomes were analyzed with multi-level regression models. Sixty-one patients with severe dementia (median MMSE = 4) were included. After 16 weeks, the acrophase was advanced from baseline in the intervention group compared to the control group (B = −1.02, 95%; CI = −2.00, −0.05). There was no significant difference between the groups on any other rest–activity measures. When comparing parametric and non-parametric indicators of rest–activity rhythms, 25 out of 35 comparisons were significantly correlated. The present results indicate that ambient bright light treatment did not improve rest–activity rhythms for people with dementia. MDPI 2021-09-13 /pmc/articles/PMC8482074/ /pubmed/34563054 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/clockssleep3030032 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Kolberg, Eirin
Pallesen, Ståle
Hjetland, Gunnhild Johnsen
Nordhus, Inger Hilde
Flo-Groeneboom, Elisabeth
The Effect of Bright Light Treatment on Rest–Activity Rhythms in People with Dementia: A 24-Week Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial
title The Effect of Bright Light Treatment on Rest–Activity Rhythms in People with Dementia: A 24-Week Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial
title_full The Effect of Bright Light Treatment on Rest–Activity Rhythms in People with Dementia: A 24-Week Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial
title_fullStr The Effect of Bright Light Treatment on Rest–Activity Rhythms in People with Dementia: A 24-Week Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial
title_full_unstemmed The Effect of Bright Light Treatment on Rest–Activity Rhythms in People with Dementia: A 24-Week Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial
title_short The Effect of Bright Light Treatment on Rest–Activity Rhythms in People with Dementia: A 24-Week Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial
title_sort effect of bright light treatment on rest–activity rhythms in people with dementia: a 24-week cluster randomized controlled trial
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8482074/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34563054
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/clockssleep3030032
work_keys_str_mv AT kolbergeirin theeffectofbrightlighttreatmentonrestactivityrhythmsinpeoplewithdementiaa24weekclusterrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT pallesenstale theeffectofbrightlighttreatmentonrestactivityrhythmsinpeoplewithdementiaa24weekclusterrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT hjetlandgunnhildjohnsen theeffectofbrightlighttreatmentonrestactivityrhythmsinpeoplewithdementiaa24weekclusterrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT nordhusingerhilde theeffectofbrightlighttreatmentonrestactivityrhythmsinpeoplewithdementiaa24weekclusterrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT flogroeneboomelisabeth theeffectofbrightlighttreatmentonrestactivityrhythmsinpeoplewithdementiaa24weekclusterrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT kolbergeirin effectofbrightlighttreatmentonrestactivityrhythmsinpeoplewithdementiaa24weekclusterrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT pallesenstale effectofbrightlighttreatmentonrestactivityrhythmsinpeoplewithdementiaa24weekclusterrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT hjetlandgunnhildjohnsen effectofbrightlighttreatmentonrestactivityrhythmsinpeoplewithdementiaa24weekclusterrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT nordhusingerhilde effectofbrightlighttreatmentonrestactivityrhythmsinpeoplewithdementiaa24weekclusterrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT flogroeneboomelisabeth effectofbrightlighttreatmentonrestactivityrhythmsinpeoplewithdementiaa24weekclusterrandomizedcontrolledtrial